JB/087/164/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/087/164/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<note></note>
'''[{{fullurl:JB/087/164/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/087/164/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>26</note>
 
<head>Indirect</head>
 
<note>Corpus delicti</note>
 
<p><add>particular</add> conventions is the same for all.] Marriages<lb/>though for a long time not recorded by any evidence<lb/>more permanent than that of an evanescent ceremony,<lb/>I consider as belonging to <add>coming under</add> the preceding titles.<lb/><gap/> Papers by their distinctions, I <del>a</del> shall<lb/>take this place <add>I don't</add> to lay it down as a general rule<lb/>that there is no act or <add>other</add> event <del>that can since as<lb/>on</del> of these that constitute a ground <add><del>are</del> are efficient causes</add> of title, but<lb/>what the legislature <del>legislator</del> ought to make effectual <add>provision</add> for<lb/>preserving the remembrance of, where the importance<lb/>of the right is such as renders it worth while.<lb/></p><p>I wonder how long it would have been before<lb/><del>the legislator would have thought it</del> would have<lb/><del>entered</del> occurred to the legislator that memory<lb/>of these <del>most important of all documents</del> <add>interesting events</add> was worth<lb/>preserving.  Fortunately <add>in the reign of King William</add> the <del>cond</del> events themselves<lb/>presented themselves as proper subjects of taxation: <lb/><note>6.&amp;7. W.3. c.6. &sect;.24.<lb/>7&amp;8. W.3. c.35. &sect;.5.<lb/></note>account was therefore to be taken of them: the <sic>burthen</sic> was soon removed, and the benefit remains.<lb/></p><p>Even more the security <del>to</del> given to the rights<lb/>that depend upon <add>grounded on</add>  these event is neither so entire <add>certain</add> as<lb/>it ought to be nor so universal.  Every thing is trusted<lb/> to a single copy: [why should not] transcripts <add>should</add> be<lb/>made <add>at certain periods</add> from the Parochial Registers and sent to some<lb/> <note>more <lb/>superior
</note></p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 21:38, 13 December 2020

Click Here To Edit

26

Indirect

Corpus delicti

particular conventions is the same for all.] Marriages
though for a long time not recorded by any evidence
more permanent than that of an evanescent ceremony,
I consider as belonging to coming under the preceding titles.
Papers by their distinctions, I a shall
take this place I don't to lay it down as a general rule
that there is no act or other event that can since as
on
of these that constitute a ground are are efficient causes of title, but
what the legislature legislator ought to make effectual provision for
preserving the remembrance of, where the importance
of the right is such as renders it worth while.

I wonder how long it would have been before
the legislator would have thought it would have
entered occurred to the legislator that memory
of these most important of all documents interesting events was worth
preserving. Fortunately in the reign of King William the cond events themselves
presented themselves as proper subjects of taxation:
6.&7. W.3. c.6. §.24.
7&8. W.3. c.35. §.5.
account was therefore to be taken of them: the burthen was soon removed, and the benefit remains.

Even more the security to given to the rights
that depend upon grounded on these event is neither so entire certain as
it ought to be nor so universal. Every thing is trusted
to a single copy: [why should not] transcripts should be
made at certain periods from the Parochial Registers and sent to some
more
superior



























Identifier: | JB/087/164/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

087

Main Headings

indirect legislation

Folio number

164

Info in main headings field

indirect

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

27689

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in