★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/056/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/071/056/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>C</head><lb/> <head>Of Falsehoods in general</head><note><head>Diff</head> Resemblence between the several modes of falsehood</note><lb/> <add>It is obvious enough that</add> Offences by falsehood <del>must</del> will in many respects<lb/><add>admit of</add> <del><gap/></del> a joint consideration. Theyare all but so<lb/> many different ways of effecting the same purpose,<lb/> that of putting a deceit upon some person or other<lb/>and causing him to take some fact for true <add>and real</add> which <note>to p. 19</note><pb/> <p>The <add>only</add> distinction between forgery and simple<lb/> falsehood turns upon <add>two principles in the first placed upon</add> the grand distinction that<lb/> later places between those phenomina that <del>act as</del><lb/>serve as signs for <add>the</add> communication of ideas, that<lb/> to act according to which they are diminished <unclear>either<lb/>consistent a</unclear> judgement:<note>in the next place upon the nature of the fact <del><gap/></del>: which will in the first instance is <del><gap/></del>. <del><gap/></del> This aspect in simple falsehood may be any fact whatsoever: in forgery it can only be a fact respecting the <unclear>formalilty</unclear> of a certain individual: viz: the fact that the person could wrote of executed the instrument in question was such or such a person</note> The distinction between<lb/> simple faslehood <del>and forgery</del> on the one hand<lb/> and perjury on the other turns <add>merely</add> upon the circumstance<lb/> of the <unclear><gap/></unclear> which by appointment<lb/> of law is made to accompany the averment in the<lb/> latter case and no in the other.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
C
Of Falsehoods in generalDiff Resemblence between the several modes of falsehood
It is obvious enough that Offences by falsehood must will in many respects
admit of a joint consideration. Theyare all but so
many different ways of effecting the same purpose,
that of putting a deceit upon some person or other
and causing him to take some fact for true and real which to p. 19
---page break---
The only distinction between forgery and simple
falsehood turns upon two principles in the first placed upon the grand distinction that
later places between those phenomina that act as
serve as signs for the communication of ideas, that
to act according to which they are diminished either
consistent a judgement:in the next place upon the nature of the fact : which will in the first instance is . This aspect in simple falsehood may be any fact whatsoever: in forgery it can only be a fact respecting the formalilty of a certain individual: viz: the fact that the person could wrote of executed the instrument in question was such or such a person The distinction between
simple faslehood and forgery on the one hand
and perjury on the other turns merely upon the circumstance
of the which by appointment
of law is made to accompany the averment in the
latter case and no in the other.
Identifier: | JB/071/056/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
not numbered |
|||
071 |
penal code |
||
056 |
of falshoods in general |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
alexander mavrokordatos |
|||
23459 |
|||