JB/122/038/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/122/038/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/038/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- this page is organised in four columns --> <p>10 <sic>Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> 1808</p> <!-- headings in pencil --> <head>J.B. to Mallett for Audit Board</head> <p>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Present Case <!-- present case overwritten in bolder pencil, paragraph crossed through in pencil --></p> <p>38 &#x2014; 21.<lb/>Its favourableness<lb/>was established by their<lb/>taking no notice of<lb/>the complaints made<lb/>in J.B.'s hasty Letter<lb/>praying respite. p.26</p> <p>39 22<lb/>Setting aside casual<lb/>causes of displeasure,<lb/>it was not to be expected<lb/>that anonymous, invisible<lb/>&amp; thence irresponsible<lb/>Judges should<lb/>afford relief to a stranger<lb/>complaining against<lb/>a subordinate with<lb/>whom they were in<lb/>daily habits. p.26</p> <!-- in pencil --><p>Irresponsibility<lb/> 1. Impropriety of</p> <p>40 23.<lb/>Personal <gap/><lb/>&amp; sympathy towards<lb/>their subordinates are<lb/>the only considerations<lb/>by which Judges in<lb/>such a situation could<lb/>reasonably be expected<lb/>to be influenced. p.27</p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>Reasons</p> <p> 41 24<lb/>In the case of the<lb/>judicature, the Judges<lb/>being as above, anonymous,<lb/>invisible and irresponsible,<lb/>do not<lb/>like the <sic>Westm<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Hall<lb/>Judges <hi rend="underline">give reasons</hi><lb/>p.28</p> <p>42 &#x2014; 25<lb/>The Chancellor, the<lb/>highest Judge, acts<lb/>under the virtual<lb/>obligatory custom of<lb/>giving reasons &amp; is<lb/>thus individually responsible.</p> <p>Hence no one who<lb/>should have a complaint<lb/>against a Master <sic>wo<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic><lb/>regard his cause as<lb/>hopeless, how favourable<lb/>so can the disposition of<lb/>ye Chancellor towards the<lb/>Master were known to be</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column. Entire column crossed through in pencil.  Heading in pencil --> <p>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Audit &amp; Judicatory</p> <p>43 &#x2014; 26.<lb/>Objection 1 &#x2014; The Board<lb/>is not a judicatory.<lb/>p.29</p> <p>44 &#x2014; 27.<lb/>Answer &#x2014; Yes it is,<lb/>it is a judicatory in<lb/>which the functions of<lb/><sic>Plff</sic> are combined with<lb/>those of Judge &#x2014;<lb/>p. 29</p> <p>45 &#x2014; 28<lb/>On the Continent,<lb/>much business is done<lb/>by Judicatories thus<lb/>constituted &#x2014;<lb/>1, In Germany criminal<lb/>business at large <foreign><hi rend="underline">mode<lb/>inquisitorio</hi></foreign><lb/>2. So in Spain and Portugal<lb/>criminal business<lb/>in offences <sic>ag<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> Religion<lb/>p.29*</p> <p>46 29.<lb/>In a Court of Claims<lb/>that state of things is<lb/>reversed.  The functions<lb/>combined with those of<lb/>the Judge are those<lb/>of ye <sic>Deft.</sic> p. 29*</p> <p>47. 30<lb/>By this anomaly the<lb/>demand for individual<lb/>responsibility is not<lb/>lessened but <sic>encreased</sic><lb/>p.30</p> <p>48. 31<lb/>Its exercises within<lb/>its field the Inquisitorial<lb/>powers exercised by<lb/>the Inquisition  &amp;c &#x2014;<lb/>in theirs. p.30</p> <p>49. 32<lb/>The propriety of that<lb/>power is not here disputed.<lb/>p.30</p> <p>50 33<lb/>It was not by the<lb/>exercise of these powers<lb/>that the Inquisition considered<lb/>itself so justly<lb/>odious &amp; terrible, but by<lb/>ye anonymousness &amp;<lb/>invisibility of its Judges,<lb/>added to the nature of<lb/>ye offences of which it took<lb/>cognizance. p.31</p> <pb/> <!-- start of third column, heading in pencil -->  <p>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>1. Impropriety of</p> <p>50 &#x2014; 35 <!-- in pencil --> 1<lb/>Two modes by either<lb/>of which a Judge may<lb/>be rendered <!-- next word in pencil --> individually<lb/>responsible for his conduct<lb/>1. By speech, when the<lb/>place he speaks in is<lb/>open to ye public &#x2014;<lb/>2. By writing when his<lb/>signature is <sic>annext</sic><lb/>to the acts.</p> <p>The 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> mode is the<lb/>one adapted to the<lb/>judicatory in question<lb/>but not observed by it<lb/>p.37</p> <!-- line across the page in pencil, heading in pencil --> <p>Objection &#x2014; Ill will</p> <p>52. 35.<lb/>Objection 2. On this plan<lb/>of individual responsibility<lb/>the <sic>Commrs</sic> would be exposed<lb/>to <del>the</del> ill-will on<lb/>the part of Accountants,<lb/>the fear of which might<lb/>exercise a sinister interest,<lb/>dangerous to their<lb/>probity. p.33</p> <p>53 &#x2014; 86.<lb/>This supposed mischief<lb/>is not found to have<lb/>place even in the case<lb/>of those Judges who besides<lb/>being known as the<lb/>authors of their own acts<lb/>act singly. viz. the Chancellor<lb/>and ye Master of<lb/>ye Rolls. p.33</p> <pb/> <!-- start of fourth column, headings and paragraph numbers in pencil --> <p>V. Irresponsibility</p> <p>54 37<lb/>Where a man in power<lb/>is out of the reach of<lb/>Responsibility. Reason<lb/>instead of correcting<lb/>irritates.</p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in pencil --><p>Conclusion</p> <p>55 38<lb/> Of <del>When</del> the instances<lb/>in which abuse has place<lb/>in, so few do the instances<lb/>necessary to the correction<lb/>of it <sic>concurr,</sic> that when<lb/>they do, it a man's<lb/>duty to put them to<lb/>use. p. </p>
<!-- this page is organised in four columns --> <p>10 <sic>Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> 1808</p> <!-- headings in pencil --> <head>J.B. to Mallett for Audit Board</head> <p>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Present Case <!-- present case overwritten in bolder pencil, paragraph crossed through in pencil --></p> <p>38 &#x2014; 21.<lb/>Its favourableness<lb/>was established by their<lb/>taking no notice of<lb/>the complaints made<lb/>in J.B.'s hasty Letter<lb/>praying respite. p.26</p> <p>39 22<lb/>Setting aside casual<lb/>causes of displeasure,<lb/>it was not to be expected<lb/>that anonymous, invisible<lb/>&amp; thence irresponsible<lb/>Judges should<lb/>afford relief to a stranger<lb/>complaining against<lb/>a subordinate with<lb/>whom they were in<lb/>daily habits. p.26</p> <!-- in pencil --><p>Irresponsibility<lb/> 1. Impropriety of</p> <p>40 23.<lb/>Personal <unclear>conscience</unclear><lb/>&amp; sympathy towards<lb/>their subordinates are<lb/>the only considerations<lb/>by which Judges in<lb/>such a situation could<lb/>reasonably be expected<lb/>to be influenced. p.27</p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>Reasons</p> <p> 41 24<lb/>In the case of the<lb/>judicature, the Judges<lb/>being as above, anonymous,<lb/>invisible and irresponsible,<lb/>do not<lb/>like the <sic>Westm<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Hall<lb/>Judges <hi rend="underline">give reasons</hi><lb/>p.28</p> <p>42 &#x2014; 25<lb/>The Chancellor, the<lb/>highest Judge, acts<lb/>under the virtual<lb/>obligatory custom of<lb/>giving reasons &amp; is<lb/>thus individually responsible.</p> <p>Hence no one who<lb/>should have a complaint<lb/>against a Master <sic>wo<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic><lb/>regard his cause as<lb/>hopeless, how favourable<lb/>so can the disposition of<lb/>ye Chancellor towards the<lb/>Master were known to be</p> <pb/> <!-- start of second column. Entire column crossed through in pencil.  Heading in pencil --> <p>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Audit &amp; Judicatory</p> <p>43 &#x2014; 26.<lb/>Objection 1 &#x2014; The Board<lb/>is not a judicatory.<lb/>p.29</p> <p>44 &#x2014; 27.<lb/>Answer &#x2014; Yes it is,<lb/>it is a judicatory in<lb/>which the functions of<lb/><sic>Plff</sic> are combined with<lb/>those of Judge &#x2014;<lb/>p. 29</p> <p>45 &#x2014; 28<lb/>On the Continent,<lb/>much business is done<lb/>by Judicatories thus<lb/>constituted &#x2014;<lb/>1, In Germany criminal<lb/>business at large <foreign><hi rend="underline">mode<lb/>inquisitorio</hi></foreign><lb/>2. So in Spain and Portugal<lb/>criminal business<lb/>in offences <sic>ag<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> Religion<lb/>p.29*</p> <p>46 29.<lb/>In a Court of Claims<lb/>that state of things is<lb/>reversed.  The functions<lb/>combined with those of<lb/>the Judge are those<lb/>of ye <sic>Deft.</sic> p. 29*</p> <p>47. 30<lb/>By this anomaly the<lb/>demand for individual<lb/>responsibility is not<lb/>lessened but <sic>encreased</sic><lb/>p.30</p> <p>48. 31<lb/>Its exercises within<lb/>its field the Inquisitorial<lb/>powers exercised by<lb/>the Inquisition  &amp;c &#x2014;<lb/>in theirs. p.30</p> <p>49. 32<lb/>The propriety of that<lb/>power is not here disputed.<lb/>p.30</p> <p>50 33<lb/>It was not by the<lb/>exercise of these powers<lb/>that the Inquisition considered<lb/>itself so justly<lb/>odious &amp; terrible, but by<lb/>ye anonymousness &amp;<lb/>invisibility of its Judges,<lb/>added to the nature of<lb/>ye offences of which it took<lb/>cognizance. p.31</p> <pb/> <!-- start of third column, heading in pencil -->  <p>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>1. Impropriety of</p> <p>50 &#x2014; 35 <!-- in pencil --> 1<lb/>Two modes by either<lb/>of which a Judge may<lb/>be rendered <!-- next word in pencil --> individually<lb/>responsible for his conduct<lb/>1. By speech, when the<lb/>place he speaks in is<lb/>open to ye public &#x2014;<lb/>2. By writing when his<lb/>signature is <sic>annext</sic><lb/>to the acts.</p> <p>The 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> mode is the<lb/>one adapted to the<lb/>judicatory in question<lb/>but not observed by it<lb/>p.37</p> <!-- line across the page in pencil, heading in pencil --> <p>Objection &#x2014; Ill will</p> <p>52. 35.<lb/>Objection 2. On this plan<lb/>of individual responsibility<lb/>the <sic>Commrs</sic> would be exposed<lb/>to <del>the</del> ill-will on<lb/>the part of Accountants,<lb/>the fear of which might<lb/>exercise a sinister interest,<lb/>dangerous to their<lb/>probity. p.33</p> <p>53 &#x2014; 86.<lb/>This supposed mischief<lb/>is not found to have<lb/>place even in the case<lb/>of those Judges who besides<lb/>being known as the<lb/>authors of their own acts<lb/>act singly. viz. the Chancellor<lb/>and ye Master of<lb/>ye Rolls. p.33</p> <pb/> <!-- start of fourth column, headings and paragraph numbers in pencil --> <p>V. Irresponsibility</p> <p>54 37<lb/>Where a man in power<lb/>is out of the reach of<lb/>Responsibility. Reason<lb/>instead of correcting<lb/>irritates.</p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in pencil --><p>Conclusion</p> <p>55 38<lb/> Of <del>When</del> the instances<lb/>in which abuse has place<lb/>in, so few do the instances<lb/>necessary to the correction<lb/>of it <sic>concurr,</sic> that when<lb/>they do, it a man's<lb/>duty to put them to<lb/>use. p. </p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 15:16, 6 October 2020

'Click Here To Edit

10 Augt 1808

J.B. to Mallett for Audit Board

V. Irresponsibility
Present Case

38 — 21.
Its favourableness
was established by their
taking no notice of
the complaints made
in J.B.'s hasty Letter
praying respite. p.26

39 22
Setting aside casual
causes of displeasure,
it was not to be expected
that anonymous, invisible
& thence irresponsible
Judges should
afford relief to a stranger
complaining against
a subordinate with
whom they were in
daily habits. p.26

Irresponsibility
1. Impropriety of

40 23.
Personal conscience
& sympathy towards
their subordinates are
the only considerations
by which Judges in
such a situation could
reasonably be expected
to be influenced. p.27

Reasons

41 24
In the case of the
judicature, the Judges
being as above, anonymous,
invisible and irresponsible,
do not
like the Westmr Hall
Judges give reasons
p.28

42 — 25
The Chancellor, the
highest Judge, acts
under the virtual
obligatory custom of
giving reasons & is
thus individually responsible.

Hence no one who
should have a complaint
against a Master wod
regard his cause as
hopeless, how favourable
so can the disposition of
ye Chancellor towards the
Master were known to be


---page break---

V. Irresponsibility
Audit & Judicatory

43 — 26.
Objection 1 — The Board
is not a judicatory.
p.29

44 — 27.
Answer — Yes it is,
it is a judicatory in
which the functions of
Plff are combined with
those of Judge —
p. 29

45 — 28
On the Continent,
much business is done
by Judicatories thus
constituted —
1, In Germany criminal
business at large mode
inquisitorio

2. So in Spain and Portugal
criminal business
in offences agt Religion
p.29*

46 29.
In a Court of Claims
that state of things is
reversed. The functions
combined with those of
the Judge are those
of ye Deft. p. 29*

47. 30
By this anomaly the
demand for individual
responsibility is not
lessened but encreased
p.30

48. 31
Its exercises within
its field the Inquisitorial
powers exercised by
the Inquisition &c —
in theirs. p.30

49. 32
The propriety of that
power is not here disputed.
p.30

50 33
It was not by the
exercise of these powers
that the Inquisition considered
itself so justly
odious & terrible, but by
ye anonymousness &
invisibility of its Judges,
added to the nature of
ye offences of which it took
cognizance. p.31


---page break---

V. Irresponsibility
1. Impropriety of

50 — 35 1
Two modes by either
of which a Judge may
be rendered individually
responsible for his conduct
1. By speech, when the
place he speaks in is
open to ye public —
2. By writing when his
signature is annext
to the acts.

The 2d mode is the
one adapted to the
judicatory in question
but not observed by it
p.37

Objection — Ill will

52. 35.
Objection 2. On this plan
of individual responsibility
the Commrs would be exposed
to the ill-will on
the part of Accountants,
the fear of which might
exercise a sinister interest,
dangerous to their
probity. p.33

53 — 86.
This supposed mischief
is not found to have
place even in the case
of those Judges who besides
being known as the
authors of their own acts
act singly. viz. the Chancellor
and ye Master of
ye Rolls. p.33


---page break---

V. Irresponsibility

54 37
Where a man in power
is out of the reach of
Responsibility. Reason
instead of correcting
irritates.

Conclusion

55 38
Of When the instances
in which abuse has place
in, so few do the instances
necessary to the correction
of it concurr, that when
they do, it a man's
duty to put them to
use. p.




Identifier: | JB/122/038/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-08-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::38 [or] 21 - 55 [or] 38]]

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

038

Info in main headings field

JB to Mallett for Audit Board

Image

001

Titles

Irresponsibility

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in