JB/071/050/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/050/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/050/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/050/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<note>32</note>
<head>C</head><lb/>
<head>Of Theft</head><lb/>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>2.  Because <del>persons</del> offenders would by <del><gap/></del> artifices<lb/> <del>which very</del> frequently could <del><gap/><gap/></del> undiscoverable<lb/> <del>would</del> give themselves an apparent<lb/> claim to this exemption, where a real <unclear>one</unclear><lb/>was wanting: and by this means practice the<lb/> offence with impunity.</p><lb/>
 
<p>3.  Because the quantum of the necessity which<lb/> contributes the extenuation varies by inscrutible<lb/>degrees:  so that there is no saying that in this<lb/> case the excuse is completely valid, but in<lb/> the <unclear>nearest</unclear> is it that can be imagined, then<lb/> excuse would not be valid.  It is very seldom<lb/> that one can say of a man who has stolen<lb/> a loaf of bread for instance, <add>or</add> "had he not stolen<lb/> that loaf nothing could have saved him."<lb/>  But promise <add>is made</add> even for their non case by making<lb/> the <unclear>1</unclear> circumstance a ground of extenuation:<lb/> at least so long as there is a spark<lb/> of humanity in the judge.</p> <head>Question XII</head><lb/>  <p>Why spontaneous restitution is made a<lb/> ground of extenuation?</p><head>Reasons</head><lb/> 1.  <p>Because of proportionality diminishes the mischief<lb/> of the offence - <del>And</del> Per Introd. Ch. of Proportion]<lb/> Rule  <gap/><gap/>  when a man has made</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:33, 18 September 2011

Click Here To Edit 32 C
Of Theft

2. Because persons offenders would by artifices
which very frequently could undiscoverable
would give themselves an apparent
claim to this exemption, where a real one
was wanting: and by this means practice the
offence with impunity.


3. Because the quantum of the necessity which
contributes the extenuation varies by inscrutible
degrees: so that there is no saying that in this
case the excuse is completely valid, but in
the nearest is it that can be imagined, then
excuse would not be valid. It is very seldom
that one can say of a man who has stolen
a loaf of bread for instance, or "had he not stolen
that loaf nothing could have saved him."
But promise is made even for their non case by making
the 1 circumstance a ground of extenuation:
at least so long as there is a spark
of humanity in the judge.

Question XII

Why spontaneous restitution is made a
ground of extenuation?

Reasons
1.

Because of proportionality diminishes the mischief
of the offence - And Per Introd. Ch. of Proportion]
Rule when a man has made



Identifier: | JB/071/050/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

050

Info in main headings field

of theft reasons

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f29 / f30 / f31 / f32

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23453

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in