★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1819 <sic>Dec</sic> 2<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>II. Experience</note><lb/>5 <note>II Ireland</note></p> <p><del>That the p</del> If there be a case <add>any cases</add> in which <del>the <gap/></del> <add>on the part of</add><lb/><add>those who have applied their minds to the subject the</add> insincerity of professions can be inferred with reason from<lb/>other parts of the discourse held by the same persons on the<lb/>same subject, it will surely be this. <add>surely this may be reckoned as one</add> Here as a <del>ques</del><lb/>position <add>question</add> on the <del><gap/></del> truth of which the propriety of the <del>conduct</del> <add><unclear>manner</unclear></add><lb/><del>pu</del> course of conduct <add>to be</add> pursued on the occasion, by the <add>can not</add> <lb/>confession of all parties turns: <add>be desired to turn</add> namely whether from<lb/>the establishment of radical reform <del><gap/></del> destruction of property<lb/>would ensue. Now <add>Of this question</add> from first to last the affirmation has<lb/>been taken for granted. On what grounds? On none<lb/>whatsoever.</p> <p>Over and over again you have it from all sections<lb/>of the ruling few — from public bodies as well as from<lb/>individuals from Whig newspapers no <add>not</add> less than from<lb/>Tory Newspapers — that <add>of</add> radical reform general destruction<lb/>of property is <!-- brackets in pencil --> [<add>not only</add> on the part of those who <del><gap/></del> advocate<lb/>it the intended, but in itself] the certain consequence.</p> <p><del>From <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> Of all these men whose | <head>1819 <sic>Dec</sic> 2<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>II. Experience</note><lb/>5 <note>II Ireland</note></p> <p><del>That the p</del> If there be a case <add>any cases</add> in which <del>the <gap/></del> <add>on the part of</add><lb/><add>those who have applied their minds to the subject the</add> insincerity of professions can be inferred with reason from<lb/>other parts of the discourse held by the same persons on the<lb/>same subject, it will surely be this. <add>surely this may be reckoned as one</add> Here as a <del>ques</del><lb/>position <add>question</add> on the <del><gap/></del> truth of which the propriety of the <del>conduct</del> <add><unclear>manner</unclear></add><lb/><del>pu</del> course of conduct <add>to be</add> pursued on the occasion, by the <add>can not</add> <lb/>confession of all parties turns: <add>be desired to turn</add> namely whether from<lb/>the establishment of radical reform <del><gap/></del> destruction of property<lb/>would ensue. Now <add>Of this question</add> from first to last the affirmation has<lb/>been taken for granted. On what grounds? On none<lb/>whatsoever.</p> <p>Over and over again you have it from all sections<lb/>of the ruling few — from public bodies as well as from<lb/>individuals from Whig newspapers no <add>not</add> less than from<lb/>Tory Newspapers — that <add>of</add> radical reform general destruction<lb/>of property is <!-- brackets in pencil --> [<add>not only</add> on the part of those who <del><gap/></del> advocate<lb/>it the intended, but in itself] the certain consequence.</p> <p><del>From <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> Of all these men whose professed<lb/>assurance on this subject is so entire, from no one has there<lb/>ever been very the slightest attempt to produce any thing<lb/>like <del>the</del> so much as the slightest ground or commencement<lb/>of a ground for any such assurance.</p> <p>The conclusion — perpetuation of the existing system<lb/>with the whole <gap/> of its continually <sic>encreasing</sic> abuses<lb/>perpetuating a system of limited government in name a ruthless <add>an <unclear>absolutely</unclear></add><lb/><add>predatory</add> despotism in effect — and thus acceded to by both parties,<lb/>on grounds <del>facts</del> in support of which they have none,<lb/>either of them been able to produce a single word — the<lb/>slightest attempt at argument.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1819 Dec 2
Radicalism not dangerous
II. Experience
5 II Ireland
That the p If there be a case any cases in which the on the part of
those who have applied their minds to the subject the insincerity of professions can be inferred with reason from
other parts of the discourse held by the same persons on the
same subject, it will surely be this. surely this may be reckoned as one Here as a ques
position question on the truth of which the propriety of the conduct manner
pu course of conduct to be pursued on the occasion, by the can not
confession of all parties turns: be desired to turn namely whether from
the establishment of radical reform destruction of property
would ensue. Now Of this question from first to last the affirmation has
been taken for granted. On what grounds? On none
whatsoever.
Over and over again you have it from all sections
of the ruling few — from public bodies as well as from
individuals from Whig newspapers no not less than from
Tory Newspapers — that of radical reform general destruction
of property is [not only on the part of those who advocate
it the intended, but in itself] the certain consequence.
From Of all these men whose professed
assurance on this subject is so entire, from no one has there
ever been very the slightest attempt to produce any thing
like the so much as the slightest ground or commencement
of a ground for any such assurance.
The conclusion — perpetuation of the existing system
with the whole of its continually encreasing abuses
perpetuating a system of limited government in name a ruthless an absolutely
predatory despotism in effect — and thus acceded to by both parties,
on grounds facts in support of which they have none,
either of them been able to produce a single word — the
slightest attempt at argument.
|
Identifier: | JB/137/480/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1819-12-02 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
480 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
<…> co |
||
|
a. levy |
|||
|
47197 |
|||
