★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>C</head> | ||
<note>Ins:<lb/> | |||
Offences Private<lb/> | |||
x Public</note><lb/> | |||
<head>Miscell.</head> | |||
<p>False distinction between Public & Private Offences<lb/> | |||
Murrow Manif.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 1825 in I Barn Cheat 315.<lb/> | |||
There is no <del><gap/></del> Private offence that is known is not<lb/> | |||
Public in it's consequences. But there is a large<lb/> | |||
class of offences which are Public without being<lb/> | |||
Private: which will <add>in time</add> or may come to affect some<lb/> | |||
individuals but which can never be known to affect<lb/> | |||
any ap<gap/>quable individuals in particular.</p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<p>From the moment [a Trade is declared a Bankrupt]<lb/> | |||
on which Bankruptcy is declared to have become commenced<lb/> | |||
the goods of the Bankrupt become <add>the property of</add> his Creditors - not<lb/> | |||
to give an account of them is therefore Embezzlement<lb/> | |||
<del>If there be</del> is punis</p> | |||
<p>If then he is punished as much for <del>stealing</del><lb/> | |||
embezzling a smaller part as for embezzling a<lb/> | |||
larger part, if he <del>she</del> embezzled | |||
as much as much as</p> | |||
<p>Wherever a man, steals <add>& o</add> only to make up a<lb/> | |||
particular sum proportionable punishment will be<lb/> | |||
of use - This is not the case merely with men if<lb/> | |||
reflection. It may be with <hi rend="underline">chardis</hi>, when they want<lb/> | |||
any particular thing.</p> | |||
<p>Stealing from the <hi rend="underline">poor</hi> to be punished more<lb/> | |||
than stealing from the <hi rend="underline">rich</hi>.</p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<note>Objection to Consol.<hi rend="superscript">g</hi>.<lb/> | |||
Acts.</note><lb/> | |||
<p>The great objection to consolidating Acts, or rather<lb/> | |||
to consolidating new provisions into the old<lb/> | |||
Acts is that then the whole becomes new, so that<lb/> | |||
the party that opposes the new provisions sp<gap/> out<lb/> | |||
the time by declaring the old provisions <hi rend="underline">de novo</hi><lb/> | |||
Par Land from Robinson & L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> North.</p> | |||
The remedy would be to make a standing <del>order</del> resolution<lb/> | |||
that it is the opinion of the House that only <del><gap/></del> new provisions<lb/> | |||
ought to be the subject of debate. But this difficulty<lb/> | |||
would be effectually obviated by any method of <add>considering</add><lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
C
Ins:
Offences Private
x Public
Miscell.
False distinction between Public & Private Offences
Murrow Manif.d 1825 in I Barn Cheat 315.
There is no Private offence that is known is not
Public in it's consequences. But there is a large
class of offences which are Public without being
Private: which will in time or may come to affect some
individuals but which can never be known to affect
any apquable individuals in particular.
—
From the moment [a Trade is declared a Bankrupt]
on which Bankruptcy is declared to have become commenced
the goods of the Bankrupt become the property of his Creditors - not
to give an account of them is therefore Embezzlement
If there be is punis
If then he is punished as much for stealing
embezzling a smaller part as for embezzling a
larger part, if he she embezzled
as much as much as
Wherever a man, steals & o only to make up a
particular sum proportionable punishment will be
of use - This is not the case merely with men if
reflection. It may be with chardis, when they want
any particular thing.
Stealing from the poor to be punished more
than stealing from the rich.
—
Objection to Consol.g.
Acts.
The great objection to consolidating Acts, or rather
to consolidating new provisions into the old
Acts is that then the whole becomes new, so that
the party that opposes the new provisions sp out
the time by declaring the old provisions de novo
Par Land from Robinson & Ld North.
The remedy would be to make a standing order resolution
that it is the opinion of the House that only new provisions
ought to be the subject of debate. But this difficulty
would be effectually obviated by any method of considering
|
Identifier: | JB/063/004/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
17-28 |
|||
|
063 |
penal code |
||
|
004 |
miscell. |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f13 / f14 / f15 / f16 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
20193 |
|||
