★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 13<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>+ + 6 <note>3<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>4 <note>§.1. Historical Sketch</note></p> | |||
<p><del>At the conjunction in question the prosperity</del> <add>Thus <del>it was that</del> the subsistence</add> of the subject<lb/>money and the power of the ruling few, being in that <del>extent</del> <add>subject country</add><lb/>kept in a state of depression by the <del><gap/> of the <add><gap/></add> </del> same cause, two <!-- continues into margin --> interests, which, in the<lb/>whole of the <del>new</del> <add>now</add> United<lb/>Kingdom, are in a <lb/>state of such <del><gap/></del><lb/>disastrous operation,<lb/>even in that<lb/> part of it <del>first</del> in<lb/>a state of reason, <del>sufficient<lb/>for</del> adequate to<lb/>the purpose of <del><gap/></del> <add>efficient</add><lb/><del>and</del> salutary <add>and efficient</add> cooperation.<lb/> <del>When the<lb/><gap/> which</del> the boon<lb/>which the subject<lb/>many would naturally<lb/> be most sensible to the<lb/>want of, was freedom<lb/>for their trade: the boom<lb/><del>which the rioting few <add>subject many</add><lb/>would naturally be most<lb/>the want of which would<lb/>naturally be most <gap/><lb/>to the subject many, was<lb/>freedom for their trade; the</del><lb/>boom which the ruling few<lb/>would naturally be most<lb/>sensible to the want of<lb/>was independence for<lb/.their power: but on both<lb/>points the union of interest<lb/>was sufficiently manifest.</p> <!-- first five lines crossed through and then whole section crossed though in ink --> <p><del><add>In that Plan</add> The interests of <gap/> <gap/> and <add>those</add> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>all but <add>with the exception only of <gap/> those of</add> but the ruling <gap/> were at the time happily enjoined)<lb/>in a state of happy <gap> unison. <add>in the state of <gap/> <gap/></add> The <gap/> people</del><lb/>would <add>needed</add> and felt the want of was summed up in two<lb/>words, a <hi rend="underline">free trade</hi>: what the Members of both Houses<lb/>wanted, and felt the desire of was exercise of power:<lb/>that exercise of power which would be result of their<lb/>acquisition of right of <gap/> him and thereby<lb/>while they were placed in this respect in Ireland upon<lb/>the same footing with that possessed by their <del>fellow</del> <add> respective <del><gap/></del><lb/>namesakes in authority in England, <del><gap/></del> changing<lb/>,their corporate condition from <add>that of</add> dependence to <add>that of</add> independence<lb/>The difference between <gap/> trade and free trade <gap/> most<lb/><gap/> was most particularly sensible to the people: the<lb/>difference between dependent and independent power was<lb/>most particularly sensible to the Members of their two<lb/>Houses of Parliament: but in both benefits both classes<lb/>were <add>would be</add> sharers.</p><!-- end of crossed through section --> <p>Under these circumstances, all <del><gap/></del> <add>desires</add> being in unison<lb/>no wonder <del>that</del> the people at large looked <del>to the couple<lb/><gap/> and <gap/> to the <add>the</add> </del>men in <add><del>in elected</del></add> authority for <del>their</del> leaders.<lb/>No <del><gap/><del> wonder that <del>for a time the</del> in the eyes of the<lb/>ruling few the subject many ceased <add>for the moment to be swine.</add> <del>to be a <gap/> multitude</del><lb/><!-- remaining text crossed through in ink, brackets in pencil --> [So long as <del>pow</del> rank power <add>factitious dignity</add> and <gap/> injurious<lb/>exist, nay, long as <add>even>add> <gap/> though without these accompaniments<lb/>exists so long it will command not only the<lb/>magnitude but the affections of the <add>less <del><gap/></del> prosperous <del>in favour</del> multitude]</p> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>11 continued<lb/>27.9. Most sensible to the<lb/>many, <del><gap/></del> want of freedom<lb/>for trade; to the few, want<lb/>o9f independence for power:<lb/>but to both community of<lb/>interests manifest.</note>,/p> <p><note>12<lb/>28.10. No wonder people<lb/>looked to authority for<lb/>leaders; and to ruling few<lb/>people ceased for the<lb/>moment to be servile.</note></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1820 Jan. 13
Radicalism not dangerous
+ + 6 3o
III Experience
II Ireland
4 §.1. Historical Sketch
At the conjunction in question the prosperity Thus it was that the subsistence of the subject
money and the power of the ruling few, being in that extent subject country
kept in a state of depression by the of the same cause, two interests, which, in the
whole of the new now United
Kingdom, are in a
state of such
disastrous operation,
even in that
part of it first in
a state of reason, sufficient
for adequate to
the purpose of efficient
and salutary and efficient cooperation.
When the
which the boon
which the subject
many would naturally
be most sensible to the
want of, was freedom
for their trade: the boom
which the rioting few subject many
would naturally be most
the want of which would
naturally be most
to the subject many, was
freedom for their trade; the
boom which the ruling few
would naturally be most
sensible to the want of
was independence for<lb/.their power: but on both
points the union of interest
was sufficiently manifest.
In that Plan The interests of and those the
all but with the exception only of those of but the ruling were at the time happily enjoined)
in a state of happy <gap> unison. in the state of The people
would needed and felt the want of was summed up in two
words, a free trade: what the Members of both Houses
wanted, and felt the desire of was exercise of power:
that exercise of power which would be result of their
acquisition of right of him and thereby
while they were placed in this respect in Ireland upon
the same footing with that possessed by their fellow respective
namesakes in authority in England, changing
,their corporate condition from <add>that of dependence to that of independence
The difference between trade and free trade most
was most particularly sensible to the people: the
difference between dependent and independent power was
most particularly sensible to the Members of their two
Houses of Parliament: but in both benefits both classes
were would be sharers.
Under these circumstances, all desires being in unison
no wonder that the people at large looked to the couple
and to the the men in in elected authority for their leaders.
No wonder that in the eyes of thefor a time the
ruling few the subject many ceased for the moment to be swine. to be a multitude
[So long as pow rank power factitious dignity and injurious
exist, nay, long as <add>even>add> though without these accompaniments
exists so long it will command not only the
magnitude but the affections of the <add>less prosperous in favour multitude]
11 continued
27.9. Most sensible to the
many, want of freedom
for trade; to the few, want
o9f independence for power:
but to both community of
interests manifest.,/p>
12
28.10. No wonder people
looked to authority for
leaders; and to ruling few
people ceased for the
moment to be servile.
|
Identifier: | JB/137/429/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-01-13 |
11 continued, 12 |
||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
429 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d6 / e4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
47146 |
|||
