★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
capable of furnishing<lb/> | capable of furnishing<lb/> | ||
evidence.</p><pb/> | evidence.</p><pb/> | ||
<p><unclear>Scrutation</unclear></p> | |||
<p>be <gap/> a d<gap/>d</p> | |||
<p>1. No person <add>In England <add><del>No use</del></add></add><add><gap/></add>of collector<lb/> | |||
takeens - therefore as<lb/> | |||
need of the remedy</p> | |||
<p>2. Judges <sic>compleatly</sic><lb/> | |||
exposed to the public<lb/> | |||
eye.</p> | |||
<p>In France as danger</p> | |||
<p>In England, some</p><pb/> | |||
<p><del><gap/></del> 30 May 1803</p> | |||
<p>Ordo of preferability<lb/> | |||
in casual evidence</p> | |||
<p>1. Parol scrutinized <add>cross examine<add>cross examined</add></add><lb/> | |||
registered <add>minuted</add> with opportunity<lb/> | |||
of con<gap/>tation</p> | |||
<p>2. Written judicially<lb/> | |||
uttered and with oppor<lb/> | |||
uttered.</p> | |||
<p>3. Parol uncross examined<lb/> | |||
but minuted</p> | |||
<p><del>3</del>4. Written extra-judicially<lb/> | |||
uttered -<lb/> | |||
N.B. Parol extrajudicially<lb/> | |||
uttered<lb/> | |||
as Hearsay</p> | |||
<p>45. Hearsay evidence<lb/> | |||
Questions as to each<lb/> | |||
1. <del>W</del> In what cases<lb/> | |||
inadmissible <lb/> | |||
2. In what admissible<lb/> | |||
3. Degree of credit</p> | |||
<p>Modification in each</p> | |||
<p>1. Self evidence</p> | |||
<p>2. <del>defen</del> Evidence of<lb/> | |||
witness corrected with<lb/> | |||
Self</p> | |||
<p>3. Dif<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> evidence</p> | |||
<p>4. d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of witness connected<lb/> | |||
with Dif:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></p> | |||
<p>II. In <gap/>penuli</p> | |||
<p>1. Best to what not<lb/> | |||
applicable definition</p> | |||
<p>2. Best evidence <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
persuasive in that which<lb/> | |||
ought to be and will be <lb/> | |||
if &c</p> | |||
<p>2</p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<p>3. Characters of but evidence</p> | |||
<p><del>34</del><hi rend="superscript">5</hi> <hi rend="superscript">1</hi>Rank of <gap/> of<lb/> | |||
evidence according to<lb/> | |||
more characters.</p> | |||
<p>5<hi rend="superscript">6</hi>. What <add>perfections</add> depend on the<lb/> | |||
legislature what not.</p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<p>Non sequitur because<lb/> | |||
this is the part that not<lb/> | |||
others Bond to rewards</p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<p>Butlers definition of <lb/> | |||
"<hi rend="underline">best evidence</hi>, the same<lb/> | |||
as <gap/>rts?</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
utation
1. To prevent difficultate invention
and thence by dispair of
successful invention a producer pre
mendacityveracity.
1. Answers suddenimmediate shewn
unpremeditated
2. Questions one by one,
correspondent answers to
each, before answer is known
3. Questions grounded further
answers.
4. Depositions naturally concealed
II. Do and to draw out
the whole statement - that
which is favourable to
the invoking party, as
well as a caution.
5. Cross-Examination.
This first?
N.B. This finds the
witness as an unworthy one.
1. of between Witness by
adverse party ext
II do means as before and
in perception
6. Of witness, by adverse
witness a really
prition.
7. The abuse in prevention
Arranguments } justices }to for personality
the }same or to ends by
III. The offendg {the a known chance of
correctionsubsequent{ or detection
by other {ulterior evidence
and to afford the clearer ground
and for ground} a prosecution
in case } of mendacity
8. Registration of the testimony.
—
9. Recollections revisal.
(This also as a remedy
against so {incorrectness)
1.firm right of the
other evidence
2. After do.
—
10. Publicity of examination. — This as a check
upon the Registration
to insure its correctness &
veracity.
—
11. Publication of evidence
— when it is worthwhile:
This both insures
correctness of registration
and gains the requisite
confirmation to persons
capable of furnishing
evidence.
---page break---
Scrutation
be a dd
1. No person In England <add>No use</add>of collector
takeens - therefore as
need of the remedy
2. Judges compleatly
exposed to the public
eye.
In France as danger
In England, some
---page break---
30 May 1803
Ordo of preferability
in casual evidence
1. Parol scrutinized cross examine<add>cross examined</add>
registered minuted with opportunity
of contation
2. Written judicially
uttered and with oppor
uttered.
3. Parol uncross examined
but minuted
34. Written extra-judicially
uttered -
N.B. Parol extrajudicially
uttered
as Hearsay
45. Hearsay evidence
Questions as to each
1. W In what cases
inadmissible
2. In what admissible
3. Degree of credit
Modification in each
1. Self evidence
2. defen Evidence of
witness corrected with
Self
3. Dift evidence
4. do of witness connected
with Dif:t
II. In penuli
1. Best to what not
applicable definition
2. Best evidence
persuasive in that which
ought to be and will be
if &c
2
—
3. Characters of but evidence
345 1Rank of of
evidence according to
more characters.
56. What perfections depend on the
legislature what not.
—
Non sequitur because
this is the part that not
others Bond to rewards
—
Butlers definition of
"best evidence, the same
as rts?
Identifier: | JB/109/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1803-05-30 |
|||
109 |
Evidence |
||
012 |
|||
001 |
Scrutation / Ordo & preferability |
||
Rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
1800 |
|||
1800 |
|||
35667 |
|||