JB/137/210/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:19, 2 July 2020

1819 Dec. 16
Radicalism not dangerous

3
Conclusion
1

4 or 1
Design changed —
not destruction but
subversion. Design
impossible, if believed
what wisdom! if not,
what honesty!

[Meantime] let not the substance substantial import of the charge brought
against us by the destroyers of our labours by the subvertors
of our rights be out of mind. Of The object we are
charged with aiming at is the description to this purpose at least
praise enough: it is the subversion of the rights of property
the subversion not the destruction: the subversion
by means of a new partition: for without aiming at destruction
which as above is impossible no other mode of subversion is there that can be
aimed at. But we have seen how impossible it is that
any plans for a new partition of the property should be
framed and acted upon. Yet this is the plan which
the Prince Regent has been made to say has been framed
and acted upon. They The men who put the speech into his
mouth what What they then put into his mouth speech they
the men who put it there did they themselves believe
it to be true, or did they not? if they did, think of
their wisdom ? discernment! if they did, think of their honesty!

Identifier: \| JB/137/210/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.
Date_1	1819-12-16	Marginal Summary Numbering	4 or 1
Box	137	Main Headings	radicalism not dangerous
Folio number	210	Info in main headings field	radicalism not dangerous
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / d3 / e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	46927
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>1819 <sic>Dec.</sic> 16<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>3<lb/><note>Conclusion</note><lb/>1</p> <p><note>4 or 1<lb/>Design changed &#x2014;<lb/>not destruction but<lb/>subversion.   Design<lb/>impossible, if believed<lb/>what wisdom! if not,<lb/>what honesty!</note></p> <p><!-- brackets in pencil --> [Meantime] let not the substance <add>substantial import</add> of the charge brought<lb/>against us by the destroyers of our labours by the <sic>subvertors</sic><lb/>of our rights be out of mind. <add>Of</add> The object we are<lb/>charged with aiming at is <add>the description</add> to this purpose at least<lb/>praise enough: it is the subversion of the rights of property<lb/>the subversion not the destruction: the subversion<lb/>by means of a new partition: for without <add>aiming at</add> destruction<lb/><add>which as above is impossible</add> no other mode of subversion is there that can be<lb/>aimed at.   But we have seen how impossible it is that<lb/>any plans for a new partition of <del>the</del> property should be<lb/>framed and acted upon.   Yet this is the plan which<lb/>the Prince Regent has been made to say has been framed<lb/>and acted upon.   <del>They <add>The men</add> who put the speech into his<lb/>mouth what</del> what they then put into his mouth <add>speech</add> <del>they</del><lb/>the men who put it there did they themselves believe<lb/>it to be true, or did they not?  if they did, think of<lb/>their wisdom <del>?</del> <add>discernment</add>! if they did, think of their honesty!</p>
+<head>1819 <sic>Dec.</sic> 16<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>3<lb/><note>Conclusion</note><lb/>1</p> <p><note>4 or 1<lb/>Design changed &#x2014;<lb/>not destruction but<lb/>subversion.   Design<lb/>impossible, if believed<lb/>what wisdom! if not,<lb/>what honesty!</note></p> <p><!-- brackets in pencil --> [Meantime] let not the substance <add>substantial import</add> of the charge brought<lb/>against us by the destroyers of our labours by the <sic>subvertors</sic><lb/>of our rights be out of mind. <add>Of</add> The object we are<lb/>charged with aiming at is <add>the description</add> to this purpose at least<lb/>praise enough: it is the subversion of the rights of property<lb/>the subversion not the destruction: the subversion<lb/>by means of a new partition: for without <add>aiming at</add> destruction<lb/><add>which as above is impossible</add> no other mode of subversion is there that can be<lb/>aimed at.   But we have seen how impossible it is that<lb/>any plans for a new partition of <del>the</del> property should be<lb/>framed and acted upon.   Yet this is the plan which<lb/>the Prince Regent has been made to say has been framed<lb/>and acted upon.   <del>They <add>The men</add> who put the speech into his<lb/>mouth what</del> What they then put into his mouth <add>speech</add> <del>they</del><lb/>the men who put it there did they themselves believe<lb/>it to be true, or did they not?  if they did, think of<lb/>their wisdom <del>?</del> <add>discernment</add>! if they did, think of their honesty!</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/137/210/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:19, 2 July 2020

Navigation

Search