JB/137/327/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/327/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/137/327/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/137/327/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- marginal notes and part of heading in pencil --> <head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 4<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(5) <note>Charlemont treachery<lb/>Conclusion</note></p> <p>The utility of these discussions, if they have any, will<lb/>not be found confined to historical information relative to <add>on the subject of</add><lb/>the events now passed.  It <add>They</add> will <add>may</add> have its <add>their</add> application to<lb/>all future transactions between the members of the Democratic<lb/>party as such and those of the aristocratical.  On every<lb/>occasion amongst the things which the people will have to consider<lb/>whether it be in the nature of the <unclear>case</unclear> <add><unclear>man</unclear> and things</add>, <del>that unless</del><lb/>that unless under the influence of some temporary delirium <add>excitement</add><lb/><del>the</del> his share in the democratic interest should in the eyes<lb/>of a member of any account in the aristocratical party<lb/>be <del>of</del> equal <add>in</add> value to <del>that of his</del> his share in the aristocratical<lb/>interest. <add>power</add>  The case of Lord Charlemont will afford<lb/>them a lesson which might never to be out of mind.  They<lb/>will consider at all times whether any thing short of<lb/>a miracle, an incident too rare to be regarded on any<lb/>occasion as probable then cause one in the person of a<lb/> Member of the House of Lords, or a Seat holder <add>owner</add> of either<lb/><del>party</del> of the two <unclear>democracy</unclear> parties <del>pass</del> or any individual<lb/>dependent <del>up</del> in any way upon any such aristocratical<lb/>personage a sincere and steady friend.  Not that in<lb/>their <sic>contrarity</sic> of <del>interest</del> interests there is any reason<lb/>why at the hand of any such natural adversary they<lb/>should refuse any assistance whatever which he appears<lb/>capable and at the same time willing to afford.  So far as<lb/>it is his pleasure to carry them so far prudence will <add><gap/></add> suggest<lb/>the putting themselves under his prudence and suffering him to take the<lb/><add>lead</add></p> <p><note>[+] or any person who<lb/>"by his opulence<lb/>regards himself as<lb/>any thing like secure<lb/>of a County Seat.</note></p>         
<!-- marginal notes and part of heading in pencil --> <head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 4<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(5) <note>Charlemont treachery<lb/>Conclusion</note></p> <p>The utility of these discussions, if they have any, will<lb/>not be found confined to historical information relative to <add>on the subject of</add><lb/>the events now passed.  It <add>They</add> will <add>may</add> have its <add>their</add> application to<lb/>all future transactions between the members of the Democratic<lb/>party as such and those of the aristocratical.  On every<lb/>occasion amongst the things which the people will have to consider<lb/>whether it be in the nature of the case <add>man and things</add>, <del>that unless</del><lb/>that unless under the influence of some temporary delirium <add>excitement</add><lb/><del>the</del> his share in the democratic interest should in the eyes<lb/>of a member of any account in the aristocratical party<lb/>be <del>of</del> equal <add>in</add> value to <del>that of his</del> his share in the aristocratical<lb/>interest. <add>power</add>  The case of Lord Charlemont will afford<lb/>them a lesson which might never to be out of mind.  They<lb/>will consider at all times whether any thing short of<lb/>a miracle, an incident too rare to be regarded on any<lb/>occasion as probable then cause one in the person of a<lb/> Member of the House of Lords, or a Seat holder <add>owner</add> of either<lb/><del>party</del> of the two <unclear>domineering</unclear> parties <del>pass</del> or any individual<lb/>dependent <del>up</del> in any way upon any such aristocratical<lb/>personage a sincere and steady friend.  Not that in<lb/>their <sic>contrarity</sic> of <del>interest</del> interests there is any reason<lb/>why at the hand of any such natural adversary they<lb/>should refuse any assistance whatever which he appears<lb/>capable and at the same time willing to afford.  So far as<lb/>it is his pleasure to carry them so far prudence will <add>may</add> suggest<lb/>the putting themselves under his prudence and suffering him to take the<lb/><add>lead</add></p> <p><note>[+] or any person who<lb/>"by his opulence<lb/>regards himself as<lb/>any thing like secure<lb/>of a County Seat.</note></p>         




Line 8: Line 8:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:49, 7 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Feb. 4
Radicalism not dangerous

III Experience
II Ireland

(5) Charlemont treachery
Conclusion

The utility of these discussions, if they have any, will
not be found confined to historical information relative to on the subject of
the events now passed. It They will may have its their application to
all future transactions between the members of the Democratic
party as such and those of the aristocratical. On every
occasion amongst the things which the people will have to consider
whether it be in the nature of the case man and things, that unless
that unless under the influence of some temporary delirium excitement
the his share in the democratic interest should in the eyes
of a member of any account in the aristocratical party
be of equal in value to that of his his share in the aristocratical
interest. power The case of Lord Charlemont will afford
them a lesson which might never to be out of mind. They
will consider at all times whether any thing short of
a miracle, an incident too rare to be regarded on any
occasion as probable then cause one in the person of a
Member of the House of Lords, or a Seat holder owner of either
party of the two domineering parties pass or any individual
dependent up in any way upon any such aristocratical
personage a sincere and steady friend. Not that in
their contrarity of interest interests there is any reason
why at the hand of any such natural adversary they
should refuse any assistance whatever which he appears
capable and at the same time willing to afford. So far as
it is his pleasure to carry them so far prudence will may suggest
the putting themselves under his prudence and suffering him to take the
lead

[+] or any person who
"by his opulence
regards himself as
any thing like secure
of a County Seat.




Identifier: | JB/137/327/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-02-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

327

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

47044

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in