★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>11 July 1808 + 2 <note>2<lb/>Answers<lb/>Query 1<note></p> <p>justice could <add><del>can</del> | <!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>11 July 1808 + 2 <note>2<lb/>Answers<lb/>Query 1</note></p> <p>justice could <add><del>can</del></add> receive <add>in what I am altogether at a loss to conceive,</add> receive any <sic>encrease</sic>. If, <del>it had <gap/></del><lb/>finding <del>that</del> <add>the</add> information, <add>given in the clause in question of that pubic document</add> not sufficiently satisfactory, it had<lb/>occurred to him to quote the clause stating in what respect<lb/>it failed of being satisfactory, <add>I should <del>the Accountant would</add> I should</del> not have<lb/>had to contend with the <del>uncertainty I <gap/></del> <add>perplexity <gap/> which <del>he <gap/></del> I am</add> now harbouring</p> <p><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] In the first of <del>my</del> <add>the</add><lb/>two <del>first</del> Letters <del.to</del><lb/>which accompanied<lb/>my Account (date<lb/>if the Letters in July<lb/>1807) <del><gap/> it 22 <gap/>,?del><lb/>a paragraph, numbered<lb/>3, is in these words, viz<lb/>..."The nature of the<lb/>"transaction, in the<lb/>"course of which the<lb/>"money in question<lb/."was received by me,<lb/>"and the history of<lb/>"it down to June<lb/>"1798 may be<lb/>"seen in my evidence,<lb/>"as given by<lb/>"me to the Committee<lb/>"on Finance, and<lb/>"printed in the 28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi><lb/>"of their reports."<lb/><del>C</del> In this document,</note><lb/><del>In <add>his <gap/></add> my examination before the said Committee,</del> as printed in<lb/>p.76 of their said report, may be seen a statement made<lb/>by <del>myself <add>himself</add</del> <add>myself</add> of one authority received by <del>one</del> <add>me <del>him</del></add> to the same<lb/>effect at an earlier period, viz. in July 1793: at which<lb/>time as <del>I there say</del> <add><del>In</del. I there say —</add> "I was twice called upon, and both<lb/>times in the same terms" '<hi rend="underline">to take my arrangements</hi>.' <!-- next paragraph crossed through in pencil --> The<lb/>person therein referred to were perfectly known to the persons<lb/>to whom <del>I</del> <add>he on the occasion of their <del><gap/></del> statement, he</add> too was addressing <del>myself</del> <add>himself</add>. Not a syllable of it<lb/>was ever <sic>contraverted</sic> by any body. If after the information<lb/><add>thus</add> already received from the highest source, the<lb/>Chief Inspector <del>insists</del> <add><gap/> is pleased to insist</add> upon any ulterior information or<lb/>explanation from a so much inferior source I have <add>the Accountant</add><lb/>no other objection to the furnishing it, than what is exhibited<lb/>by the idea of the useless trouble it would <del>afford</del><lb/>give to <del>myself</del> <add>himself</add> to furnish so much irrelevant matter,<lb/>and to the Board to read and consider it. <!-- end of crossed out section --></p> <p>Here then is <del>the</del> information of a still more particular <gap/><lb/>already <del>given</del> furnished, and from the inferior source<lb/>these unnecessarily <gap/> to viz. the declaration of the Accountant<lb/>himself: the question therefore was read is doubly <gap/>.<lb/>Considerations of decorum and procedure, <del>printed<d/el> <add>restrained</add><lb/> me, on that occasion, from naming either of the two <gap/><lb/>I had in view. If the object of the query of <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Chief Inspectors'<lb/>was to know who they were, he should have <del>said so</del><lb/>declared as <gap/>: <add>on this head</add> finding him not satisfied with <add>what is above</add> <del>that</del>, it is impossible<lb/>for the <del>to</del> so much as to guess what it is would satisfy him.</p> | ||
11 July 1808 + 2 2
Answers
Query 1
justice could can receive in what I am altogether at a loss to conceive, receive any encrease. If, it had
finding that the information, given in the clause in question of that pubic document not sufficiently satisfactory, it had
occurred to him to quote the clause stating in what respect
it failed of being satisfactory, I should the Accountant would I should not have
had to contend with the uncertainty I perplexity which he I am now harbouring
[+] [+] In the first of my the
two first Letters <del.to
which accompanied
my Account (date
if the Letters in July
1807) it 22 ,?del>
a paragraph, numbered
3, is in these words, viz
..."The nature of the
"transaction, in the
"course of which the
"money in question<lb/."was received by me,
"and the history of
"it down to June
"1798 may be
"seen in my evidence,
"as given by
"me to the Committee
"on Finance, and
"printed in the 28th
"of their reports."C In this document,
In his my examination before the said Committee, as printed in
p.76 of their said report, may be seen a statement made
by myself <add>himself</add myself of one authority received by one me him to the same
effect at an earlier period, viz. in July 1793: at which
time as I there say In</del. I there say — "I was twice called upon, and both
times in the same terms" 'to take my arrangements.' The
person therein referred to were perfectly known to the persons
to whom I he on the occasion of their statement, he too was addressing myself himself. Not a syllable of it
was ever contraverted by any body. If after the information
thus already received from the highest source, the
Chief Inspector insists is pleased to insist upon any ulterior information or
explanation from a so much inferior source I have the Accountant
no other objection to the furnishing it, than what is exhibited
by the idea of the useless trouble it would afford
give to myself himself to furnish so much irrelevant matter,
and to the Board to read and consider it.
Here then is the information of a still more particular
already given furnished, and from the inferior source
these unnecessarily to viz. the declaration of the Accountant
himself: the question therefore was read is doubly .
Considerations of decorum and procedure, printed<d/el> restrained
me, on that occasion, from naming either of the two
I had in view. If the object of the query of Mr Chief Inspectors'
was to know who they were, he should have said so
declared as : on this head finding him not satisfied with what is above that, it is impossible
for the to so much as to guess what it is would satisfy him.
|
Identifier: | JB/122/169/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-07-11 |
|||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
169 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D2 / F2 |
||
|
TH 1806 |
|||
|
Andre Morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
