★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 10<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>II. Ireland</note><lb/>5</p> <p><note>12<lb/>3. Equality. Exact demarcation<lb/>of Districts<lb/>for the purpose, none<lb/>Neither time nor law<lb/>permitted. But from<lb/>the universality follows<lb/>practical equality<lb/>as far as was<lb/>effectual, no regulation<lb/>stood in the way<lb/>of it.</note></p> <p>3. Equality <add>of suffrage;</add> namely between individual and individual all<lb/>over the territory, <del>as between <gap/> and</del> <add> in respect of the</add> effect and value of<lb/>the right of suffrage: the results of division into districts<lb/> quantity of population in each <add>every</add> district, as far <add>nearly</add> the same<lb/>as the necessary regard to local circumstance, and the changing<lb/><add>constantly and<lb/>every abuse made on the particulars by him would <add>will</add><lb/><sic>admit.</sic> So far as depends upon demarcation of<lb/>Districts any such equality it will plainly be seen cases<lb/>impossible. For the association not being forced by law or<lb/><add>in certain places</add> for the purpose of permanence, those were no means of<lb/>marking <add>them</add> out the districts. But the aggregate border of the<lb/<gap/> being every where associated by free choice, <del>these are</del><lb/><del>throughout</del> <add>the</add> equality in question had place in <gap/> far<lb/>as the case admitted of it, and <add>it</add> met with no obstruction from<lb/>the force of law.</p> <p><note>13<lb/><sic>Annuality.</sic> No exactly<lb/>as proposed.<lb/>But <add>potential</add> frequency of<lb/>renewal still greater. At any time each<lb/>body of electors would<lb/>choose their delegates.<lb/><add>suppose</add> Disposition to disturbance,<lb/>that state<lb/> of things still more<lb/>favourable to the exercise<lb/> of it.</note></p> <p>3. <sic>Annuality</sic> of suffrage. So the case in question as shall <add> on a liberal muse</add> <lb/><add>not</add> find not indeed <sic>annuality</sic> of <gap/> established. What<lb/>we shall find is however <add>still</add> more democratic, still more dangerous<lb/>if there were any such danger to <add>peace and</add> tranquillity: the<lb/>voters being in the exercise of that then familiar not one day<lb/>only in the year, but every day <del>every day</del> in each one of the<lb/>component bodies, the Electors <del>capable</del> having in their power at<lb/>all times to change their respective delegates as well as their<lb/>respective leaders.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1820 Jan. 10
Radicalism not dangerous
2o
II. Ireland
5
12
3. Equality. Exact demarcation
of Districts
for the purpose, none
Neither time nor law
permitted. But from
the universality follows
practical equality
as far as was
effectual, no regulation
stood in the way
of it.
3. Equality of suffrage; namely between individual and individual all
over the territory, as between and in respect of the effect and value of
the right of suffrage: the results of division into districts
quantity of population in each every district, as far nearly the same
as the necessary regard to local circumstance, and the changing
constantly and
every abuse made on the particulars by him would <add>will
admit. So far as depends upon demarcation of
Districts any such equality it will plainly be seen cases
impossible. For the association not being forced by law or
in certain places for the purpose of permanence, those were no means of
marking them out the districts. But the aggregate border of the<lb/ being every where associated by free choice, these are
throughout the equality in question had place in far
as the case admitted of it, and it met with no obstruction from
the force of law.
13
Annuality. No exactly
as proposed.
But potential frequency of
renewal still greater. At any time each
body of electors would
choose their delegates.
suppose Disposition to disturbance,
that state
of things still more
favourable to the exercise
of it.
3. Annuality of suffrage. So the case in question as shall on a liberal muse
not find not indeed annuality of established. What
we shall find is however still more democratic, still more dangerous
if there were any such danger to peace and tranquillity: the
voters being in the exercise of that then familiar not one day
only in the year, but every day every day in each one of the
component bodies, the Electors capable having in their power at
all times to change their respective delegates as well as their
respective leaders.
|
Identifier: | JB/137/419/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-01-10 |
12-13 |
||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
419 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
47136 |
|||
