JB/137/386/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/386/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/137/386/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 1<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal note in pencil --><p>&sect;.16<lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland<note><lb/>(1) <note><gap/> Causes<lb/>Plowdens</note></p> <p>Plowden <del>II</del> <add><unclear>Anx</unclear></add> <unclear>I or III</unclear> p.431</p> <p>Radical<del>is</del> <add>and</add> reform of taking place.  Democratic ascendency<lb/>ceased.  Such are the known <add>notorious</add> results.  Fine <add>of these notorious</add> effects <del>lon</del><lb/>what were the causes?</p> <p>Many subordinate men have been brought <add>held up to view</add> or are discoverable;<lb/>but they are all absorbed in the original and principally<lb/>efficient one.  the opposition <del>between</del> <add>of</add> the interest of the<lb/>Elected leaders of the Associated and armed Volunteers, to that<lb/>of their Electors and Constituents: in a crowd of the aristocratical<lb/>interest to the <sic>democratical</sic> interest, of the interest of the<lb/>few to that of the many.  The few were in a condition to maintain <add>with or without <gap/> with the Monarchists</add><lb/> <del>a sufficient</del> among themselves a sufficient mien: and <del>to</del><lb/>with or without actual consent, to cooperate in a manner<lb/>suited <add>well adapted</add> to the attainment of the common end: the many<lb/>were not in any such condition. . <del>They</del> For the most part<lb/>they placed, as was natural, their confidence in the leaders<lb/>whom they had chosen: they trusted to their professions.  But<lb/>the professions were all fake, and it was with a predetermination<lb/>to frustrate all <gap/> <del>the extensively</del> <add>exclusively</add> barefaced<lb/>to the interest of the many, that the few <add>had</add> endeavoured or consented<lb/>to take the hand:  the Commander in chief in particular<lb/>as he in his own person as well as in that of his biographer<lb/>has informed us.</p> <p>Had the interest of the many <add>their <gap/></add> been the interest <del>let</del> preferred<lb/>by the leaders they would have been taken advantage of the state of<lb/>the Enemy they would have struck <del>with</del> while the nail was hot<lb/><del>they would have subdued the Parliament instead of</del> <add>while the Government, the real enemy, was still in a state of debility, and the French <!-- continues in margin --> their <sic>nomical</sic> enemies<lb/.but their real friends<lb/>were in force, and in<lb/>a state to give them support</add><lb/>without bloodshed without need so much as of that gentle force<lb/>by which Cromwell displaced the Long Parliament when they had<lb/>degenerated into a permanent Aristocracy they would have subdued<lb/>the Parliament instead of delivering up their constituents<lb/>to be subdued by it: to be subdued by it, and replaced in a <lb/>state of servitude and misrule not essentially different from that<lb/><add>from</add<lb/><!-- continues in margin --> from which <del>from</del> for the<lb/>moment they had been<lb/>liberated.</p>             
<head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 1<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal note in pencil --><p>&sect;.16<lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(1) <note><gap/> Causes<lb/>Plowdens</note></p> <p>Plowden <del>II</del> <add><unclear>Anx</unclear></add> <unclear>I or III</unclear> p.431</p> <p>Radical<del>is</del> reform <add>and</add> failed of taking place.  Democratic ascendency<lb/>ceased.  Such are the known <add>notorious</add> results.  Fine <add>of these notorious</add> effects <del>lon</del><lb/>what were the causes?</p> <p>Many subordinate men have been brought <add>held up to view</add> or are discoverable;<lb/>but they are all absorbed in the original and principally<lb/>efficient one.  the opposition <del>between</del> <add>of</add> the interest of the<lb/>Elected leaders of the Associated and armed Volunteers, to that<lb/>of their Electors and Constituents: in a crowd of the aristocratical<lb/>interest to the <sic>democratical</sic> interest, of the interest of the<lb/>few to that of the many.  The few were in a condition to maintain <add>with or without consent with the Monarchists</add><lb/> <del>a sufficient</del> among themselves a sufficient union: and <del>to</del><lb/>with or without actual consent, to cooperate in a manner<lb/>suited <add>well adapted</add> to the attainment of the common end: the many<lb/>were not in any such condition. . <del>They</del> For the most part<lb/>they placed, as was natural, their confidence in the leaders<lb/>whom they had chosen: they trusted to their professions.  But<lb/>the professions were all fake, and it was with a predetermination<lb/>to frustrate all measure <del>the extensively</del> <add>exclusively</add> beneficial<lb/>to the interest of the many, that the few <add>had</add> endeavoured or consented<lb/>to take the hand:  the Commander in chief in particular<lb/>as he in his own person as well as in that of his biographer<lb/>has informed us.</p> <p>Had the interest of the many <add>their constituents</add> been the interest <del>let</del> preferred<lb/>by the leaders they would have taken advantage of the state of<lb/>the Enemy: they would have struck <del>with</del> while the nail was hot<lb/><del>they would have subdued the Parliament instead of</del> <add>while the Government, the real enemy, was still in a state of debility, and the French <!-- continues in margin --> their <unclear>nominal</unclear> enemies<lb/>but their real friends<lb/>were in force, and in<lb/>a state to give them support</add><lb/>without bloodshed without need so much as of that gentle force<lb/>by which Cromwell displaced the Long Parliament when they had<lb/>degenerated into a permanent Aristocracy they would have subdued<lb/>the Parliament instead of delivering up their constituents<lb/>to be subdued by it: to be subdued by it, and replaced in a <lb/>state of servitude and misrule not essentially different from that<lb/><add>from</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin --> from which <del>from</del> for the<lb/>moment they had been<lb/>liberated.</p>             






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 13:30, 9 May 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Feb. 1
Radicalism not dangerous

§.16
III Experience
II Ireland

(1) Causes
Plowdens

Plowden II Anx I or III p.431

Radicalis reform and failed of taking place. Democratic ascendency
ceased. Such are the known notorious results. Fine of these notorious effects lon
what were the causes?

Many subordinate men have been brought held up to view or are discoverable;
but they are all absorbed in the original and principally
efficient one. the opposition between of the interest of the
Elected leaders of the Associated and armed Volunteers, to that
of their Electors and Constituents: in a crowd of the aristocratical
interest to the democratical interest, of the interest of the
few to that of the many. The few were in a condition to maintain with or without consent with the Monarchists
a sufficient among themselves a sufficient union: and to
with or without actual consent, to cooperate in a manner
suited well adapted to the attainment of the common end: the many
were not in any such condition. . They For the most part
they placed, as was natural, their confidence in the leaders
whom they had chosen: they trusted to their professions. But
the professions were all fake, and it was with a predetermination
to frustrate all measure the extensively exclusively beneficial
to the interest of the many, that the few had endeavoured or consented
to take the hand: the Commander in chief in particular
as he in his own person as well as in that of his biographer
has informed us.

Had the interest of the many their constituents been the interest let preferred
by the leaders they would have taken advantage of the state of
the Enemy: they would have struck with while the nail was hot
they would have subdued the Parliament instead of while the Government, the real enemy, was still in a state of debility, and the French their nominal enemies
but their real friends
were in force, and in
a state to give them support

without bloodshed without need so much as of that gentle force
by which Cromwell displaced the Long Parliament when they had
degenerated into a permanent Aristocracy they would have subdued
the Parliament instead of delivering up their constituents
to be subdued by it: to be subdued by it, and replaced in a
state of servitude and misrule not essentially different from that
from
from which from for the
moment they had been
liberated.




Identifier: | JB/137/386/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-02-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

386

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

47103

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in