JB/063/004/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/063/004/003: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>Miscell</head>
<head>Miscell</head>


<p>people, who by virtue of this  privilege have the power <note>Why no Laws against<lb/>
<note>Why no Laws against<lb/>
Heresy</note><lb/>
Heresy</note>
 
<p>people, who by virtue of this privilege have the power
<add>in</add> so far as it extends of setting him in enmity<lb/>
<add>in</add> so far as it extends of setting him in enmity<lb/>
and rebellion against any who are his sovereigns.<lb/>
and rebellion against any who are his sovereigns.<lb/>
Line 18: Line 20:
of green cheese.</p>
of green cheese.</p>


<p>To prevent the mischief that might result from <note>23<lb/>
<note>23<lb/>
Procedure<lb/>
Procedure<lb/>
Examination when<lb/>
Examination when<lb/>
to be Secret</note><lb/>
to be Secret</note>
 
<p>To prevent the mischief that might result from <lb/>
an <add>innocent</add> culprit's being obliged to disclose family secrets in<lb/>
an <add>innocent</add> culprit's being obliged to disclose family secrets in<lb/>
the course of his examination, suppose upon his own<lb/>
the course of his examination, suppose upon his own<lb/>
application he were at liberty to have the audience room<lb/>
application he were at liberty to have the audience room<lb/>
cleared? But then should there not be two Judges, to be a<lb/>
cleared? But then should there not be two Judges, to be a<lb/>
check upon one another, least <del>the</del> if there be one only the criminal<lb/>
check upon one another, least <del>the</del> if there be one only the criminal<lb/>
should bribe him?</p>
should bribe him?</p>


<p>If the compulsory examination of the accused <note>24<lb/>
<note>24<lb/>
Examination of <lb/>
Examination of <lb/>
the culprit whether<lb/>
the culprit whether<lb/>
to extend to all offences</note><lb/>
to extend to all offences</note>
 
<p>If the compulsory examination of the accused <lb/>
would be too much to extend to all offences, Qu, whether<lb/>
would be too much to extend to all offences, Qu, whether<lb/>
it might not be not extended to Theft, I extended<lb/>
it might not be not extended to Theft, I extended<lb/>
Line 42: Line 48:
Heresy.</p>
Heresy.</p>


&#x2014;<lb/>
<note>Procedure<lb/>
Apology for Checks<lb/>
&amp; on Judges</note>


<p>In the <add>choice of</add> precautions <del>I take</del> <add>against private interest in Judges &amp;c</add> I endeavour to find out <note>Procedure<lb/>
<p>In the <add>choice of</add> precautions <del>I take</del> <add>against private interest in Judges &amp;c</add> I endeavour to find out <lb/>
Apology for Checks<lb/>
&amp; on Judges</note><lb/>
such as would do against the worst of men: if they do<lb/>
such as would do against the worst of men: if they do<lb/>
against thes<lb/>e, a priori not they against those that <add>the best</add><lb/>
against thes<lb/>e, <foreign>a priori</foreign> not they against those that <add>the best</add><lb/>
are best.</p>
are best.</p>


Line 61: Line 67:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:43, 9 June 2020

Click Here To Edit

C

Miscell

Why no Laws against
Heresy

people, who by virtue of this privilege have the power in so far as it extends of setting him in enmity
and rebellion against any who are his sovereigns.
For that it right and as such enjoined by
God to rise up against and expell anyone's sovereign
that ever existed is a proposition much less which
let it be applied to what sovereign it will that
ever yet existed, is much less obviously repugnant
to reason than that the moon is constituted
of green cheese.

23
Procedure
Examination when
to be Secret

To prevent the mischief that might result from
an innocent culprit's being obliged to disclose family secrets in
the course of his examination, suppose upon his own
application he were at liberty to have the audience room
cleared? But then should there not be two Judges, to be a
check upon one another, least the if there be one only the criminal
should bribe him?

24
Examination of
the culprit whether
to extend to all offences

If the compulsory examination of the accused
would be too much to extend to all offences, Qu, whether
it might not be not extended to Theft, I extended
only to Robbery, Burglary Murder &

Make a list of offences to which it ought not to
be extended — It certainly ought not to abuse of the
venereal appetite not to Adultery, Fornication, Buggery &
Heresy.

Procedure
Apology for Checks
& on Judges

In the choice of precautions I take against private interest in Judges &c I endeavour to find out
such as would do against the worst of men: if they do
against thes
e, a priori not they against those that the best
are best.

The basis of all Jurisprudence is suspicion.
I never trust any thing to any man [Judge] but when
the case appears to be such that any further check that would
be applied would do more harm than good.

Secrecy (without the consent of the parties) is the inlet to partiality Secresy is the basis of Justice.




Identifier: | JB/063/004/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

17-28

Box

063

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

004

Info in main headings field

miscell.

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20193

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in