JB/147/064/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/064/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
they please.</p>
they please.</p>


True: <add>but by custom, no: under the<add>sort of</add></add><add>occasion</add> <del>but</del> to this purpose<lb/>
<p>True: <add>but by custom, no: under the<add>sort of</add></add><add>occasion</add> <del>but</del> to this purpose<lb/>
here in question, it is not by <hi rend="underline">law</hi> but by <hi rend="underline">custom</hi> <lb/>
here in question, it is not by <hi rend="underline">law</hi> but by <hi rend="underline">custom</hi> <lb/>
that conduct is determined.  <del>In parliamentary</del><lb/>
that conduct is determined.  <del>In parliamentary</del><lb/>
political matters in either House of parliament <lb/>
should the granter or his parliamentary relative <lb/>
be guilty of any such offence as that of speaking <lb/>
or voting according to his conscience were ended<lb/>
the successor will not be bound by custom any <lb/>
more than by law: he will then <add>be by such offence set free and</add> <gap/> <del>not less f<gap/> be</del><lb/>
<add>enlisted to revolve the grant.</add><del>use his pleasures and have <add><gap/></add> out the offender than the</del><lb/>
<del>author of the grant <gap/></del>.  But should the granter
maintain toward his successor by same habit of <lb/>
<add><unclear>convergency</unclear></add>unvaried obsequiousness as toward the original<lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:45, 7 July 2020

Click Here To Edit

Well but (says somebody at any rate have
not have the dilapidation: for the grant being determinable
at pleasure, the successors were successor is not bound but
may, any of them put an end to the grant when
they please.

True: but by custom, no: under the<add>sort of</add>occasion but to this purpose
here in question, it is not by law but by custom
that conduct is determined. In parliamentary
political matters in either House of parliament
should the granter or his parliamentary relative
be guilty of any such offence as that of speaking
or voting according to his conscience were ended
the successor will not be bound by custom any
more than by law: he will then be by such offence set free and not less f be
enlisted to revolve the grant.use his pleasures and have out the offender than the
author of the grant . But should the granter maintain toward his successor by same habit of
convergencyunvaried obsequiousness as toward the original

Identifier: | JB/147/064/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

3-5

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

064

Info in main headings field

Sinecures &c

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E2

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

49289

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in