JB/123/022/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/123/022/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/123/022/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- in pencil --> <p>+ 5</p> <p>The Bill experienced (as under such circumstances<lb/>it may <del>be</del> well <add>be</add> imagined it would)<lb/>great opposition as well in or out of Parliament:<lb/>it was postponed against not only on<lb/>the part of the individuals whose houses<lb/>were <del>exposed</del> <add>consigned</add> by it to Demolition, but by<lb/>the Vestry of the United Parishes <hi rend="superscript">#</hi> <note># Review &amp;c<lb/>p.25</note>  <del>It</del> <add>That it</add> had not<lb/><del>however</del> been framed <add>however</add> without great consideration<lb/>and the most respectable professional concurrence,<lb/>may be inferred from the name of the first Earl<lb/>of Mansfield, at that time <sic>Sollicitor</sic> General,<lb/><del>when</del> <add>the intimacy <Add>of whose connection</add> with the principal of the live<lb/>Petitioners on behalf of of the Bill <sic>D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Markham<lb/>the present Archbishop of York is so well know,<lb/>together with the names of his <add>three</add> Brothers in Law<lb/>or Nephews in Law the Finches, standing amidst<lb/>a numerous and illustrious assemblage<lb/>of other names in <del>the</del> <add>a</add> list of Commissioners appointed <del>for it</del> in the Act.</p> <p>That care is so much stronger a one than the<lb/>present, that the precedent <add>though direct in its application as well to powers as to parties</add> might be admitted to be<lb/>a bad one without prejudice to the present Bill: for<lb/><hi rend="underline">here</hi> the benefit is surely in every dimension more<lb/>extensive, and there is not a hundredth part of the<lb/>hardship.</p> <p>(21)</p>  
<!-- in pencil --> <p>+ 5</p> <p>The Bill experienced (as under such circumstances<lb/>it may <del>be</del> well <add>be</add> imagined it would)<lb/>great opposition as well in as out of Parliament:<lb/>it was petitioned against not only on<lb/>the part of the individuals whose houses<lb/>were <del>exposed</del> <add>consigned</add> by it to Demolition, but by<lb/>the Vestry of the United Parishes <hi rend="superscript">#</hi> <note># Review &amp;c<lb/>p.25</note>  <del>It</del> <add>That it</add> had not<lb/><del>however</del> been framed <add>however</add> without great consideration<lb/>and the most respectable professional concurrence,<lb/>may be inferred from the name of the first Earl<lb/>of Mansfield, at that time <sic>Sollicitor</sic> General,<lb/><del>when</del> <add>the</add> intimacy <add>of whose connection</add> with the principal of the live<lb/>Petitioners on behalf of of the Bill <sic>D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Markham<lb/>the present Archbishop of York is so well know,<lb/>together with the names of his <add>three</add> Brothers in Law<lb/>or Nephews in Law the Finches, standing amidst<lb/>a numerous and illustrious assemblage<lb/>of other names in <del>the</del> <add>a</add> list of Commissioners appointed<lb/><del>for it</del> in the Act.</p> <p>That care is so much stronger a one than the<lb/>present, that the precedent <add>though direct in its application as well to powers as to parties</add> might be admitted to be<lb/>a bad one without prejudice to the present Bill: for<lb/><hi rend="underline">here</hi> the benefit is surely in every dimension more<lb/>extensive, and there is not a hundredth part of the<lb/>hardship.</p> <p>(21)</p>  




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 09:45, 11 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

+ 5

The Bill experienced (as under such circumstances
it may be well be imagined it would)
great opposition as well in as out of Parliament:
it was petitioned against not only on
the part of the individuals whose houses
were exposed consigned by it to Demolition, but by
the Vestry of the United Parishes # # Review &c
p.25
It That it had not
however been framed however without great consideration
and the most respectable professional concurrence,
may be inferred from the name of the first Earl
of Mansfield, at that time Sollicitor General,
when the intimacy of whose connection with the principal of the live
Petitioners on behalf of of the Bill Dr Markham
the present Archbishop of York is so well know,
together with the names of his three Brothers in Law
or Nephews in Law the Finches, standing amidst
a numerous and illustrious assemblage
of other names in the a list of Commissioners appointed
for it in the Act.

That care is so much stronger a one than the
present, that the precedent though direct in its application as well to powers as to parties might be admitted to be
a bad one without prejudice to the present Bill: for
here the benefit is surely in every dimension more
extensive, and there is not a hundredth part of the
hardship.

(21)



Identifier: | JB/123/022/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

022

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c21 / d5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41448

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in