★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<note>20</note> | |||
<head>Indirect</head> | |||
<note>Rewarding</note> | |||
<note>9. Indies<lb/>The civic care would then be a constant object<lb/> of pursuit<lb/></note><p>To obviate this <del>let</del> I can see no other way than<lb/>to oblige <del>the</del> a governor upon his quitting the<lb/>government to find security for his refunding the<lb/>difference in case <del>it should be determined</del> a decrease<lb/>should <del>ha</del> take place within a certain time after<lb/>such departure, and it should be determined by<lb/>competent authority that such decrease was owing <lb/>to measures <del>of him his taking</del> <add>which had his concurrence.</add> taken by him during<lb/>his administration: as on the other hand, it<lb/>might be made a matter of course (subject <add>however</add> to<lb/>alteration at the hands of the authority above<lb/>alluded to) that in case of an augmentation<lb/>he should share with his successor in the benefit<lb/>arising from it <add>such <sic>encrease</sic></add>.</p><p>I mention this as an improvement <add>establishment</add> suggested<lb/> by theory: whether <del>it is this degree of</del><lb/>such a refinement could be adopted in practise<lb/>[it will be worth <add>belongs</add> the experiment to decide] those<lb/>who have had experience <note>have experience in <lb/>instruct them <lb/>their favour<lb/></note> will be the better qualified <lb/>to decide.<lb/></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
20
Indirect
Rewarding
9. Indies
The civic care would then be a constant object
of pursuit
To obviate this let I can see no other way than
to oblige the a governor upon his quitting the
government to find security for his refunding the
difference in case it should be determined a decrease
should ha take place within a certain time after
such departure, and it should be determined by
competent authority that such decrease was owing
to measures of him his taking which had his concurrence. taken by him during
his administration: as on the other hand, it
might be made a matter of course (subject however to
alteration at the hands of the authority above
alluded to) that in case of an augmentation
he should share with his successor in the benefit
arising from it such encrease.
I mention this as an improvement establishment suggested
by theory: whether it is this degree of
such a refinement could be adopted in practise
[it will be worth belongs the experiment to decide] those
who have had experience have experience in
instruct them
their favour
will be the better qualified
to decide.
|
Identifier: | JB/087/146/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
146 |
indirect |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f17 / f18 / f19 / f20 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
27671 |
|||
