JB/122/274/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/274/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/274/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil --> <p>11 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808<lb/><note>To Mallet</note><lb/>(4) <note>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Reforming Statute</note></p> <p><note>4<lb/>Sole means of prevention<lb/>thought of &#x2014;<lb/>transference of the<lb/>power from the<lb/>invisible Commissioners<lb/>to visible Judges></note></p> <p>Thereupon comes the reforming law: whereby a<lb/>matter of such delicacy as the <!-- brackets in pencil --> [admission <add>dispersing</add> of facts making<lb/>dispersed] of public money by the admission of facts<lb/>without proof was taken from a set of gentlemen<lb/>who sitting under the name of a <hi rend="underline">Board</hi> found in the<lb/>habits attached to that denomination all possible facility<lb/>towards the <del><gap/></del> lending a safe ear to the suggestion<lb/>of private convenience, to a set of learned persons who<lb/>sitting under the name of a Bench, did not find in<lb/>the <gap/> attached to that denomination any such facilities,<lb/>or at any rate in any thing like <add>an</add> equal degree.</p> <p><note>5<lb/>The supposed fact<lb/>of undue favour<lb/>is merely inferred<lb?>from the Statute,<lb/>as if from one<lb/>of Edward 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>, not<lb/>from direct evidence.</note></p> <p><del>The</del> Such in my view of the matter is the <add>true</add> history<lb/>of the <sic/>Stat</sic> <add>that Law.</add> But lest by <add><!-- in pencil --> my</add> meaning should be misconceived,<lb/><sic>permitt</sic> me, Sir, to protest <add>declare some more, and</add> in direct terms, that<lb/>for the supposed fact I have no evidence whatsoever<lb?>other than <del>what that</del> <add>that</add> which is composed of the practice of<lb/>the Board in the respect in question, coupled with the existing<lb/>law.  <del>To the possession of any <gap/> <gap/> I<lb/><add><gap/>,</add> have no more pretension than Judge</del>  In the laws <add>statutes</add> of<lb/>Edward the third may occasionally be said, the facts <add>on</add> which<lb/><add>those statutes found their causes</add> gave occasion to those law: in this statute <del><gap/></del> of<lb/>George the third I read the facts which gave occasion to<lb/>it, it is without any more assistance from anecdote or<lb/>rumour than if is had been a law of Edward<lb/>the third.</p>  
<!-- header and marginal summaries in pencil --> <p>11 <sic>Aug.</sic> 1808<lb/><note>To Mallet</note><lb/>(4) <note>V. Irresponsibility<lb/>Reforming Statute</note></p> <p><note>4<lb/>Sole means of prevention<lb/>thought of &#x2014;<lb/>transference of the<lb/>power from the<lb/>invisible Commissioners<lb/>to visible Judges</note></p> <p>Thereupon comes the reforming law: whereby a<lb/>matter of such delicacy as the <!-- brackets in pencil --> [admission <add>dispersing</add> of facts making<lb/>dispersed] of public money by the admission of facts<lb/>without proof was taken from a set of gentlemen<lb/>who sitting under the name of a <hi rend="underline">Board</hi> formed in the<lb/>habits attached to that denomination all possible facility<lb/>towards the <del><gap/></del> lending a safe ear to the suggestions<lb/>of private convenience, to a set of learned persons who<lb/>sitting under the name of a Bench, did not find in<lb/>the habits attached to that denomination any such facilities,<lb/>or at any rate in any thing like <add>an</add> equal degree.</p> <p><note>5<lb/>This supposed fact<lb/>of undue favour<lb/>is merely inferred<lb/>from the Statute,<lb/>as if from one<lb/>of Edward 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>, not<lb/>from direct evidence.</note></p> <p><del>This</del> Such in my view of the matter is the <add>true</add> history<lb/>of the <sic>Stat</sic> <add>that Law.</add> But lest by <add><!-- in pencil --> my</add> meaning should be misconceived,<lb/><sic>permitt</sic> me, Sir, to protest <add>declare once more, and</add> in direct terms, that<lb/>for the supposed fact I have no evidence whatsoever<lb/>other than <del>what that</del> <add>that</add> which is composed of the practice of<lb/>the Board in the respect in question, coupled with the existing<lb/>law.  <del>To the possession of any <gap/> <gap/> I<lb/><add>make,</add> have no more pretension than Judge</del>  In the laws <add>statutes</add> of<lb/>Edward the third may occasionally be read, the facts <add>on</add> which<lb/>gave occasion to those laws <add>those statutes found their causes</add>: <add>if</add> in this statute <del><gap/></del> of<lb/>George the third I read the facts which gave occasion to<lb/>it, it is without any more assistance from anecdote or<lb/>rumour than if <gap/> had been a law of Edward<lb/>the third.</p>  






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 15:51, 13 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

11 Aug. 1808
To Mallet
(4) V. Irresponsibility
Reforming Statute

4
Sole means of prevention
thought of —
transference of the
power from the
invisible Commissioners
to visible Judges

Thereupon comes the reforming law: whereby a
matter of such delicacy as the [admission dispersing of facts making
dispersed] of public money by the admission of facts
without proof was taken from a set of gentlemen
who sitting under the name of a Board formed in the
habits attached to that denomination all possible facility
towards the lending a safe ear to the suggestions
of private convenience, to a set of learned persons who
sitting under the name of a Bench, did not find in
the habits attached to that denomination any such facilities,
or at any rate in any thing like an equal degree.

5
This supposed fact
of undue favour
is merely inferred
from the Statute,
as if from one
of Edward 3d, not
from direct evidence.

This Such in my view of the matter is the true history
of the Stat that Law. But lest by my meaning should be misconceived,
permitt me, Sir, to protest declare once more, and in direct terms, that
for the supposed fact I have no evidence whatsoever
other than what that that which is composed of the practice of
the Board in the respect in question, coupled with the existing
law. To the possession of any I
make, have no more pretension than Judge
In the laws statutes of
Edward the third may occasionally be read, the facts on which
gave occasion to those laws those statutes found their causes: if in this statute of
George the third I read the facts which gave occasion to
it, it is without any more assistance from anecdote or
rumour than if had been a law of Edward
the third.




Identifier: | JB/122/274/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-08-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-5

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

274

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C4

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note 5 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in