JB/137/358/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/358/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/137/358/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --><p>&sect;.10 <lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>2 <note>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>As the good conduct <add>During this long period of probation, to</add>  <del>exemplar</del> the exemplary and unexampled<lb/>good conduct of the associated volunteers, the noble<lb/>Lord <del>his</del> <add>with <del>a</del> that <unclear>evidence</unclear> <del>that</del> which is so honourable to himself</add> bears that testimony which has been already brought to<lb/>view.  But at the next step they entered upon the forbidden<lb/>ground of parliamentary reform.</p> <p>How light in his <gap/> experience is when<lb/>set against imagination no one <add>a man</add> could scarcely have conceived<lb/>had not his Lordship himself informed us.</p> <p> Speaking of the <del>Roman</del> Catholics who he says about the time of<lb/>the peace "were already half the number of those who <add>latterly</add> appeared<lb/>in arms", in a year or less he adds they might be <unclear>sent</unclear><lb/>one, for the Protestants were gradually quitting the service,<lb/>and the only apology <del>for those who c</del> <add>might be &#x2014; i.e. in his Lordship's opinion were, for it is of a period <!-- continues into margin --> which at the time<lb/>of his writing was <hi rend="underline">past</hi><lb/>that his Lordship speaks</add> (he continues) <add>goes on to say</add> for<lb/>those who continued after the peace was that they meant<lb/>to prevent the volunteer arms from falling into more dangerous<lb/> hands, and to counterbalance the Roman Catholics.  The<lb/>latter appeared sure of their plan and seemed already<lb/>to exult.</p> <p><del>The</del> For aught appears the volunteers <del>were</del> had still the<lb/>military possession of the whole country: and <add>in 1784</add> within a year <note>in this possessing<lb/>army</note><lb/>after the peace they were already <gap/> to <gap/>.  They being<lb/>then in possession of the country, what then was to be expected<lb/>of them further?  That they should do as they had all along<lb/>done?  If no: but then they should do as they had<lb/>never done: that they should do as had been done by<lb/>others.  At what time?  140 years before, at a time of<lb/><add>general</add> barbarism.</p>                   
<head>1820 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --><p>&sect;.10 <lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>2 <note>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>As the good conduct <add>During this long period of probation, to</add>  <del>exemplar</del> the exemplary and unexampled<lb/>good conduct of the associated volunteers, the noble<lb/>Lord <del>his</del> <add>with <del>a</del> that <unclear>evidence</unclear> <del>that</del> which is so honourable to himself</add> bears that testimony which has been already brought to<lb/>view.  But at the next step they entered upon the forbidden<lb/>ground of parliamentary reform.</p> <p>How light in his <gap/> experience is when<lb/>set against imagination no one <add>a man</add> could scarcely have conceived<lb/>had not his Lordship himself informed us.</p> <p> Speaking of the <del>Roman</del> Catholics who he says about the time of<lb/>the peace "were already half the number of those who <add>latterly</add> appeared<lb/>in arms", in a year or less he adds they might be <unclear>sent</unclear><lb/>one, for the Protestants were gradually quitting the service,<lb/>and the only apology <del>for those who c</del> <add>might be &#x2014; i.e. in his Lordship's opinion were, for it is of a period <!-- continues into margin --> which at the time<lb/>of his writing was <hi rend="underline">past</hi><lb/>that his Lordship speaks</add> (he continues) <add>goes on to say</add> for<lb/>those who continued after the peace was that they meant<lb/>to prevent the volunteer arms from falling into more dangerous<lb/> hands, and to counterbalance the Roman Catholics.  The<lb/>latter appeared sure of their plan and seemed already<lb/>to exult.</p> <p><del>The</del> For aught appears the volunteers <del>were</del> had still the<lb/>military possession of the whole country: and <add>in 1784</add> within a year <note>in this possessing<lb/>army</note><lb/>after the peace they were already ten to one.  They being<lb/>then in possession of the country, what then was to be expected<lb/>of them further?  That they should do as they had all along<lb/>done?  If no: but then they should do as they had<lb/>never done: that they should do as had been done by<lb/>others.  At what time?  140 years before, at a time of<lb/><add>general</add> barbarism.</p>                   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 11:36, 2 May 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jany 19
Radicalism not dangerous

§.10
III Experience
II Ireland

2 Sheffield against Reform

As the good conduct During this long period of probation, to exemplar the exemplary and unexampled
good conduct of the associated volunteers, the noble
Lord his with a that evidence that which is so honourable to himself bears that testimony which has been already brought to
view. But at the next step they entered upon the forbidden
ground of parliamentary reform.

How light in his experience is when
set against imagination no one a man could scarcely have conceived
had not his Lordship himself informed us.

Speaking of the Roman Catholics who he says about the time of
the peace "were already half the number of those who latterly appeared
in arms", in a year or less he adds they might be sent
one, for the Protestants were gradually quitting the service,
and the only apology for those who c might be — i.e. in his Lordship's opinion were, for it is of a period which at the time
of his writing was past
that his Lordship speaks
(he continues) goes on to say for
those who continued after the peace was that they meant
to prevent the volunteer arms from falling into more dangerous
hands, and to counterbalance the Roman Catholics. The
latter appeared sure of their plan and seemed already
to exult.

The For aught appears the volunteers were had still the
military possession of the whole country: and in 1784 within a year in this possessing
army

after the peace they were already ten to one. They being
then in possession of the country, what then was to be expected
of them further? That they should do as they had all along
done? If no: but then they should do as they had
never done: that they should do as had been done by
others. At what time? 140 years before, at a time of
general barbarism.




Identifier: | JB/137/358/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

358

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

47075

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in