JB/137/199/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/199/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 25<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note><sic>Ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>2 <note>&sect;.4. Golden age terminated</note></p> <p><note>5<lb/>That security for<lb/>parliamentary emancipation<lb/>was equally<lb/>such for commercial<lb/><sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic>  <del><gap/> In keeping<lb/>out the <del><gap/></del> recurrence<lb/>of commercial servitude<lb/>interests of Irish aristocracy<lb/>and Irish<lb/>people  concurrent.</note></p> <p><del>And with</del> By the independency thus given to its own legislature <add>Parliament</add><lb/>a security not much inferior had thereby at the<lb/>same time been given for the perpetuation <add>to the democratic interest</add> of that relief<lb/>which consisted in the removal <del>of the restraints in pr</del><lb/>of such of the restraints on trade and industry as had<lb/>had for their object the <add>exclusive</add> benefit of the domineering nature:<lb/>for there could be little <add>scarcely could there remain any</add> ground for the apprehension that<lb/>the aristocracy would ever concur in the restoration of<lb/>any part of that oppression <add>in which/by means of</add> by which <add>even in respect of</add> their individual<lb/>interests even individually taken <add>they</add> could not but be more<lb/>or less but have been <add>be</add> in a more <add>greater</add> or less degree fellow<lb/>sufferers in common with the body of the people.</p> <p><note>6<lb/>These points excepted<lb/>the people were more<lb/>likely to be sufferers<lb/>from the change than<lb/>gainers.</note></p> <p><note>1 As to Catholic emancipation.<lb/>To the Protestants, the<lb/>Catholics, therein their<lb/>number, saw the<lb/>power of their nearest<lb/>oppressors <sic>encreased</sic><lb/>by the change.</note></p> <p>But with these exceptions, as to all other points, <del>the</del><lb/>so it appeared to many of the most discerning eyes in the<lb/>Irish nation, instead of being <add>so far from/receiving</add> gainers <add>benefitted the interest of gainers</add> the <del>b</del> great body<lb/>of the people was <add>seemed</add> more likely to sustain injury to the<lb/><add>interest of the</add> great body of the people injury <del><gap/></del> rather than benefit seemed <add>was</add><lb/>the more natural and probable results of the change.<lb/>Setting aside as above the article of trade <add>to at least</add> three fourths of the<lb/>nation the change <add>revolution great as it was</add> <del>was</del> afforded no better promise <add>promise of no better change</add> than the <note><del>In I</del></note><lb/>proverbial one from the frying pan into the fire.  If <add>by</add> the British<lb/>nation taken in the aggregate oppression had been exercised over<lb/>the Irish nation <add>taken</add> in the aggregate, in Ireland another system<lb/>of oppression &#x2014; and that a much more grinding <add>effective/add> and<lb/>galling <add>merciless/<gap/></add> on hand had been exercised by the Protestant part of<lb/>the community over the Catholic:  Where the alternative <add>Suppose the choice to be</add><lb/>lies between oppressor and opposer <add>opposition and oppression/add>, oppression at the hand<lb/>of a <del>present</del> oppressor who is ever in sight <add>and as it were in contact</add> is on <del>sv</del> several accounts<lb/>more affective than at the hands of an oppression at a distance.</p> <p><note> [.] Pain being <del>ev</del> in the<lb/>two cases equal</note></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 15:23, 27 June 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Feb. 25
Radicalism not dangerous

Ulto
III Experience
II Ireland

2 §.4. Golden age terminated

5
That security for
parliamentary emancipation
was equally
such for commercial
do In keeping
out the
recurrence
of commercial servitude
interests of Irish aristocracy
and Irish
people concurrent.

And with By the independency thus given to its own legislature Parliament
a security not much inferior had thereby at the
same time been given for the perpetuation to the democratic interest of that relief
which consisted in the removal of the restraints in pr
of such of the restraints on trade and industry as had
had for their object the exclusive benefit of the domineering nature:
for there could be little scarcely could there remain any ground for the apprehension that
the aristocracy would ever concur in the restoration of
any part of that oppression in which/by means of by which even in respect of their individual
interests even individually taken they could not but be more
or less but have been be in a more greater or less degree fellow
sufferers in common with the body of the people.

6
These points excepted
the people were more
likely to be sufferers
from the change than
gainers.

1 As to Catholic emancipation.
To the Protestants, the
Catholics, therein their
number, saw the
power of their nearest
oppressors encreased
by the change.

But with these exceptions, as to all other points, the
so it appeared to many of the most discerning eyes in the
Irish nation, instead of being so far from/receiving gainers benefitted the interest of gainers the b great body
of the people was seemed more likely to sustain injury to the
interest of the great body of the people injury rather than benefit seemed was
the more natural and probable results of the change.
Setting aside as above the article of trade to at least three fourths of the
nation the change revolution great as it was was afforded no better promise promise of no better change than the In I
proverbial one from the frying pan into the fire. If by the British
nation taken in the aggregate oppression had been exercised over
the Irish nation taken in the aggregate, in Ireland another system
of oppression — and that a much more grinding effective/add> and
galling <add>merciless/
on hand had been exercised by the Protestant part of
the community over the Catholic: Where the alternative Suppose the choice to be
lies between oppressor and opposer opposition and oppression/add>, oppression at the hand
of a present oppressor who is ever in sight <add>and as it were in contact
is on sv several accounts
more affective than at the hands of an oppression at a distance.

[.] Pain being ev in the
two cases equal




Identifier: | JB/137/199/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-02-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-6

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

199

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

46916

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in