JB/122/262/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/262/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/262/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- header and marginal summary in pencil --> <p>6 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808 28<lb/><note>To Mallet</note><lb/>28</p> <p.<note>41 &#x2014; 24<lb/>In the case of the<lb/>judicatory, the<lb/>Judges, being neither anonymous<lb/>invisible, and irresponsible &#x2014; do<lb/>not take the Westminster<lb/>that Judges<lb/>give reasons.</note></p> <p>Two circumstances thus are, <add>In the <gap/> situation such as that in question</add> either of which would<lb/>in itself be sufficient to render <del><gap/></del> such a result<lb/>if not altogether assured, <add>certain</add> at any rate preponderantly <add>more probable that could be wished</add><lb/>probable.  The incognito under which they act, and<lb/>were supposing the incognito <add>veil of secrecy</add> removed: the exemption<lb/>from the obligation of giving reasons.</p>
<!-- header and marginal summary in pencil --> <p>6 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808 28<lb/><note>To Mallet</note><lb/>28</p> <p><note>41 &#x2014; 24<lb/>In the case of the<lb/>judicatory, the<lb/>Judges, being <gap/><lb/>anonymous<lb/>invisible, and irresponsible &#x2014; do<lb/>not like the Westminster<lb/>Hall Judges<lb/>give reasons.</note></p> <p>Two circumstances there are, <add>In the <gap/> situation such as that in question</add> either of which would<lb/>in itself be sufficient to render <del><gap/></del> such a result<lb/>if not altogether assured, <add>certain</add> at any rate preponderantly <add>more probable than could be wished</add><lb/>probable.  The incognito under which they act, and<lb/>were supposing the incognito <add>veil of secrecy</add> removed: the exemption<lb/>from the obligation of giving reasons.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 20:06, 9 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

6 Aug. 1808 28
To Mallet
28

41 — 24
In the case of the
judicatory, the
Judges, being
anonymous
invisible, and irresponsible — do
not like the Westminster
Hall Judges
give reasons.

Two circumstances there are, In the situation such as that in question either of which would
in itself be sufficient to render such a result
if not altogether assured, certain at any rate preponderantly more probable than could be wished
probable. The incognito under which they act, and
were supposing the incognito veil of secrecy removed: the exemption
from the obligation of giving reasons.




Identifier: | JB/122/262/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

41 or 24

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

262

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D28 / E28

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note 5 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in