★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Indirect Legislation</head> | |||
<note>Non-seductive <hi rend="superscript">9</hi></note> | |||
<note>Rewards to accomplices</note> | |||
On this head [the English law, rules and practise <lb/>taken together, takes <add>preserves</add> a proper medium] the<lb/>course taken <add>medium preserved</add> by the English law, taking the rules and<lb/>the practise of it together, seems not to be injudicious.<lb/>As to <add>of</add> the employing rewards to engage <del>assistance it</del> <add>all hands in its</add><lb/>makes no single: but tbe assistance it <gap/> it <add>serves it makes no simple nor exception: but as to the</add><lb/><del>employs manner in which it employs the </del> service<lb/><del>which it bespeaks of them</del> <add>it <del>finds</del> sends them upon</add> is not to put the enemy<lb/>to death but to take him prisoner: in the event<lb/>of its being impossible to secure him <add>prevent his escape</add> by any other<lb/>means [than the last extremity] it gives indemnity,<lb/>but no reward. <note>Qu. an ita?</note> This at least seems to be the <del>policy</del> <add>determination</add><lb/>of the <del>common</del> <add>customary</add> law, to judge from the authorities.<lb/>Perhaps it would not do altogether amiss if in atrocious<lb/>cases it gave a small reward even though<lb/>such extremities should have become necessary. At<lb/>present if it came to a push a man would rather<lb/>let the most notorious criminal escape than secure<lb/>him at that rate: [since] by <del>letting him there would<lb/>be nothing to be got, and upon his | |||
</del> the escape of the<lb/>criminal the chance of the reward would only be<lb/><sic>weaken'd</sic>, [while] by his death it would be utterly put<lb/>an end to <add>destroyed</add>.<lb/>Caput lupinum - Pretender.<lb/><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
Indirect Legislation
Non-seductive 9
Rewards to accomplices
On this head [the English law, rules and practise
taken together, takes preserves a proper medium] the
course taken medium preserved by the English law, taking the rules and
the practise of it together, seems not to be injudicious.
As to of the employing rewards to engage assistance it all hands in its
makes no single: but tbe assistance it it serves it makes no simple nor exception: but as to the
employs manner in which it employs the service
which it bespeaks of them it finds sends them upon is not to put the enemy
to death but to take him prisoner: in the event
of its being impossible to secure him prevent his escape by any other
means [than the last extremity] it gives indemnity,
but no reward. Qu. an ita? This at least seems to be the policy determination
of the common customary law, to judge from the authorities.
Perhaps it would not do altogether amiss if in atrocious
cases it gave a small reward even though
such extremities should have become necessary. At
present if it came to a push a man would rather
let the most notorious criminal escape than secure
him at that rate: [since] by letting him there would
be nothing to be got, and upon his
the escape of the
criminal the chance of the reward would only be
weaken'd, [while] by his death it would be utterly put
an end to destroyed.
Caput lupinum - Pretender.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/087/056/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
056 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f9 / / / f12 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
27581 |
|||
