JB/137/131/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/131/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
<note><!-- Pencil note -->II Nature of the case<lb/>
<note><!-- Pencil note -->II Nature of the case<lb/>
&sect;.9.IX Accomplishment impossible<lb/>
&sect;.9.IX Accomplishment impossible<lb/>
de<gap/>impossible</note><lb/>
design impossible</note><lb/>


<p><del>&sect;.3. IX. Accomplishment impossible design impossible</del></p>
<p><del>&sect;.3. IX. Accomplishment impossible design impossible</del></p>
Line 15: Line 15:
<p><del>&sect;.2. <add>Before to </add> <gap/> who Non-Adults or Adults only?</del></p>
<p><del>&sect;.2. <add>Before to </add> <gap/> who Non-Adults or Adults only?</del></p>


<p><del>Effect produced in the shares by <gap/> deaths and brother</del></p>
<p><del>Effect produced in the shares by <gap/> deaths and births</del></p>


<p><del>Before we can to the <add>brough view</add> connection of the need conceivable<lb/>
<p><del>Before we can to the <add>bring to view</add> connection of the need conceivable<lb/>
needs of <gap/> effecting the <add>partition</add> division and thence to shew the<lb/>
needs of <gap/> effecting the <add>partition</add> division and thence to shew the<lb/>
impossibility of it something must be said respecting the<lb/>
impossibility of it something must be said respecting the<lb/>
proportion disappear of the <hi rend="underline">sharers</hi>.  The proportion is to<lb/>
proportion disaptic of the <hi rend="underline">sharers</hi>.  The proportion is to<lb/>
be in the first place think of equably; equably, articles<lb/>
be in the first place think of equably; equably, as between<lb/>
each and each of the four individuals who was to according<lb/>
each and each of the four individuals who was to according<lb/>
to the design are to be admoitted <gap/> sharers</del></p>
to the design are to be individuals that are to the sharers</del></p>


<p><del>Proportion, equably: this is already settled.  Equality,<lb/>
<p><del>Proportion, equably: this is already settled.  Equality,<lb/>
but amongst whom? <gap/> in this equal proportion<lb/>
but amongst whom? <gap/> in this equal proportion<lb/>
what are to be the individuals that are to be the sharers?</del></p>
what are to be admitted are sharers?</del></p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>


Line 39: Line 39:
must be brought to view, and that is the smallness of<lb/>
must be brought to view, and that is the smallness of<lb/>
the <add>lot</add> <del><gap/></del> <del>which</del> by which in the character of a motive<lb/>
the <add>lot</add> <del><gap/></del> <del>which</del> by which in the character of a motive<lb/>
<del>that</del> the <del><gap/> <gap/></del> determination to embark on an<lb/>
<del>that</del> the <del>temptation was</del> determination to embark on an<lb/>
enterprize so full of personal hazard as well as difficulty<lb/>
enterprize so full of personal hazard as well as difficulty<lb/>
must have been produced.</p>
must have been produced.</p>

Revision as of 08:40, 12 May 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dece 11

Radicalism not dangerous

II Nature of the case
§.9.IX Accomplishment impossible
design impossible

§.3. IX. Accomplishment impossible design impossible

§.2. Before to who Non-Adults or Adults only?

Effect produced in the shares by deaths and births

Before we can to the bring to view connection of the need conceivable
needs of effecting the partition division and thence to shew the
impossibility of it something must be said respecting the
proportion disaptic of the sharers. The proportion is to
be in the first place think of equably; equably, as between
each and each of the four individuals who was to according
to the design are to be individuals that are to the sharers

Proportion, equably: this is already settled. Equality,
but amongst whom? in this equal proportion
what are to be admitted are sharers?


[+] As to the members of the individuals excluded
this may seem no great great loss: no Great increase to
the difficulty. But to those excluded individual
and inflexibly hostile individuals taking all the
meaning the difficulty is that a one. |

Before this topic is closed, one other circumstance
must be brought to view, and that is the smallness of
the lot which by which in the character of a motive
that the temptation was determination to embark on an
enterprize so full of personal hazard as well as difficulty
must have been produced.


[+]2 The means of opposition to the silence will be
next to compleat the means of support to the
will be next to nothing. [+]3

[+]1 The effect most has been intended to be produced
without any of the necessary means [+] [+]2

concerned and empty hands occupied of giving either or opposition or support being such silence. [+]1

10
Executive for the
design by the smallness
of the premium will be
all whose property
exceeds that amount:
all who have means

either of support or
opposition to the scheme

Before we process any further, on tence must
be presented to le view that is the smallness of the
by the persons in question are to be
an enterprize which before
seen to be fought well as
. By then can consideration stand
excluded from the writer of the possible associates in the design
all those who in possession of new inf and fixt expectancy.
have without this group a mass of property exceeding this the value of the lot.
the Instead
of supportive, all these
persons the the silence will
would of course have for its
after
inflexible opponents.
And in the land of these appears are not present all the possible money the concerned and empty hands occupied of giving either supposed or opperative being such silences [+]1



Identifier: | JB/137/131/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

10

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

131

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46848

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in