JB/122/216/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/216/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/216/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>15 July 1808 + 16 <del>17</del><lb/><note>Answer<lb/>Query 6</note></p> <p><note>10 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1800<lb/>24 March 1801.</note></p> <p>1. For proof of my being, <del>considered</del> on the 10<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of August<lb/>1800, and thereafter down to the 24<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of March 1801,<lb/>considered, by the Lords of the Treasury, and the Secretary<lb/>of State, <del>the then Duke of Portland</del> <add>as</add> entitled on the count<lb/>of the relinquishment of the undertaking in question, viz.<lb/>the intended Penitentiary Establishment, <add>to compensation,</add> I have <unclear>subjorn</unclear> a few<lb/><del>passages</del> <add>short extracts</add> from divers Treasury <gap/> and Letters that<lb/>may been seen in a document, printed for the House of<lb/>Commons, by order dated 12 June 1801, and intituled <note>12 June 1801</note><lb/>"Further Proceedings of the Lords Commissioners of his<lb/>"Majesty's Treasury &amp;c respecting the matters stated<lb/>"in the Reports of the Committee of Finance, so far as<lb/>"they relate to the several Offices concerned in the Receipt<lb/>"and Expenditure of the Public money."</p> <p>P. 79 <del><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 9 Title</del> "28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Report Penitentiary Establishment<lb/><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 9.<lb/>"Copy of Treasury Minute of the 13<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> August 1800. <note>13 August 1800</note><lb/>Extract &#x2014; "But they" (the Lords of the Treasury) "<sic>submitt</sic> to<lb/>"his Grace, whether, by way of "experiment, it may be<lb/>"fit to carry it into effect on a <gap/> limited Scale,<lb/>"or whether, under all the Circumstances, it may be advisable<lb/>"at the present time, to relinquish the Plan altogether.<lb/>"In the latter Event, their Lordships shall feel<lb/>"it incumbent on them to make such Compensation to<lb/>"<sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham, as the loss he has sustained in preparing<lb/."for this Undertaking may appear to them to deserve."</p> <p><del>N.B. It might from here be supposed that, <gap/>, if<lb/>on the subject of compensation thus stated, something had <add>then recently</add> been<lb/>said, to which I had been party: but nothing either by me,<lb/>nothing on that subject had ever been no such claim had ever been<lb/><add>preferred</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin -->or meant to be preferred<lb/><add>and</add> my aversion to the idea<lb/>having been stands declared<lb/>in sufficiently explicit<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> terms in my Examination before <gap/>: and the sentiments therein declared have all along remained unchanged.</del></p>           
<!-- header and marginal note in pencil --> <p>15 July 1808 + 16 <del>17</del><lb/><note>Answer<lb/>Query 6</note></p> <p>1. For proof of my being, <del>considered</del> on the 10<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of August <note>10 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1800</note><lb/>1800, and thereafter down to the 24<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of March 1801, <note>24 March 1801.</note><lb/>considered, by the Lords of the Treasury, and the Secretary<lb/>of State, <del>then the Duke of Portland</del> <add>as</add> entitled on the count<lb/>of the relinquishment of the undertaking in question, viz.<lb/>the intended Penitentiary Establishment, <add>to compensation,</add> I here subjoin a few<lb/><del>passages</del> <add>short extracts</add> from divers Treasury Minutes and Letters that<lb/>may been seen in a document, printed for the House of<lb/>Commons, by order dated 12 June 1801, and intituled <note>12 June 1801</note><lb/>"Further Proceedings of the Lords Commissioners of his<lb/>"Majesty's Treasury &amp;c . respecting the matters stated<lb/>"in the Reports of the Committee of Finance, so far as<lb/>"they relate to the several Offices concerned in the Receipt<lb/>"and Expenditure of the Public money."</p> <p>P. 79 <del><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 9 Title</del> "28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Report Penitentiary Establishment<lb/> <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 9.</p> <p>"Copy of Treasury Minute of the 13<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> August 1800. <note>13 August 1800</note><lb/>Extract &#x2014; "But they" (the Lords of the Treasury) "<sic>submitt</sic> to<lb/>"his Grace, whether, by way of Experiment, it may be<lb/>"fit to carry it into effect on a more limited Scale,<lb/>"or whether, under all the Circumstances, it may be advisable<lb/>"at the present time, to relinquish the Plan altogether.<lb/>"In the latter Event, their Lordships shall feel<lb/>"it incumbent on them to make such Compensation to<lb/>"<sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Bentham, as the loss he has sustained in preparing<lb/>"for this Undertaking may appear to them to deserve."</p> <p><del>N.B. It might from hence be supposed, that, <gap/>, if<lb/>on the subject of compensation thus started, something had <add>then recently</add> been<lb/>said, to which I had been party: but nothing neither by me,<lb/>nothing on that subject had ever been no such claim had ever been<lb/><add>preferred</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin -->or meant to be preferred<lb/><add>and</add> my aversion to the idea<lb/>having been stands declared<lb/>in sufficiently explicit<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> terms in my Examination beforementioned: and the sentiments therein declared have all along remained unchanged.</del></p>           






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 10:47, 16 December 2020

'Click Here To Edit

15 July 1808 + 16 17
Answer
Query 6

1. For proof of my being, considered on the 10th of August 10 Aug. 1800
1800, and thereafter down to the 24th of March 1801, 24 March 1801.
considered, by the Lords of the Treasury, and the Secretary
of State, then the Duke of Portland as entitled on the count
of the relinquishment of the undertaking in question, viz.
the intended Penitentiary Establishment, to compensation, I here subjoin a few
passages short extracts from divers Treasury Minutes and Letters that
may been seen in a document, printed for the House of
Commons, by order dated 12 June 1801, and intituled 12 June 1801
"Further Proceedings of the Lords Commissioners of his
"Majesty's Treasury &c . respecting the matters stated
"in the Reports of the Committee of Finance, so far as
"they relate to the several Offices concerned in the Receipt
"and Expenditure of the Public money."

P. 79 No 9 Title "28th Report Penitentiary Establishment
No 9.

"Copy of Treasury Minute of the 13th August 1800. 13 August 1800
Extract — "But they" (the Lords of the Treasury) "submitt to
"his Grace, whether, by way of Experiment, it may be
"fit to carry it into effect on a more limited Scale,
"or whether, under all the Circumstances, it may be advisable
"at the present time, to relinquish the Plan altogether.
"In the latter Event, their Lordships shall feel
"it incumbent on them to make such Compensation to
"Mr Bentham, as the loss he has sustained in preparing
"for this Undertaking may appear to them to deserve."

N.B. It might from hence be supposed, that, , if
on the subject of compensation thus started, something had then recently been
said, to which I had been party: but nothing neither by me,
nothing on that subject had ever been no such claim had ever been
preferred
or meant to be preferred
and my aversion to the idea
having been stands declared
in sufficiently explicit
terms in my Examination beforementioned: and the sentiments therein declared have all along remained unchanged.




Identifier: | JB/122/216/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

216

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D16

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in