★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<p><note>Art. 6</note> <unclear>The definition</unclear> and the only material differences <gap/> to be <gap/> indicate regard <unclear>for the</unclear> <unclear>two</unclear> following cases. 1. This person by whom the suggestion is made, as the one individual other than <unclear>the</unclear> Judge is as has <del><gap/></del> <add>a</add> <del><gap/></del> Judge. If a Judge <unclear>has been</unclear> a Judge having <add>actual</add> experience of the matter, as a Judge at <unclear>Georgia</unclear>: in ultimate <gap/> no finding has <gap/> in the respect is said very materially different from Kant of the individual <add><gap/></add> at large. 2. If a Judge having experience of the matter, it must be, <del>for the reason</del> <add><gap/></add> of <gap/> to be confirmed to act <unclear>generously</unclear>, to the collect consequences of an <gap/> already <unclear>demonstrated</unclear> <!-- could also be 'mentioned' -->, <add>in relation to the <gap/> matter</add> as antecedently to essay much not already instituted. <!-- constituents? --></p> | <p><note>Art. 6</note> <unclear>The definition</unclear> and the only material differences <gap/> to be <gap/> indicate regard <unclear>for the</unclear> <unclear>two</unclear> following cases. 1. This person by whom the suggestion is made, as the one individual other than <unclear>the</unclear> Judge is as has <del><gap/></del> <add>a</add> <del><gap/></del> Judge. If a Judge <unclear>has been</unclear> a Judge having <add>actual</add> experience of the matter, as a Judge at <unclear>Georgia</unclear>: in ultimate <gap/> no finding has <gap/> in the respect is said very materially different from Kant of the individual <add><gap/></add> at large. 2. If a Judge having experience of the matter, it must be, <del>for the reason</del> <add><gap/></add> of <gap/> to be confirmed to act <unclear>generously</unclear>, to the collect consequences of an <gap/> already <unclear>demonstrated</unclear> <!-- could also be 'mentioned' -->, <add>in relation to the <gap/> matter</add> as antecedently to essay much not already instituted. <!-- constituents? --></p> | ||
<p>In either of these cases</p> | <p>In either of these cases the exercise of the practice by <add>on the part of</add> the Judge <del><gap/></del> is in the <unclear>nature</unclear><!-- could also be "ratio" or "nation" --> of the case dependent upon the act of an individual at <unclear>large</unclear> namely the applicant <gap/> state of things as the others, calls <gap/< the Judge to <del><gap/></del> to give exercise to his authority — </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
1824. April 21
Constitutional Code.
Ch. 5. Judiciary Collectively.
Art. 5 In some cases it may be matter of more or less difficulty for a man to satisfy himself whether it is in design is in the ordinance made in of it, used the impugned imperfection has in : but so long as in any case, any person also pleases so to understand is at liberty to indicate the impugned imperfection, and perhaps that on law view of the matter as the most apt remedy, on this the uncertainty no practical inconvenience seems capable of unable to resulting from it.
Art. 6 The definition and the only material differences to be indicate regard for the two following cases. 1. This person by whom the suggestion is made, as the one individual other than the Judge is as has a Judge. If a Judge has been a Judge having actual experience of the matter, as a Judge at Georgia: in ultimate no finding has in the respect is said very materially different from Kant of the individual at large. 2. If a Judge having experience of the matter, it must be, for the reason of to be confirmed to act generously, to the collect consequences of an already demonstrated , in relation to the matter as antecedently to essay much not already instituted.
In either of these cases the exercise of the practice by on the part of the Judge is in the nature of the case dependent upon the act of an individual at large namely the applicant state of things as the others, calls <gap/< the Judge to to give exercise to his authority —
|
Identifier: | JB/042/405/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-04-02 |
5-7 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
405 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
13328 |
|||
