JB/137/397/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/397/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/137/397/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 30<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- all marginal notes in pencil --> <p>II. Experience</note><lb/>5 <note>II. Ireland</note></p> <p><note>11 or 3<lb/>Not to speak of democracy<lb/>when from<lb/><sic>democratical</sic> ascendency<lb/>none of information<lb/><gap/> injury to<lb/>prosperity, tranquillity<lb/> or morality, see what<lb/><del><gap/></del> grounds their<lb/>saying so affords for<lb/>believing that they think<lb/>so</note></p> <p>In Ireland for 4 years <gap/> in undemocratic<lb/><gap/> <gap/>.  In <gap/> <gap/> for 40 years together acted<lb/><gap/>,</p> <p>After <add>No to speak of pure democracy</add> what has here been seen, when men having any<lb/>tolerable insight into the nature of government <add>in general</add> and the<lb/>state of the country in particular are observed to say<lb/>that from democratic ascendency any detriment <!-- addition in pencil  --> <add>injury</add> to <del>social</del><lb/>the <del>happiness of the</del> prosperity, the tranquillity or the morality of the<lb/>people would be more likely to insure them from the contrivance<lb/>of the government in its present state, &#x2014; that the impractical reader<lb/>may judge whether their saying so affords any grounds for believing<lb/>that they think so</p> <p><note>12 or 4<lb/>So whether Grattan<lb/.could think as he<lb/>spoke.  Grattan sitting<lb/.always for one of<lb/>Charlemonts two seats<lb/>acted consequently in<lb/>concert with him on<lb/>putting down radicalism<lb/. in Ireland</note></p><p><note>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/> 1783<lb/>Charlemont by adjournment<lb/.virtually defeated<lb/>the Convention with<lb/>which the prosperity<lb/>tranquillity and morality<lb/.of Ireland<lb/>expired.</note></p> <p>Mr Grattan was the confidential friend of the <add><sic>Ld</sic></add> Earl of<lb/>Charlemont: it was by that patron that he had been brought<lb/>into Parliament: Lord Charlemont in <gap/> of the borough<lb/>of that name had two seats, and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Grattan sat in<lb/>one of them.  After <del>the</del> his first <gap/> which was on<lb/>17 <!-- blank space --> <gap/> he <del><gap/>,/del> even after <gap/> their joint <gap/>, and<lb/><del><gap/</del> change of Parliament continued to do so as of<lb/>course.</p> <p><note>13 or 5<lb/>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/><lb/>178 .  Grattan spoke<lb/> against radicalism a<lb/>set speech: as per<lb/>Plowden from Irish<lb/.parliamentary debates.</note></p> <p><del>The day</del> While the Convention <add>chosen by universal suffrage</add> sat, the paramount power<lb/>of the country was in the hands of the universal suffragists<lb/>the Irish <sic>radicalists</sic> of that time. On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/><lb/><add>it was that Lord Charlemont as</add>the President of that body procured <del>the adjournment</del> under<lb/>the notion of its being but temporary this adjournment<lb/>from which the expiration of democratic ascendency<lb/>with the prosperity, tranquillity and morality which<lb/>had been the never disputed accompaniments of it, expired.</p> <p><del>On the <gap/> of <gap/> 17<gap/> it was that Mr Grattan<lb/>stood up and delivered against that <gap/><lb/>and universally known instrument if every thing that was <gap> allow<lb/>that was <gap/> in <add>and</add> government and morality a set speech,<lb/>of which Mr Hardy's loss of Charlemonts [+] gave me a copy from <note>[+] Plowdens  History of Ireland<lb/>Parliamentary<lb/>Debates.</del></p>             
<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 30<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- all marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>II. Experience</note><lb/>5 <note>II. Ireland</note></p> <p><note>11 or 3<lb/>Not to speak of democracy,<lb/>when from<lb/><sic>democratical</sic> ascendency<lb/>none of information<lb/>predict injury to<lb/>prosperity, tranquillity<lb/> or morality, see what<lb/><del><gap/></del> grounds their<lb/>saying so affords for<lb/>believing that they think<lb/>so</note></p> <p>In Ireland for 4 years <gap/> in undemocratic<lb/><gap/> <gap/>.  In <gap/> <gap/> for 40 years together acted<lb/><gap/>,</p> <p><add>Not to speak of pure democracy</add> After what has here been seen, when men having any<lb/>tolerable insight into the nature of government <add>in general</add> and the<lb/>state of the country in particular are observed to say<lb/>that from democratic ascendency any detriment <!-- addition in pencil  --> <add>injury</add> to <del>social</del><lb/>the <del>happiness of the</del> prosperity, the tranquillity or the morality of the<lb/>people would be more likely to insure them from the contrivance<lb/>of the government in its present state, &#x2014; that the impractical reader<lb/>may judge whether their saying so affords any grounds for believing<lb/>that they think so</p> <p><note>12 or 4<lb/>See whether Grattan<lb/>could think as he<lb/>spoke.  Grattan sitting<lb/>always for one of<lb/>Charlemonts two seats<lb/>acted consequently in<lb/>concert with him on<lb/>putting down radicalism<lb/> in Ireland</note></p><p><note>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/> 1783<lb/>Charlemont by adjournment<lb/>virtually defeated<lb/>the Convention with<lb/>which the prosperity<lb/>tranquillity and morality<lb/>of Ireland<lb/>expired.</note></p> <p>Mr Grattan was the confidential friend of the <add><sic>Ld</sic></add> Earl of<lb/>Charlemont: it was by that patron that he had been brought<lb/>into Parliament: Lord Charlemont in virtue of the borough<lb/>of that name had two seats, and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Grattan sat in<lb/>one of them.  After <del>the</del> his first intrusion which was on<lb/>17 <!-- blank space --> <gap/> he <del>each</del> ever after during their joint time, and<lb/><del>every</del> change of Parliament continued to do so as of<lb/>course.</p> <p><note>13 or 5<lb/>On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/><lb/>178 .  Grattan spoke<lb/> against radicalism a<lb/>set speech: as per<lb/>Plowden from Irish<lb/>parliamentary debates.</note></p> <p><del>The day</del> While the Convention <add>chosen by universal suffrage</add> sat, the paramount power<lb/>of the country was in the hands of the universal suffragists<lb/>the Irish <sic>radicalists</sic> of that time. On the <!-- blank space --> <gap/> of <!-- blank space --> <gap/><lb/><add>it was that Lord Charlemont as</add>the President of that body procured <del>the adjournment</del> under<lb/>the notion of its being but temporary this adjournment<lb/>from which the expiration of democratic ascendency<lb/>with the prosperity, tranquillity and morality which<lb/>had been the never disputed accompaniments of it, expired.</p> <p><del>On the <gap/> of <gap/> 17<gap/> it was that M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Grattan<lb/>stood up and <gap/> delivered against that undisputed<lb/>and universally known instrument if every thing that was <gap/> allow<lb/>that was <gap/> in <add>either</add> government and <add>or</add> morality a set speech,<lb/>of which Mr Hardy's life of Charlemont <add>[+]</add> <note>[+] Plowdens  History of Ireland<lb/>Parliamentary<lb/>Debates.</note> gives in a copy from the Irish</del> </p>             






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 10:45, 13 May 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Nov. 30
Radicalism not

II. Experience
5 II. Ireland

11 or 3
Not to speak of democracy,
when from
democratical ascendency
none of information
predict injury to
prosperity, tranquillity
or morality, see what
grounds their
saying so affords for
believing that they think
so

In Ireland for 4 years in undemocratic
. In for 40 years together acted
,

Not to speak of pure democracy After what has here been seen, when men having any
tolerable insight into the nature of government in general and the
state of the country in particular are observed to say
that from democratic ascendency any detriment injury to social
the happiness of the prosperity, the tranquillity or the morality of the
people would be more likely to insure them from the contrivance
of the government in its present state, — that the impractical reader
may judge whether their saying so affords any grounds for believing
that they think so

12 or 4
See whether Grattan
could think as he
spoke. Grattan sitting
always for one of
Charlemonts two seats
acted consequently in
concert with him on
putting down radicalism
in Ireland

On the of 1783
Charlemont by adjournment
virtually defeated
the Convention with
which the prosperity
tranquillity and morality
of Ireland
expired.

Mr Grattan was the confidential friend of the Ld Earl of
Charlemont: it was by that patron that he had been brought
into Parliament: Lord Charlemont in virtue of the borough
of that name had two seats, and Mr Grattan sat in
one of them. After the his first intrusion which was on
17 he each ever after during their joint time, and
every change of Parliament continued to do so as of
course.

13 or 5
On the of
178 . Grattan spoke
against radicalism a
set speech: as per
Plowden from Irish
parliamentary debates.

The day While the Convention chosen by universal suffrage sat, the paramount power
of the country was in the hands of the universal suffragists
the Irish radicalists of that time. On the of
it was that Lord Charlemont asthe President of that body procured the adjournment under
the notion of its being but temporary this adjournment
from which the expiration of democratic ascendency
with the prosperity, tranquillity and morality which
had been the never disputed accompaniments of it, expired.

On the of 17 it was that Mr Grattan
stood up and delivered against that undisputed
and universally known instrument if every thing that was allow
that was in either government and or morality a set speech,
of which Mr Hardy's life of Charlemont [+] [+] Plowdens History of Ireland
Parliamentary
Debates.
gives in a copy from the Irish




Identifier: | JB/137/397/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-11-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

11 or 3 - 13 or 5

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

397

Info in main headings field

radicalism not

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47114

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in