JB/087/020/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/020/003: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


<p>
<p>
This then is the great and only article of religious faith, <del>which for</del> <add>to consider nothing more than</add> the mere temporal purpose<lb/>of political society, <del>it is the interest and the duty<lb/>of the legislator to <gap/></del> the prevalence <add>adoption</add> of which<lb/>can be of any <del>use</del> <add>use</add> assistance to the legislator:<lb/>any others can at best but be indifferent, and<lb/><del>very probably</del> are very liable to be pernicious.<lb/>But any such article mischievous or not mischievous<lb/>in itself <del>becomes</del> is sure to be of mischievous<lb/>tendency as long as any coercive motives or indeed<lb/>any motives at all are set at work <add><sic>employ'd</sic></add> by<lb/>the legislator to favour its adoption . . The persons<lb/>who can be in a way to embrace it <add>by whom it can be embraced</add> <del>be</del> they who<lb/>they may <gap/> <add>at the time when the supposed law is first established</add> come under one or other of the<lb/>descriptions following:  either they are of opinion<lb/>with the article in question, or they are of opinion<lb/>against it, or they have not yet formed any opinion<lb/>about the matter.  In the first  <add>Applied to the first</add> case<lb/>the law is [unnecessary] and on that account, just<lb/>as any other law would be, pernicious: in the<lb/>second case it is productive of a degree of co-ercion<lb/>which by the supposition is useless, and as all<lb/>co-ercion is in itself <add>an</add> evil, on that account pernicious.</p>  
This then is the great and only article of religious faith, <del>which for</del> <add>to consider nothing more than</add> the mere temporal purpose<lb/>of political society, <del>it is the interest and the duty<lb/>of the legislator to inculcate</del> the prevalence <add>adoption</add> of which<lb/>can be of any <del>use</del> <add>use</add> assistance to the legislator:<lb/>any others can at best but be indifferent, and<lb/><del>very probably</del> are very liable to be pernicious.<lb/>But any such article mischievous or not mischievous<lb/>in itself <del>becomes</del> is sure to be of mischievous<lb/>tendency as long as any coercive motives or indeed<lb/>any motives at all are set at work <add><sic>employ'd</sic></add> by<lb/>the legislator to favour its adoption . . The persons<lb/>who can be in a way to embrace it <add>by whom it can be embraced</add> <del>be</del> they who<lb/>they may <gap/> <add>at the time when the supposed law is first established</add> come under one or other of the<lb/>descriptions following:  either they are of opinion<lb/>with the article in question, or they are of opinion<lb/>against it, or they have not yet formed any opinion<lb/>about the matter.  In the first  <add>Applied to the first</add> case<lb/>the law is [unnecessary] and on that account, just<lb/>as any other law would be, pernicious: in the<lb/>second case it is productive of a degree of co-ercion<lb/>which by the supposition is useless, and as all<lb/>co-ercion is in itself <add>an</add> evil, on that account pernicious.</p>  


<head>5</head>
<head>5</head>

Revision as of 18:27, 2 July 2020

Click Here To Edit

[Indirect Legislation]

Religion


4

Mischief of upholding applying
the penal force of
this Sanction by penal methods , to
points of political
indifference

Agenda and entendu — that is when
utility is out of the
question — if some
sort of folly
to be practiced
or some absurdity to
be swallowd

1. by introducing
the evil of punishment if applied
to agenda.

This then is the great and only article of religious faith, which for to consider nothing more than the mere temporal purpose
of political society, it is the interest and the duty
of the legislator to inculcate
the prevalence adoption of which
can be of any use use assistance to the legislator:
any others can at best but be indifferent, and
very probably are very liable to be pernicious.
But any such article mischievous or not mischievous
in itself becomes is sure to be of mischievous
tendency as long as any coercive motives or indeed
any motives at all are set at work employ'd by
the legislator to favour its adoption . . The persons
who can be in a way to embrace it by whom it can be embraced be they who
they may at the time when the supposed law is first established come under one or other of the
descriptions following: either they are of opinion
with the article in question, or they are of opinion
against it, or they have not yet formed any opinion
about the matter. In the first Applied to the first case
the law is [unnecessary] and on that account, just
as any other law would be, pernicious: in the
second case it is productive of a degree of co-ercion
which by the supposition is useless, and as all
co-ercion is in itself an evil, on that account pernicious.

5

5
2. by implanting
falsehood if applied
to credenda — where
the belief is already adopted


But this is not all the mischief. That when
a man has once formed an opinion right or wrong about any
matter

---page break---


















Identifier: | JB/087/020/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-6

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

020

Info in main headings field

indirect legislation

Image

003

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

c. hamilton

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27545

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in