JB/123/262/029: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/123/262/029: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- This is Page 21 of a printed text 'Wilson: Review of the project for building a new square at Westminster ... by a sufferer, Part I, 51 pp., London, 1757;' Only text with annotations has been transcribed -->
<!-- printed text with handwritten annotation transcribed as a Note --> <p>[21]<lb/>the said School, and original Proprietors<lb/>of an Estate in the Premises,<lb/>amounting in Value to several thousand<lb/>Pounds a T=Year, were not made<lb/>acquainted with the Intention of the<lb/>GENTLEMEN PROJECTORS, <sic>till</sic> their<lb/>petition had been referred to a Committee! &#x2014;<lb/>And <sic>tho'</sic> in the Bill it<lb/>was thus affirmed, That they were<lb/>willing and consenting, &amp;c. &#x2014; it is<lb/>certain, there <note><del>is</del> <add>was</add></note> no such MINUTE in <note>Nor have <gap/></note><lb/>the Chapter-Books; without which <note>agreed with ye</note<lb/>no such Affirmation could be properly <note>Dean &amp; Chapter</note><lb/>authorized or relied on. &#x2014; so that, <note>to this <gap/></note><lb/>whether we trace the Proceedings of <note>in Matters of</note><lb/>the Petitioners upwards or downwards, <note>ye highest Consequence</note><lb/>we find them alike obnoxious on the<lb/>Head of PRESUMPTION or DISINGENUITY <note>to them &amp; <gap/><lb/>successors.</note></p> <!-- printed text continues -->
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:16, 23 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

[21]
the said School, and original Proprietors
of an Estate in the Premises,
amounting in Value to several thousand
Pounds a T=Year, were not made
acquainted with the Intention of the
GENTLEMEN PROJECTORS, till their
petition had been referred to a Committee! —
And tho' in the Bill it
was thus affirmed, That they were
willing and consenting, &c. — it is
certain, there is was no such MINUTE in Nor have
the Chapter-Books; without which agreed with ye</note
no such Affirmation could be properly <note>Dean & Chapter

authorized or relied on. — so that, to this
whether we trace the Proceedings of in Matters of
the Petitioners upwards or downwards, ye highest Consequence
we find them alike obnoxious on the
Head of PRESUMPTION or DISINGENUITY to them &
successors.




Identifier: | JB/123/262/029"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

1757

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

262

Info in main headings field

Image

029

Titles

review of the project for building a new square said to be for the use of westminster-school

Category

printed material

Number of Pages

60

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

(viii, 51)

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

bentham's annotated copy of the statute; enfolded in a full-size brown wrapper

ID Number

41688

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in