JB/143/030/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/143/030/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Lucy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
that time it shows that punishment is either groundless<pb/>
that time it shows that punishment is either groundless<pb/>
or needless or both: since it shows the party who<lb/>
or needless or both: since it shows the party who<lb/>
at his <gap/> : which bury the case, there is no primary mischief. How </p>
at his <gap/> : which bury the case, there is no primary mischief. How it (?) was the best of the offence in <unclear></unclear><gap/> in general if </p>





Revision as of 10:29, 27 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

C
Of punishment in general

Exemptions
Lapse of time

Why punishment the above offences under the above exceptions are discharged
from punishment by a lapse of six months.

1. Because the
event shows there
is no mischief

1. Because if there be no prosecution in all
that time it shows that punishment is either groundless
---page break---
or needless or both: since it shows the party who
at his  : which bury the case, there is no primary mischief. How it (?) was the best of the offence in in general if




Identifier: | JB/143/030/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

143

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

030

Info in main headings field

of punishment in general

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / / / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48663

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in