JB/071/051/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/051/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/051/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/051/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>34</note>


<head>C</head><lb/><head>Of Theft</head><lb/>
<p>drove him into the commission of the crime is at<lb/> an end:  money of his own <unclear>comes</unclear> in, or some<lb/> friend in order to extricate him gives him a<lb/> voluntary supply: the party injured is satisfied, the<lb/> story is hushed up, and the offence is as if it<lb/> had never been.</p><lb/>  <head>Quest. XIII</head><lb/>  <p>Why spontaneous restitution is not made a<lb/> ground of <del><gap/></del> absolute exemption.</p><lb/><head>Reasons</head><lb/>.  1.  Because if it were, it would be an encouragement<lb/> to the commission of the offence.  If a man<lb/> had it in his power at any time to exempt himself<lb/> upon such terms, men who felt themselves<lb/> <del>under a compulsion</del> tempted to be dishonest would be continually<lb/> for taking their chance:  and especially <del>where</del> who<lb/><del>reputation was <gap/></del> saw their reputation gone, or <lb/> thought it would be of no use to them.  In such<lb/>case <del>if after the offence was committed</del> so long<lb/> as there appeared no danger of a discovery <add>a man</add> <del>he</del><lb/> would keep the goods:  if such danger appeared<lb/><del>then</del> he would restore them, and then he would be<lb/>back where he was, ready to try his chance a <lb/> second time.  <del>Where the non <gap/> of</del>  Make the indemnity depend upon <add>the</add>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:33, 18 September 2011

Click Here To Edit

34

C
Of Theft

drove him into the commission of the crime is at
an end: money of his own comes in, or some
friend in order to extricate him gives him a
voluntary supply: the party injured is satisfied, the
story is hushed up, and the offence is as if it
had never been.


Quest. XIII

Why spontaneous restitution is not made a
ground of absolute exemption.


Reasons
. 1. Because if it were, it would be an encouragement
to the commission of the offence. If a man
had it in his power at any time to exempt himself
upon such terms, men who felt themselves
under a compulsion tempted to be dishonest would be continually
for taking their chance: and especially where who
reputation was saw their reputation gone, or
thought it would be of no use to them. In such
case if after the offence was committed so long
as there appeared no danger of a discovery a man he
would keep the goods: if such danger appeared
then he would restore them, and then he would be
back where he was, ready to try his chance a
second time. Where the non of Make the indemnity depend upon the



Identifier: | JB/071/051/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

051

Info in main headings field

of theft

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f33 / f34 / f35 / f36

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23454

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in