JB/087/020/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/087/020/004: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
<add>matter</add> it is not in the power of punishment to make <add>cause</add><lb/>him <add>really to</add> alter it is a proposition than which nothing<lb/>can be more incontestible <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <!-- Footnote (a) begins at the bottom of this page -->  It would rather confirm him in it: partly by the <gap/> <gap/> <add>of the want of reasons</add> which <gap/><lb/>so applied comes with it of the wantof reasons;<lb/>and partly by the aversion which it creates toward<lb/>that <add>the arguments of any which militate on that one</add> side of the question which it <del>the</del> supports:<lb/>The only point then which it is possible for punishment<lb/>when thus applied to compass, and indeed<lb/><add>in point of fact</add> the only point to the compassing of which punishment<lb/>has ever been applied is the obliging <add>causing</add> a man<lb/>to say <add><hi rend="underline">declare</hi></add> that he believes the proposition in question.<lb/>
<add>matter</add> it is not in the power of punishment to make <add>cause</add><lb/>him <add>really to</add> alter it is a proposition than which nothing<lb/>can be more incontestible <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <!-- Footnote (a) begins at the bottom of this page -->  It would rather confirm him in it: partly by the <gap/> <gap/> <add>of the want of reasons</add> which <gap/><lb/>so applied comes with it of the wantof reasons;<lb/>and partly by the aversion which it creates toward<lb/>that <add>the arguments of any which militate on that one</add> side of the question which it <del>the</del> supports:<lb/>The only point then which it is possible for punishment<lb/>when thus applied to compass, and indeed<lb/><add>in point of fact</add> the only point to the compassing of which punishment<lb/>has ever been applied is the obliging <add>causing</add> a man<lb/>to say <add><hi rend="underline">declare</hi></add> that he believes the proposition in question.<lb/>


<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> NOTE<lb/>
<head>6</head>
 
<note>6 <lb/>Evils resulting from <lb/>such falsehood are <lb/>1.  the pain of ignominy.  <lb/>2. the <gap/> <lb/>of the fine <lb/>of the moral sanction</note>
This being the case either he refuses to make<lb/>the declaration that is required of him, or he de-<lb/><note>-clares</note>
 
<!-- Horizontal line separating the text from the footnote (a) -->
 
<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <head>NOTE</head><lb/>
<note>That fear of power can not <lb/>directly influence <lb/>belief</note> If any one should <del>be</del> <add>feel himself</add> disposed to <del>dispute</del> <add>doubt of</add> this, I would<lb/> propose to him the following experiment; if such it<lb/>may be called, where the facts in question <add>exemplified</add> are in<lb/>the very essence of them hypothetical.  <del>Let  him</del> <add>Go</add><lb/>into any room in which there is one <add>and but one</add> table:  that<lb/> is what to <del>him</del> <add>you</add> after having examined it appears<lb/>to be one and but one table.  Now <del>let him</del> <add><del>there</del></add> consider<lb/>whether if a man stronger than  <del>himself</del> <add>you</add> were<lb/>to come and threaten <del>him</del> <add>you</add> that unless <del>he</del> <add>you</add> believed<lb/><lb/>that in that room instead of one table there were<lb/>four <add>three</add> <del>he</del> <add>you</add> should be soundly beaten, it would <add>could</add> be possible <lb/>for <del>that man</del> <add><del>you</del> that man</add> by all the beating he could give you to<lb/>cause you really to believe that in that room there were<lb/>really four tables.  Or to come to a test which belongs more<lb/> <!-- This footnote (a) continues on page 087/021/001 -->  
<note>That fear of power can not <lb/>directly influence <lb/>belief</note> If any one should <del>be</del> <add>feel himself</add> disposed to <del>dispute</del> <add>doubt of</add> this, I would<lb/> propose to him the following experiment; if such it<lb/>may be called, where the facts in question <add>exemplified</add> are in<lb/>the very essence of them hypothetical.  <del>Let  him</del> <add>Go</add><lb/>into any room in which there is one <add>and but one</add> table:  that<lb/> is what to <del>him</del> <add>you</add> after having examined it appears<lb/>to be one and but one table.  Now <del>let him</del> <add><del>there</del></add> consider<lb/>whether if a man stronger than  <del>himself</del> <add>you</add> were<lb/>to come and threaten <del>him</del> <add>you</add> that unless <del>he</del> <add>you</add> believed<lb/><lb/>that in that room instead of one table there were<lb/>four <add>three</add> <del>he</del> <add>you</add> should be soundly beaten, it would <add>could</add> be possible <lb/>for <del>that man</del> <add><del>you</del> that man</add> by all the beating he could give you to<lb/>cause you really to believe that in that room there were<lb/>really four tables.  Or to come to a test which belongs more<lb/> <!-- This footnote (a) continues on page 087/021/001 -->  



Revision as of 22:31, 28 June 2020

Click Here To Edit

4

[Indirect Legislation]


Religion

where the persuasion
is already adopted

matter it is not in the power of punishment to make cause
him really to alter it is a proposition than which nothing
can be more incontestible (a) It would rather confirm him in it: partly by the of the want of reasons which
so applied comes with it of the wantof reasons;
and partly by the aversion which it creates toward
that the arguments of any which militate on that one side of the question which it the supports:
The only point then which it is possible for punishment
when thus applied to compass, and indeed
in point of fact the only point to the compassing of which punishment
has ever been applied is the obliging causing a man
to say declare that he believes the proposition in question.

6

6
Evils resulting from
such falsehood are
1. the pain of ignominy.
2. the
of the fine
of the moral sanction

This being the case either he refuses to make
the declaration that is required of him, or he de-
-clares


(a) NOTE
That fear of power can not
directly influence
belief
If any one should be feel himself disposed to dispute doubt of this, I would
propose to him the following experiment; if such it
may be called, where the facts in question exemplified are in
the very essence of them hypothetical. Let him Go
into any room in which there is one and but one table: that
is what to him you after having examined it appears
to be one and but one table. Now let him there consider
whether if a man stronger than himself you were
to come and threaten him you that unless he you believed

that in that room instead of one table there were
four three he you should be soundly beaten, it would could be possible
for that man you that man by all the beating he could give you to
cause you really to believe that in that room there were
really four tables. Or to come to a test which belongs more


















Identifier: | JB/087/020/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-6

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

020

Info in main headings field

indirect legislation

Image

004

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

c. hamilton

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27545

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in