JB/122/331/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/331/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/331/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- header in pencil --> <p>28 July 1808 + 12<lb/>Reasons against Vouchers</note></p> <p>The tendency here in question is <del>that</del> a tendency to act<lb/>in conformity to a supposed rule, putting an exclusion upon all<lb/>documents <del>not<d/el> other than what, as above are whimpering with the transaction of which they speak.</p> <p>Supposing any such rule to be established and <del><gap/></del><lb/>acted upon, the extent and enormity of the injustice <add><del>produced</del></add> <del>would</del><lb/><add>produced by it would</add> be such, that a slight hint of it may here be sufficient.<lb/><del>It.'s</del> <add>The</add> effect of it would be a law of <hi rend="underline">forfeiture</hi>,<lb/>inflicting on all accounts <del>that <gap/> penalty</del> <add>the grievous penalty so termed</add><lb/><add>and this on each occasion, all such</add> to the amount of <del><gap/></del> disbursements <del>to which</del> in respect<lb/>of which <del>they should</del> <add>it shall have happened to them to <sic>omitt</sic> to cause to be brought into existence</add> at the very time of the transactions<lb/>the species of voucher in question; or, supposing it<lb/>brought <del>to</del> into existence, <del>to have been</del> <add>to all such Accountants to whom it shall have happened to have been</add> by any cases<lb/><add><del>to</del> <hi rend="underline">deprived</hi> of it: and this, how justly and truly <add>soever</add> made<lb/>the disbursement may have been, and has complaint<lb/>and to every Court of Justice has satisfactory, soever<lb/>the other producible evidence, by which, if admitted,<lb/>the fact of the disbursement would be established.</p> <p>But, supposing the exclusionary rule in question<lb/>ever so just and proper in itself &#x2014; ever so conducive<lb/>to the ends of justice &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> or to speak more properly<lb/>capable of being rendered so by, <add>merely</add> communication to all<lb/>such persons whose fate it takes upon itself to dispose<lb/>of, yet <del>by</del> the mere want pf <add>such</add> communications <del>it</del> would<lb/><del>stands <gap/> with the most flagrant</del> <add>be sufficient to <gap/> it with the <gap/></add> <gap/>. <del>The</del><lb/><del><gap/></del>  With all the force and all the majority of an<lb/><foreign><hi rend="underline">ex parte facto</hi></foreign> <gap/>, it strikes upon the several<lb/>persons, <add>howsoever <gap/></add> whose <gap/> it is, for want of the requisite<lb/>communication, to fall victim to it, victims <del>subjected</del> <add>struck</add><lb/>by the inevitable forfeiture which it involves.</p>
<!-- header in pencil --> <p>28 July 1808 + 12<lb/><note>Reasons against Vouchers</note></p> <p>The tendency here in question is <del>that</del> a tendency to act<lb/>in conformity to a supposed rule, putting an exclusion upon all<lb/>documents <del>not</del> other than what, as above are contemporary with the transaction of which they speak.</p> <p>Supposing any such rule to be established and <del><gap/></del><lb/>acted upon, the extent and enormity of the injustice <add><del>produced</del></add> <del>would</del><lb/><add>produced by it would</add> be such, that a slight hint of it may here be sufficient.<lb/><del>It's</del> <add>The</add> effect of it would be a law of <hi rend="underline">forfeiture</hi>,<lb/>inflicting on all accountants <del>that enormous penalty</del> <add>the grievous penalty so termed</add><lb/><add>and this on each occasion, all such</add> to the amount of <del><gap/></del> disbursements <del>to which</del> in respect<lb/>of which <del>they should</del> <add>it shall have happened to them to <sic>omitt</sic> to cause to be brought into existence</add> at the very time of the transactions<lb/>the species of voucher in question; or, supposing it<lb/>brought <del>to</del> into existence, <del>to have been</del> <add>to all such Accountants to whom it shall have happened to have been</add> by any cause<lb/><add><del>to</del></add> <hi rend="underline">deprived</hi> of it: and this, how justly and truly <add>soever</add> made<lb/>the disbursement may have been, and how <sic>compleat</sic><lb/>and to every Court of Justice how satisfactory, soever<lb/>the other producible evidence, by which, if admitted,<lb/>the fact of the disbursement would be established.</p> <p>But, supposing the exclusionary rule in question<lb/>ever so just and proper in itself &#x2014; ever so conducive<lb/>to the ends of justice &#x2014; <del><gap/></del> or to speak more properly<lb/>capable of being rendered so by, <add>merely</add> communication to all<lb/>such persons whose fate it takes upon itself to dispose<lb/>of, yet <del>by</del> the mere want pf <add>such</add> communications <del>it</del> would<lb/><del>stands <gap/> with the most flagrant</del> <add>be sufficient to taint it with the rankest</add> injustice. <del>The</del><lb/><del><gap/></del>  With all the force and all the inequity of an<lb/><foreign><hi rend="underline">ex parte facto</hi></foreign> <unclear>line</unclear>, it strikes upon the several<lb/>persons, <add>howsoever numerous</add> whose destiny it is, for want of the requisite<lb/>communication, to fall victim to it, victims <del>subjected</del> <add>struck</add><lb/>by the inevitable forfeiture which it involves.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 13:11, 26 January 2021

'Click Here To Edit

28 July 1808 + 12
Reasons against Vouchers

The tendency here in question is that a tendency to act
in conformity to a supposed rule, putting an exclusion upon all
documents not other than what, as above are contemporary with the transaction of which they speak.

Supposing any such rule to be established and
acted upon, the extent and enormity of the injustice produced would
produced by it would be such, that a slight hint of it may here be sufficient.
It's The effect of it would be a law of forfeiture,
inflicting on all accountants that enormous penalty the grievous penalty so termed
and this on each occasion, all such to the amount of disbursements to which in respect
of which they should it shall have happened to them to omitt to cause to be brought into existence at the very time of the transactions
the species of voucher in question; or, supposing it
brought to into existence, to have been to all such Accountants to whom it shall have happened to have been by any cause
to deprived of it: and this, how justly and truly soever made
the disbursement may have been, and how compleat
and to every Court of Justice how satisfactory, soever
the other producible evidence, by which, if admitted,
the fact of the disbursement would be established.

But, supposing the exclusionary rule in question
ever so just and proper in itself — ever so conducive
to the ends of justice — or to speak more properly
capable of being rendered so by, merely communication to all
such persons whose fate it takes upon itself to dispose
of, yet by the mere want pf such communications it would
stands with the most flagrant be sufficient to taint it with the rankest injustice. The
With all the force and all the inequity of an
ex parte facto line, it strikes upon the several
persons, howsoever numerous whose destiny it is, for want of the requisite
communication, to fall victim to it, victims subjected struck
by the inevitable forfeiture which it involves.




Identifier: | JB/122/331/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

331

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D12

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in