JB/137/433/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:56, 25 May 2020

1820 Jan 15
Radicalism not dangerous

9
III Experience
II Ireland
2

or 5
Charlemont head of
Irish Whigs. Hardy's
affections and homage
popular; openly as far as
Whiggism permitted
Plowden still more
decidedly.

All points taken together Lord Charlemont was indisputably the first man
among the Whigs in Ireland. Of Mr Hardy As far
as Whiggism permitted, and could permitt admitt of a a man
among Mr Hardy's affection and having appear to have been
openly declaredly and perhaps were still further secretly, on
the side of the people.

Mr Plowden, to judge from his history even
still more decidedly so.

or 6
Hence Adolphus
employed brought to
view as a check
his leanings as strongly
opposite as could be
found.

Thus considered, lest misrepresentation, has
unintentionally so ever should, in any particular, be
the result, a history was has been looked out for, the pennage to act as a check
of which should be as decidedly as possible, on the opposite
side: in this their character the history to which
I my views have happened to been directed is considered was that of Mr Adolphus
as abovementioned.

Identifier: \| JB/137/433/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.
Date_1	1820-01-15	Marginal Summary Numbering	or 5 - or 6
Box	137	Main Headings	radicalism not dangerous
Folio number	433	Info in main headings field	radicalism not dangerous
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d9 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	47150
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>1820 <sic>Jan</sic> 15<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>9<lb/>>note>III Experience<lb/.II Ireland</note><lb/>2</p> <p><note>or 5<lb/>Charlemont head of<lb/>Irish Whigs.  Hardy's<lb/>affections and homage<lb/>popular; <add>openly</add> as far as<lb/><sic>Whiggism</sic> <gap/.<lb/>Plowden still more<lb/>decidedly.</note></p> <p><add>All points taken together</add> Lord Charlemont was indisputably the first man<lb/>among the Whigs in Ireland.   <del>of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy</del> As far<lb/>as <sic>Whiggism</sic> permitted, <del>and</del> could <sic>permitt</sic> <add><sic>admitt</sic> of a</add> a man<lb/> among M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy's affection <del><gap/></del> <add>and having</ad> appear to have been<lb/>openly <add><gap/></add> and perhaps were still further directly, on<lb/>the side of the people.</p> <p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Plowden, to judge from his history were<lb/>still more decidedly so.</p> <p><note>or 6<lb/>Hence Adolphus<lb/><del>employed</del> brought to<lb/>view as a check<lb/>his leanings as strongly<lb/>opposite as could be<lb/>found.</note></p>  <p>Thus considered, lest <del><gap/></del> misrepresentation, have<lb/><del><gap/></del> <add>unintentionally</add> so ever should, in any particular, be<lb/>the result, a history <del>was</del> <add>has been</add> <gap/> out for, the <gap/><lb/>of which should be as decidedly as possible, on the opposite<lb/>side: in this <del>their</del> character the history to which<lb/><del>I</del> my views <add>have <del>happened to</del> been directed is</add> <del>considered</del> that of Mr Adolphus<lb/>as abovementioned.</p>
+<head>1820 <sic>Jan</sic> 15<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>9<lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>2</p> <p><note>or 5<lb/>Charlemont head of<lb/>Irish Whigs.  Hardy's<lb/>affections and homage<lb/>popular; <add>openly</add> as far as<lb/><sic>Whiggism</sic> permitted<lb/>Plowden still more<lb/>decidedly.</note></p> <p><add>All points taken together</add> Lord Charlemont was indisputably the first man<lb/>among the Whigs in Ireland.   <del>Of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy</del> As far<lb/>as <sic>Whiggism</sic> permitted, <del>and</del> could <sic>permitt</sic> <add><sic>admitt</sic> of a</add> a <unclear>man</unclear><lb/> among M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy's affection <del><gap/></del> <add>and having</add> appear to have been<lb/>openly <add><unclear>declaredly</unclear></add> and perhaps were still further secretly, on<lb/>the side of the people.</p> <p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Plowden, to judge from his history even<lb/>still more decidedly so.</p> <p><note>or 6<lb/>Hence Adolphus<lb/><del>employed</del> brought to<lb/>view as a check<lb/>his leanings as strongly<lb/>opposite as could be<lb/>found.</note></p>  <p>Thus considered, lest <del><gap/></del> misrepresentation, has<lb/><del><gap/></del> <add>unintentionally</add> so ever should, in any particular, be<lb/>the result, a history <del>was</del> <add>has been</add> looked out for, the <unclear>pennage</unclear> <note>to act as a check</note><lb/>of which should be as decidedly as possible, on the opposite<lb/>side: in this <del>their</del> character the history to which<lb/><del>I</del> my views <add>have <del>happened to</del> been directed is</add> <del>considered was</del> that of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Adolphus<lb/>as abovementioned.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/137/433/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:56, 25 May 2020

Navigation

Search