JB/137/136/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/136/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1820 Jan 5.</p>
 
<head>Radicalism not dangerous</head>


<note>II Nature
Five Stages</note><lb/>


<del>That in other shapes it should ever have been the</del><lb/>
<add>That by the persons in question</add> any such design should ever have been harboured on that of<lb/>
<del>subverting</del> <add>endeavouring at the subversion of</add> the rights of property in other shapes has, it is hoped<lb/>
been sufficiently proved to be impossible.  That, by <del><gap/></del> those<lb/>
same persons, in a number more or less considerable, the<lb/>
design <add>may have been harboured</add> of <unclear>indeadouring</unclear> at "the subversion of the rights of<lb/>
"property" in this particular shape, seems <del>not</del><add>neither </add> impossible<lb/>
nor improbable. But, against a mere design, supposing<lb/>
it to have no chance of producing either the effect aimed<lb/>
at, or any bad effect in any other shape, not only would<lb/>
leave subversion of the constitution, but even reason and<lb/>
argument, be <add><del>so <gap/></del></add> <del>superfluous and useless</del>, so much words<lb/>
and paper thrown away
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:19, 7 June 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jan 5.

Radicalism not dangerous

II Nature Five Stages

That in other shapes it should ever have been the
That by the persons in question any such design should ever have been harboured on that of
subverting endeavouring at the subversion of the rights of property in other shapes has, it is hoped
been sufficiently proved to be impossible. That, by those
same persons, in a number more or less considerable, the
design may have been harboured of indeadouring at "the subversion of the rights of
"property" in this particular shape, seems notneither impossible
nor improbable. But, against a mere design, supposing
it to have no chance of producing either the effect aimed
at, or any bad effect in any other shape, not only would
leave subversion of the constitution, but even reason and
argument, be so superfluous and useless, so much words
and paper thrown away


Identifier: | JB/137/136/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

136

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1816

Notes public

ID Number

46853

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in