JB/109/012/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/109/012/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:
capable of furnishing<lb/>
capable of furnishing<lb/>
evidence.</p><pb/>
evidence.</p><pb/>
<p><unclear>Scrutation</unclear></p>
<p>be <gap/> a d<gap/>d</p>
<p>1. No person <add>In England <add><del>No use</del></add></add><add><gap/></add>of collector<lb/>
takeens - therefore as<lb/>
need of the remedy</p>
<p>2. Judges <sic>compleatly</sic><lb/>
exposed to the public<lb/>
eye.</p>
<p>In France as danger</p>
<p>In England, some</p><pb/>
<p><del><gap/></del> 30 May 1803</p>
<p>Ordo of preferability<lb/>
in casual evidence</p>
<p>1. Parol scrutinized <add>cross examine<add>cross examined</add></add><lb/>
registered <add>minuted</add> with opportunity<lb/>
of con<gap/>tation</p>
<p>2. Written judicially<lb/>
uttered and with oppor<lb/>
uttered.</p>
<p>3. Parol uncross examined<lb/>
but minuted</p>
<p><del>3</del>4. Written extra-judicially<lb/>
uttered -<lb/>
N.B. Parol extrajudicially<lb/>
uttered<lb/>
as Hearsay</p>
<p>45. Hearsay evidence<lb/>
Questions as to each<lb/>
1. <del>W</del> In what cases<lb/>
inadmissible <lb/>
2. In what admissible<lb/>
3. Degree of credit</p>
<p>Modification in each</p>
<p>1. Self evidence</p>
<p>2. <del>defen</del> Evidence of<lb/>
witness corrected with<lb/>
Self</p>
<p>3. Dif<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> evidence</p>
<p>4. d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of witness connected<lb/>
with Dif:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></p>
<p>II. In <gap/>penuli</p>
<p>1. Best to what not<lb/>
applicable definition</p>
<p>2. Best evidence <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
persuasive in that which<lb/>
ought to be and will be <lb/>
if &amp;c</p>
<p>2</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>3. Characters of but  evidence</p>
<p><del>34</del><hi rend="superscript">5</hi> <hi rend="superscript">1</hi>Rank of <gap/> of<lb/>
evidence according to<lb/>
more characters.</p>
<p>5<hi rend="superscript">6</hi>. What <add>perfections</add> depend on the<lb/>
legislature what not.</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>Non sequitur because<lb/>
this is the part that not<lb/>
others Bond to rewards</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>Butlers definition of <lb/>
"<hi rend="underline">best evidence</hi>, the same<lb/>
as <gap/>rts?</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 21:01, 5 December 2020

Click Here To Edit

utation

1. To prevent difficultate invention
and thence by dispair of
successful invention a producer pre
mendacityveracity.

1. Answers suddenimmediate shewn
unpremeditated

2. Questions one by one,
correspondent answers to
each, before answer is known

3. Questions grounded further
answers.

4. Depositions naturally concealed

II. Do and to draw out
the whole statement - that
which is favourable to
the invoking party, as
well as a caution.

5. Cross-Examination.
This first?

N.B. This finds the
witness as an unworthy one.
1. of between Witness by
adverse party ext
II do means as before and
in perception

6. Of witness, by adverse
witness a really
prition.

7. The abuse in prevention
Arranguments } justices }to for personality
the }same or to ends by
III. The offendg {the a known chance of
correctionsubsequent{ or detection
by other {ulterior evidence
and to afford the clearer ground
and for ground} a prosecution
in case } of mendacity

8. Registration of the testimony.


9. Recollections revisal.

(This also as a remedy
against so {incorrectness)
1.firm right of the
other evidence

2. After do.


10. Publicity of examination. — This as a check
upon the Registration
to insure its correctness &
veracity.


11. Publication of evidence
— when it is worthwhile:
This both insures
correctness of registration
and gains the requisite
confirmation to persons
capable of furnishing
evidence.


---page break---

Scrutation

be a dd

1. No person In England <add>No use</add>of collector
takeens - therefore as
need of the remedy

2. Judges compleatly
exposed to the public
eye.

In France as danger

In England, some


---page break---

30 May 1803

Ordo of preferability
in casual evidence

1. Parol scrutinized cross examine<add>cross examined</add>
registered minuted with opportunity
of contation

2. Written judicially
uttered and with oppor
uttered.

3. Parol uncross examined
but minuted

34. Written extra-judicially
uttered -
N.B. Parol extrajudicially
uttered
as Hearsay

45. Hearsay evidence
Questions as to each
1. W In what cases
inadmissible
2. In what admissible
3. Degree of credit

Modification in each

1. Self evidence

2. defen Evidence of
witness corrected with
Self

3. Dift evidence

4. do of witness connected
with Dif:t

II. In penuli

1. Best to what not
applicable definition

2. Best evidence
persuasive in that which
ought to be and will be
if &c

2


3. Characters of but evidence

345 1Rank of of
evidence according to
more characters.

56. What perfections depend on the
legislature what not.


Non sequitur because
this is the part that not
others Bond to rewards


Butlers definition of
"best evidence, the same
as rts?



Identifier: | JB/109/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109.

Date_1

1803-05-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

109

Main Headings

Evidence

Folio number

012

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Scrutation / Ordo & preferability

Category

Rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

35667

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in