★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/137/183/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- heading and marginal notes in pencil --> <head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 24<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p><note><sic>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>7 <note>§.6. Coincidence<lb/>4. <sic>Annuality</sic></note | <!-- heading and marginal notes in pencil --> <head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 24<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p><note><sic>ult<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>7 <note>§.6. Coincidence<lb/>4. <sic>Annuality</sic></note></p> <p><note>14<lb/>Result as to subversion<lb/>of property &c<lb/>actual none in either<lb/>case: under <sic>parl.</sic><lb/>reform, danger still<lb/>less than under democratic<lb/>ascendency,<lb/>as established by<lb/>Irish association.</note></p> <p>With regard to subversion of property disturbance in every<lb/>imaginable shape — what is the consequence? That under<lb/>democratic ascendency as mentioned <add>in the case in question</add> by the free association<lb/>system, how so ever small <add>so ever was</add> the danger of evil in any such<lb/>shape — <del>I say</del> (the <hi rend="underline">danger</hi> it must be said — since<lb/>actual evil in that or any other shape there was none)<lb/>under democratic ascendency as it would <del>be established</del><lb/>then have been established and would at any time be established<lb/>by radical parliamentary reform, the danger<lb/>if any, would have been and would be still less.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
1820 Feb. 24
Radicalism not dangerous
ulto
III Experience
II Ireland
7 §.6. Coincidence
4. Annuality
14
Result as to subversion
of property &c
actual none in either
case: under parl.
reform, danger still
less than under democratic
ascendency,
as established by
Irish association.
With regard to subversion of property disturbance in every
imaginable shape — what is the consequence? That under
democratic ascendency as mentioned in the case in question by the free association
system, how so ever small so ever was the danger of evil in any such
shape — I say (the danger it must be said — since
actual evil in that or any other shape there was none)
under democratic ascendency as it would be established
then have been established and would at any time be established
by radical parliamentary reform, the danger
if any, would have been and would be still less.
|
Identifier: | JB/137/183/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-02-24 |
14 |
||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
183 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]] |
||
|
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
|
1818 |
|||
|
46900 |
|||
