JB/137/460/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/460/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1819 June 23 +<lb/><foreign>Collectanea.</foreign> <sic>Parl</sic> Reform.  Grattan against Universal Suffrage</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>p10 Peoples last court</note><lb/>To Erskine 1 <note>Grattan observed<lb/>Universality <sic>undangerous</sic></note></p> <p>+ N.B. What Plowden says about reform in this and many following pages<lb/>is highly instructive| "Hardy 276" In August <add>1783</add> that is those matters before the meeting <!-- continues into margin -->  of the convention <del>at</del> <add>in</add> Dublin, the<lb/>"Parliament was <gap/>, <del>a</del><lb/>"a new one summoned to<lb/>"meets"<lb/>Pl.p. 451. 452.</p> <p>In Plowdens History of Ireland II. 455 <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> &#x2014;from <add>14</add> <sic>Parl. Deb.</sic> p.80</p> <p>&#9758; This must have been the collection of Irish <sic>Parl.<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> Debates.</p> <p>This was in the debate on Mr W. Brabazon Ponsonby's Bill "for amending<lb/>"and improving the state of the representation in Parliament presented in <!-- continues in margin --> 1794  Presented in<lb/>Plowdens Appendix <sic>Vol</sic><lb/>III <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> XCVII.<lb/><del>before</del> on <del>the 2 August</del> <add> motion for rejecting</add><lb/><del>numbers for it</del><lb/>it by a postponement<lb/> <sic>till</sic> 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> August, numbers<lb/> for the postponement 142<lb/>against 44 "Thus<lb/>ended the cause of parliamentary<lb/>reform</p> <!-- part of following marginal note overwritten --> <p><note><gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/>57<lb/>Grattan <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>1. It completely diverts<lb/>from the fundamentals<lb/>of the British Constitution</note></p> <p><note>2<lb/>2 It violates the rights of<lb/>man: viz. by involving<lb/>the destruction of property</note></p> <p>"Worse even than the abuses so defended is a plan I have<lb/>"seen for their reformation &#x2014; personal or individual representation.</p> <p>"The principle of such a plan is a complete avowed,<lb/>"and unqualified departure from the <hi rend="underline">vital and fundamental</hi><lb/>"<hi rend="underline">article of the British Constitution</hi>, in practice and in theory;<lb/>"and I must say, such an outset requires no small<lb/>"degree of mischievous and senseless temerity.  With equal<lb/>"folly does this plan violate the dearest rights of man,<lb/>"for if there be one <hi rend="underline">right of man</hi> entirely indisputable,<lb/>"it is that which <hi rend="underline">gives to the <del>I</del><add>I</add>ndividual</hi> in particular,<lb/>"and the community in general, <hi rend="underline">the fruits of</hi><lb/>"<hi rend="underline">his and their industry;</hi> thus the passenger through<lb/>"your field, or the labourer <del>through</del><add>on</add> your farm, has no<lb/>"right to make rules for the management of the same,<lb/>"nor have the aggregate of labourers or of non-proprietors<lb/>"a right to make rules or ordinances for the land,<lb/>"farms, or trade of the community. |</p> <p><note>3<lb/>N.B. On a survey<lb/>half the Irish were exempt<lb/>from hearth-money for<lb/>want of property.</note></p> <p>"This reasoning applies very strongly to the case<lb/>"of Ireland, because it appeared on the hearth money <add><del>survey of the last year that those who were to be exempt from the hearth-money</del></add> for<lb/><add>survey of the last year, that those who were to be exempt from the hearth-money, for</add> "want of property were more <del>of</del> than half of our Inhabitants.<lb/>"It was besides insisted on by the objectors to reform<lb/>"on the principle of property, that such a principle excluded<lb/>"the majority; it follows, that the plan, which gives votes<lb/>"to all the <del>I</del><add>I</add>nhabitants, and gives away to that majority the fruits<lb/>"of the <del>I</del><add>I</add>ndustry of the community, <hi rend="underline">gives away the Estate of the<lb/>landholder</hi></p>       
<head>1819 June 23 +<lb/><foreign>Collectanea.</foreign> <sic>Parl</sic> Reform.  Grattan against Universal Suffrage</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>p10 Peoples last court</note><lb/>To Erskine 1 <note>Grattan observed<lb/>Universality <sic>undangerous</sic></note></p> <p>+ N.B. What Plowden says about reform in this and many following pages<lb/>is highly instructive| "Hardy 276" In August <add>1783</add> that is those matters before the meeting <!-- continues into margin -->  of the convention <del>at</del> <add>in</add> Dublin, the<lb/>"Parliament was dissolved, <del>a</del><lb/>"a new one summoned to<lb/>"meets"<lb/>Pl.p. 451. 452.</p> <p>In Plowdens History of Ireland II. 455 <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> &#x2014;from <add>14</add> <sic>Parl. Deb.</sic> p.80</p> <p>&#9758; This must have been the collection of Irish <sic>Parl.<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> Debates.</p> <p>This was in the debate on Mr W. Brabazon Ponsonby's Bill "for amending<lb/>"and improving the state of the representation in Parliament presented in <!-- continues in margin --> 1794  Presented in<lb/>Plowdens Appendix <sic>Vol</sic><lb/>III <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> XCVII.<lb/><del>before</del> on <del>the 2 August</del> <add> motion for rejecting</add><lb/><del>numbers for it</del><lb/>it by a postponement<lb/> <sic>till</sic> 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> August, numbers<lb/> for the postponement 142<lb/>against 44 "Thus<lb/>ended the cause of parliamentary<lb/>reform</p> <!-- part of following marginal note overwritten --> <p><note><gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/>57<lb/>Grattan <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>1. It completely diverts<lb/>from the fundamentals<lb/>of the British Constitution</note></p> <p><note>2<lb/>2 It violates the rights of<lb/>man: viz. by involving<lb/>the destruction of property</note></p> <p>"Worse even than the abuses so defended is a plan I have<lb/>"seen for their reformation &#x2014; personal or individual representation.</p> <p>"The principle of such a plan is a complete avowed,<lb/>"and unqualified departure from the <hi rend="underline">vital and fundamental</hi><lb/>"<hi rend="underline">article of the British Constitution</hi>, in practice and in theory;<lb/>"and I must say, such an outset requires no small<lb/>"degree of mischievous and senseless temerity.  With equal<lb/>"folly does this plan violate the dearest rights of man,<lb/>"for if there be one <hi rend="underline">right of man</hi> entirely indisputable,<lb/>"it is that which <hi rend="underline">gives to the <del>I</del><add>I</add>ndividual</hi> in particular,<lb/>"and the community in general, <hi rend="underline">the fruits of</hi><lb/>"<hi rend="underline">his and their industry;</hi> thus the passenger through<lb/>"your field, or the labourer <del>through</del><add>on</add> your farm, has no<lb/>"right to make rules for the management of the same,<lb/>"nor have the aggregate of labourers or of non-proprietors<lb/>"a right to make rules or ordinances for the land,<lb/>"farms, or trade of the community. |</p> <p><note>3<lb/>N.B. On a survey<lb/>half the Irish were exempt<lb/>from hearth-money for<lb/>want of property.</note></p> <p>"This reasoning applies very strongly to the case<lb/>"of Ireland, because it appeared on the hearth money <add><del>survey of the last year that those who were to be exempt from the hearth-money</del></add> for<lb/><add>survey of the last year, that those who were to be exempt from the hearth-money, for</add> "want of property were more <del>of</del> than half of our Inhabitants.<lb/>"It was besides insisted on by the objectors to reform<lb/>"on the principle of property, that such a principle excluded<lb/>"the majority; it follows, that the plan, which gives votes<lb/>"to all the <del>I</del><add>I</add>nhabitants, and gives away to that majority the fruits<lb/>"of the <del>I</del><add>I</add>ndustry of the community, <hi rend="underline">gives away the Estate of the<lb/>landholder</hi></p>       






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:41, 3 August 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 June 23 +
Collectanea. Parl Reform. Grattan against Universal Suffrage

p10 Peoples last court
To Erskine 1 Grattan observed
Universality undangerous

+ N.B. What Plowden says about reform in this and many following pages
is highly instructive| "Hardy 276" In August 1783 that is those matters before the meeting of the convention at in Dublin, the
"Parliament was dissolved, a
"a new one summoned to
"meets"
Pl.p. 451. 452.

In Plowdens History of Ireland II. 455 + —from 14 Parl. Deb. p.80

☞ This must have been the collection of Irish Parl.y Debates.

This was in the debate on Mr W. Brabazon Ponsonby's Bill "for amending
"and improving the state of the representation in Parliament presented in 1794 Presented in
Plowdens Appendix Vol
III No XCVII.
before on the 2 August motion for rejecting
numbers for it
it by a postponement
till 2d August, numbers
for the postponement 142
against 44 "Thus
ended the cause of parliamentary
reform



57
Grattan

1. It completely diverts
from the fundamentals
of the British Constitution

2
2 It violates the rights of
man: viz. by involving
the destruction of property

"Worse even than the abuses so defended is a plan I have
"seen for their reformation — personal or individual representation.

"The principle of such a plan is a complete avowed,
"and unqualified departure from the vital and fundamental
"article of the British Constitution, in practice and in theory;
"and I must say, such an outset requires no small
"degree of mischievous and senseless temerity. With equal
"folly does this plan violate the dearest rights of man,
"for if there be one right of man entirely indisputable,
"it is that which gives to the IIndividual in particular,
"and the community in general, the fruits of
"his and their industry; thus the passenger through
"your field, or the labourer throughon your farm, has no
"right to make rules for the management of the same,
"nor have the aggregate of labourers or of non-proprietors
"a right to make rules or ordinances for the land,
"farms, or trade of the community. |

3
N.B. On a survey
half the Irish were exempt
from hearth-money for
want of property.

"This reasoning applies very strongly to the case
"of Ireland, because it appeared on the hearth money survey of the last year that those who were to be exempt from the hearth-money for
survey of the last year, that those who were to be exempt from the hearth-money, for "want of property were more of than half of our Inhabitants.
"It was besides insisted on by the objectors to reform
"on the principle of property, that such a principle excluded
"the majority; it follows, that the plan, which gives votes
"to all the IInhabitants, and gives away to that majority the fruits
"of the IIndustry of the community, gives away the Estate of the
landholder




Identifier: | JB/137/460/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-06-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

460

Info in main headings field

collectanea parl. reform - grattan against universal suffrage

Image

001

Titles

to erskine

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47177

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in