★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 22<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>+ <lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>§. <gap/> leaders</note></p> <p><note>or 1<lb/>Position 1. Leaders<lb/>aristocratic disproves,<lb/>not ascendency democratic:<lb/>this being proved<lb/>above.</note></p> <p><!-- in pencil --> (1)<lb/>Position</p> <p>The fact, that the Volunteers <add>universally or generally</add> had for their<lb/>leaders, look for their commanders men in the higher and<lb/>even in the highest ranks of <add>in</add> life, does not prove that<lb/>the ascendency thus produced <add>obtained</add> was <!-- in pencil --><add>not</add> democratic ascendency<lb/>that the Volunteers were in corresponding proposition<lb/>of such as would have votes under a system<lb/>of virtually universal suffrage. For that <del>there it</del> as<lb/>far as appears there is reason <add>sufficient reason in favour of the affirmative</add> for thinking that they ever<lb/>have just been made apparent.</p> <p><note>or 2<lb/>2. But prove that,<lb/>affectives supposes<lb/>accordant, chance of<lb/>being direct is as<lb/>height in <gap/> of<lb/>power, factitious dignity<lb/>and opulence</note></p> <p>On the other hand what it does prove is <add>afford an example</add> and that<lb/>most incontestably is that it is in the nature of the<lb/>case that by the great body of the people — by the<lb/>lower orders — by the subject many <add>the chance which on one occasion of this sort or <del><gap/><?del> man who</add> all furious who<lb/>are not regarded as hostile in their affection hostile<lb/>to the supposed <add>what is regarded as the</add> interest and is thereby conformable <add>consonant</add> to<lb/>the interest of the people has of becoming the object<lb/>of their <gap/> is always <sic>encreased</sic>by the height<lb/>which his condition in life has on the joint seals<lb/>of power, factitious dignity and opulence.</p> <p>>note>or 3<lb/> 3. This is sufficient<lb/>assurance against<lb/fears of subversion<lb/>of property</note></p> <p>In particular in so far as concerns opulence, the<lb/>propensity <del>to make choice give their h</del> <add>on those occasions in the part of those</add> on the <sic>burthen</sic><lb/>of that state to take <add>prefer</add> for their leaders those who are at<lb/>the top of it <del>will</del> <add>would</add> when sufficiently considered be <add>afford</add> of itself<lb/>a sufficient assurance against all apprehension<lb/>of a disposition on the part of the people to <add>effect any</add> subversion<lb/><del>the right</del>general or particular of the rights of property.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1820 Jan.y 22
Radicalism not dangerous
+
III Experience
II Ireland
§. leaders</note>
or 1
Position 1. Leaders
aristocratic disproves,
not ascendency democratic:
this being proved
above.
(1)
Position
The fact, that the Volunteers universally or generally had for their
leaders, look for their commanders men in the higher and
even in the highest ranks of in life, does not prove that
the ascendency thus produced obtained was not democratic ascendency
that the Volunteers were in corresponding proposition
of such as would have votes under a system
of virtually universal suffrage. For that there it as
far as appears there is reason sufficient reason in favour of the affirmative for thinking that they ever
have just been made apparent.
or 2
2. But prove that,
affectives supposes
accordant, chance of
being direct is as
height in of
power, factitious dignity
and opulence
On the other hand what it does prove is afford an example and that
most incontestably is that it is in the nature of the
case that by the great body of the people — by the
lower orders — by the subject many the chance which on one occasion of this sort or <?del> man who all furious who
are not regarded as hostile in their affection hostile
to the supposed what is regarded as the interest and is thereby conformable consonant to
the interest of the people has of becoming the object
of their is always encreasedby the height
which his condition in life has on the joint seals
of power, factitious dignity and opulence.
>note>or 3
3. This is sufficient
assurance against<lb/fears of subversion
of property</note>
In particular in so far as concerns opulence, the
propensity to make choice give their h on those occasions in the part of those on the burthen
of that state to take prefer for their leaders those who are at
the top of it will would when sufficiently considered be afford of itself
a sufficient assurance against all apprehension
of a disposition on the part of the people to effect any subversion
the rightgeneral or particular of the rights of property.
Identifier: | JB/137/434/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1820-01-22 |
or 1 - or 3 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
434 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
47151 |
|||