★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Indirect Legislation</head> | |||
<note>Political</note> | |||
<head>11</head> | |||
<note>Limits to the<lb/>application of it<lb/><del>Advantages<lb/>resulting from<lb/>the use of the<lb/>above expedients<lb/>Not wanted in<lb/>offences which<lb/><sic>admitt</sic> of no<lb/>concealment</del></note> | |||
Let us now observe the particular uses that<lb/>may be made of the expedients above suggested:<lb/>and the manner in which <add>the</add> various<lb/>modifications of which delinquency is susceptible<lb/>It is obvious enough that there is one case in<lb/>which they ar of no use, because the <del>bus</del> end<lb/>may be attained as well without them: this is<lb/><del>whether what</del> where the offence is such that<lb/>the offender and the fact must in the nature<lb/>of things be <add>sufficiently</add> notorious, and where <add>at the same time</add> the punishment<lb/><del>is such</del> and responsibility of the offender are<lb/>such [that he can not but at all times be<lb/>amenable.] as to render it certain <del>that</del> either that<lb/>it will not be his inclination or that it will not<lb/>be in his power to elude it. Such is the case<lb/>for instance <del>with</del> <add>where the delinquent is a</add> person<del>s</del> who stand<add>s</add> invested with <lb/><del>public trusts</del> <add><del>judicial</del> an office<del>rs</del> of a judicial nature</add> considerable either in point of profit<lb/> or of honour; and where at the same time<lb/>where the offence consists of some neglect of<lb/>duty <add>for instance</add> or <del><gap/></del> abuse of powe, but of such a<lb/>nature that no degree of punishment can be<lb/>required <del>The</del> beyond what would be inflicted by<lb/>the forfeiture of the office. But these are cases <lb/><note>which</note><lb/><lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
Indirect Legislation
Political
11
Limits to the
application of it
Advantages
resulting from
the use of the
above expedients
Not wanted in
offences which
admitt of no
concealment
Let us now observe the particular uses that
may be made of the expedients above suggested:
and the manner in which the various
modifications of which delinquency is susceptible
It is obvious enough that there is one case in
which they ar of no use, because the bus end
may be attained as well without them: this is
whether what where the offence is such that
the offender and the fact must in the nature
of things be sufficiently notorious, and where at the same time the punishment
is such and responsibility of the offender are
such [that he can not but at all times be
amenable.] as to render it certain that either that
it will not be his inclination or that it will not
be in his power to elude it. Such is the case
for instance with where the delinquent is a persons who stands invested with
public trusts judicial an officers of a judicial nature considerable either in point of profit
or of honour; and where at the same time
where the offence consists of some neglect of
duty for instance or abuse of powe, but of such a
nature that no degree of punishment can be
required The beyond what would be inflicted by
the forfeiture of the office. But these are cases
which
|
Identifier: | JB/087/032/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
10-12 |
|||
|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
032 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f13 / f14 / f15 / f16 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
c. hamilton |
|||
|
27557 |
|||
