JB/122/180/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/180/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>12 July 1808 + <lb/><note>Answer<lb/>Query 3</note><lb/>(2</p> <p>With the help of such additional information and<lb/>assistance as <del>I <add>obtained</add> </del> on the same occasion, <add>I obtained</add> from my<lb/>Brothers then late Foreman in respect of the <gap/> in<lb/>question, viz. Mr John Lloyd, (the person named<lb/>in the Query subjoined in my first letter to the<lb/>Board) these papers <del> <gap/> the <gap/> were</del> <add>proved</add> sufficient for<lb/>the purpose above mentioned &#x2014; <del>and which was</del> the only<lb/>purpose <del>I had</del> which, <hi rend="underline">in applying for them</hi>, I<lb/>had in view: for <del>and if as</del> by my said first<lb/>letter <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <note>+ 14 July 1807</note>; and for the reason therein given <del>I</del> it had<lb/>never entered into my conception, that, in respect of the<lb/>£2,000 in question, or any part of it, I had any<lb/>account to render to any body.</p> <p>Had it been to a stranger that the application had<lb/>been <del><gap/><?del> to be made, <del>there would naturally</del> <add> the intercourse would, probably enough</add> have been<lb/><del>some <add>written</add> correspondence on the</del> carried on in some such shape<lb/>that some written record of it would have been preserved.<lb/>But, my Brother and I occupying at times either the same<lb/>house, or two contiguous houses, and being all along upon that<lb?>sort of footing, which is natural as between brothers, there was <!-- continues in margin --> nothing in the nature<lb/>of note our application<lb/>that could fix it<lb/>either on paper<lb/>or on the memory.</p> <p><!-- brackets in pencil --> [<del>Requisition the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> &#x2014; "And to furnish proof that the<lb/>"articles stated in the extracts from the books were<lb/>"actually received by him."</del>]</p> <p><!-- bracketed number in pencil --> <del>[3] My answer to this requisition will be given <add> the</add> <lb/><gap/> understood, by being justified to the <gap/> of those<lb/>in the course of the Answer which I proceed to give <lb/>to the preamble to the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Query</del></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:05, 30 November 2020

'Click Here To Edit

12 July 1808 +
Answer
Query 3

(2

With the help of such additional information and
assistance as I obtained on the same occasion, I obtained from my
Brothers then late Foreman in respect of the in
question, viz. Mr John Lloyd, (the person named
in the Query subjoined in my first letter to the
Board) these papers the were proved sufficient for
the purpose above mentioned — and which was the only
purpose I had which, in applying for them, I
had in view: for and if as by my said first
letter + + 14 July 1807; and for the reason therein given I it had
never entered into my conception, that, in respect of the
£2,000 in question, or any part of it, I had any
account to render to any body.

Had it been to a stranger that the application had
been <?del> to be made, there would naturally the intercourse would, probably enough have been
some written correspondence on the carried on in some such shape
that some written record of it would have been preserved.
But, my Brother and I occupying at times either the same
house, or two contiguous houses, and being all along upon that<lb?>sort of footing, which is natural as between brothers, there was nothing in the nature
of note our application
that could fix it
either on paper
or on the memory.

[Requisition the 2d — "And to furnish proof that the
"articles stated in the extracts from the books were
"actually received by him."
]

[3] My answer to this requisition will be given the
understood, by being justified to the of those
in the course of the Answer which I proceed to give
to the preamble to the 3d Query




Identifier: | JB/122/180/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

180

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E2

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in