★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/147/088/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>Does the < | <p>Does the <unclear>Reversioner</unclear> value it it more than it is worth?</p> | ||
<p> | <p>It is cheap only in the <gap/> that the interest of the future<lb/> | ||
patrons is entirely disregarded which seems to have been the case.</p> | patrons is entirely disregarded which seems to have been the case.</p> | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<p>But Reversionary grants may; it seems be <unclear>defended</unclear> <lb/> | <p>But Reversionary grants may; it seems be <unclear>defended</unclear> <lb/> | ||
and now let us | and now let us see by what and how<lb/> | ||
<gap/> < | Much ab<gap/> <unclear>problem</unclear> for the question has two sides</p> | ||
<p>1 <gap/> <add><gap/></add> On the other hand (continues the Report) Reversionary<lb/> | <p>1 <gap/> <add><gap/></add> On the other hand (continues the Report) Reversionary<lb/> | ||
Grants may be defended as a cheap and economical<lb/> | Grants may be defended as a cheap and economical<lb/> | ||
mode of confirming favour, of paying services<lb/> | mode of confirming favour, of paying services<lb/> | ||
by | by expectancy, rather than by natural Office or Pension.</p> | ||
<p>A | <p>A cheap mode of confirming favour? <gap/><lb/> | ||
sense and to whom | sense and to whom cheap <add>added?</add> to whom? To the<lb/> | ||
donor so far | donor so far cheap it might be of <del>the</del> by the donor<lb/> | ||
the gift were estimated <add>at</add> more than it was worth.<lb/> | the gift were estimated <add>at</add> more than it was worth.<lb/> | ||
but what should make it so. Present | but what should make it so. Present value of such<lb/> | ||
a reversion in <gap/> and <add>upon an average no more than</add> | a reversion in <gap/> and <add>upon an average no more than</add> a sixth only of that of <lb/> | ||
<del>the annu</del> an annual <gap/>ment to the same amount<lb/> | |||
in possession: <del>amount</del> value of a reversion of £3000<lb/> | in possession: <del>amount</del> value of a reversion of £3000<lb/> | ||
a year £500 a year and no more than this<lb/> | a year £500 a year and no more : than this<lb/> | ||
is what he would set it at this is what he would<lb/> | is what he would set it at this is what he would<lb/> | ||
give the patron the donor credit for and as more<lb/> | give the patron the donor credit for and as more<lb/> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
true it is that thus the favourite <del>may</del> with his service<lb/> | true it is that thus the favourite <del>may</del> with his service<lb/> | ||
or his no-service or his worse than no services<lb/> | or his no-service or his worse than no services<lb/> | ||
may be paid: thus it is that he <add>paid be then may be </add> may be paid but <lb/> | may be paid: thus it is that he <add><unclear>paid</unclear> be then may be </add> may be paid but <lb/> | ||
<gap/> time see at what expence.</p> | <gap/> time see at what expence.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
Does the Reversioner value it it more than it is worth?
It is cheap only in the that the interest of the future
patrons is entirely disregarded which seems to have been the case.
Such is the view of the Honourable Kinsmen Committee are the objections arguments
the chief of the objections which plead against contingent
"interests":
But Reversionary grants may; it seems be defended
and now let us see by what and how
Much ab problem for the question has two sides
1 On the other hand (continues the Report) Reversionary
Grants may be defended as a cheap and economical
mode of confirming favour, of paying services
by expectancy, rather than by natural Office or Pension.
A cheap mode of confirming favour?
sense and to whom cheap added? to whom? To the
donor so far cheap it might be of the by the donor
the gift were estimated at more than it was worth.
but what should make it so. Present value of such
a reversion in and upon an average no more than a sixth only of that of
the annu an annual ment to the same amount
in possession: amount value of a reversion of £3000
a year £500 a year and no more : than this
is what he would set it at this is what he would
give the patron the donor credit for and as more
"by expectation instead of actual office or pension.
true it is that thus the favourite may with his service
or his no-service or his worse than no services
may be paid: thus it is that he paid be then may be may be paid but
time see at what expence.
Identifier: | JB/147/088/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1810-03-23 |
1-2 |
||
147 |
Sinecures |
||
088 |
Sinecures |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
D9 / E1 |
||
49313 |
|||