JB/137/373/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/373/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/137/373/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/137/373/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/137/373/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- heading and marginal notes in pencil --> <head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 5<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p><note>Notes<lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(3) <note>Charlemont's treachery<lb/>Conclusion</note></p> <p>(i) [The legislature of their country] The legislature of their country!<lb/>Oh yes, but what legislature?  Let Lord Sheffield &#x2014; avowed <add>constant</add><lb/>partisan of <add>power in whatever hand</add> the Government &#x2014; avowed scorner <gap/><lb/>not to say hater of the subject many <add>he</add> informs us &#x2014; that legislature<lb/>by which [p. 362] "Ireland … had been infinitely more<lb/>"oppressed than America" infinitely more oppressed and<lb/>by what means?  by means of that destruction of political<lb/>power &#x2014; of that state of <del>the</del> popular representation, which<lb/>Lord Sheffield was so horrified at the apprehension of seeing<lb/>changed and which Lord Charlemont while professing a<lb/>zeal to see it changed, was taking those measures by<lb/>which he prevented it from being changed.</p> <p>Not that from any man in <del>his</del> the situation of<lb/>either of them any thing better could <add>without mental weakness</add> reasonably have been<lb/><del>expected.  But such is not the less the nature of the case</del><lb/>expected.  By perseverance on the part of the Volunteers &#x2014; by<lb/>their perseverance in the substitution of a <del>gover</del> form of<lb/>government subservient <add>conducive</add> to the interest of the subject many to<lb/>a form of government <del>hostile</del> measurably hostile to that interest,<lb/>they could not either of them have bettered their own<lb/>condition, they could not either of them have failed to<lb/>render it less eligible.  Nothing better obtained than a security<lb/> in which the "<gap/>" would have been <unclear>shared</unclear>, and for that despicable<lb/>security a share in the power of exercising oppression and depredation<lb/> <del>Security the delight of sharing in the <gap/> and profit</del><lb/>upon that same <add>at the expense</add> mob <del>was</del> would have been to be parted</p>     
<!-- heading and marginal notes in pencil --> <head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 5<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p><note>Notes<lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(3) <note>Charlemont's treachery<lb/>Conclusion</note></p> <p>(i) [the legislature of their country] The legislature of their country!<lb/>Oh yes, but what legislature?  Let Lord Sheffield &#x2014; avowed <add>constant</add><lb/>partisan of the Government <add>power in whatever hand</add> &#x2014; avowed scorner <unclear>continued</unclear><lb/>not to say hater of the subject many <add>here</add> informs us &#x2014; that legislature<lb/>by which [p. 362] "Ireland … had been infinitely more<lb/>"oppressed than America" infinitely more oppressed and<lb/>by what means?  by means of that destruction of political<lb/>power &#x2014; of that state of <del>the</del> popular representation, which<lb/>Lord Sheffield was so horrified at the apprehension of seeing<lb/>changed and which Lord Charlemont while professing a<lb/>zeal to see it changed, was taking those measures by<lb/>which he prevented it from being changed.</p> <p>Not that from any man in <del>his</del> the situation of<lb/>either of them any thing better could <add>without mental weakness</add> reasonably have been<lb/><del>expected.  But such is not the less the nature of the case</del><lb/>expected.  By perseverance on the part of the Volunteers &#x2014; by<lb/>their perseverance in the substitution of a <del>gover</del> form of<lb/>government subservient <add>conducive</add> to the interest of the subject many to<lb/>a form of government <del>hostile</del> incurably hostile to their interest,<lb/>they could not either of them have bettered their own<lb/>condition, they could not either of them have failed to<lb/>render it less eligible.  Nothing better obtained than a security<lb/> in which the "mob" would have been <unclear>shared</unclear>, and for that despicable<lb/> <del>Security the delight of sharing in the <gap/> and profit</del> <add>security a share in the power of exercising oppression and depredation</add><lb/>upon <add>at the expense</add> that same mob <del>was</del> would have been to be parted<lb/>with.</p>     




Line 8: Line 8:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 11:41, 5 May 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Feb. 5
Radicalism not dangerous

Notes
III Experience
II Ireland

(3) Charlemont's treachery
Conclusion

(i) [the legislature of their country] The legislature of their country!
Oh yes, but what legislature? Let Lord Sheffield — avowed constant
partisan of the Government power in whatever hand — avowed scorner continued
not to say hater of the subject many here informs us — that legislature
by which [p. 362] "Ireland … had been infinitely more
"oppressed than America" infinitely more oppressed and
by what means? by means of that destruction of political
power — of that state of the popular representation, which
Lord Sheffield was so horrified at the apprehension of seeing
changed and which Lord Charlemont while professing a
zeal to see it changed, was taking those measures by
which he prevented it from being changed.

Not that from any man in his the situation of
either of them any thing better could without mental weakness reasonably have been
expected. But such is not the less the nature of the case
expected. By perseverance on the part of the Volunteers — by
their perseverance in the substitution of a gover form of
government subservient conducive to the interest of the subject many to
a form of government hostile incurably hostile to their interest,
they could not either of them have bettered their own
condition, they could not either of them have failed to
render it less eligible. Nothing better obtained than a security
in which the "mob" would have been shared, and for that despicable
Security the delight of sharing in the and profit security a share in the power of exercising oppression and depredation
upon at the expense that same mob was would have been to be parted
with.




Identifier: | JB/137/373/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-02-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

373

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47090

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in