JB/010/005/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/010/005/003: Difference between revisions

Susan S (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/010/005/003": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Susan S (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>6</head><lb/>made considerable progress in the drawing up a Penal Code <foreign><hi rend="underline">intermitus</hi></foreign><lb/>declasidly on the ground of my abovementioned work, with the additions<lb/>of some manuscripts <hi rend="superscript">of mine</hi> translated by Dumont. When after two years<lb/>spent in discussions, have been provisionally agreed upon was told<lb/>before me by Dumont <hi rend="superscript">their principal penner</hi>, with a request that I would furnish them with<lb/>matter for filling up the gaps which for want of such matter they had<lb/>been obliged to have. My answer was in substances that they <del><gap/></del><lb/>mind of patchwork etc seemed to me not well adapted to the end in<lb/>view. Some 30 or 40 years had elapsed since my writing of<lb/>those papers : that if life and health permitted I would gladly draw<lb/>up for their consideration an entire Code : <del>and the</del> <hi rend="superscript">which</hi> offer was accepted<lb/>with alacrity. I have already done something towards it.<lb/>But the misfortune is that I can not sit down to it regularly<lb/><sic>till</sic> I have fulfilled an engagement which takes up much of my<lb/>time than I had anticipated. It is that of drawing up under the<lb/>name of a Bill for Parliamentary Reform the essential parts of<lb/>a Constitutional Code for this country. I engaged in it with<lb/><gap/> solicitation by letter from Sir Francis Burdet who in<lb/>the House of Commons at the opening of the new Parliament is<lb/>to <del>make</del> endeavour at the introduction of it by a motion<lb/>the rejection of which with scarce any body to support it is<lb/>matter of certainty. The plain truth being that the Government<lb/>of this country <del>is</del> has by the system of corruption been rendered a<lb/>mere system of <unclear>dispoture</unclear>, and that with <del><gap/></del> nothing but more<lb/>form for a disguise to it, and <hi rend="superscript">for a lack to it</hi> nothing but Jury trial, and the<lb/>liberty of speech and writing both liberties exercised in the teeth <add>of this Code</add>,<lb/>of law and the custom of them at all times precarious. In<lb/>substance and even in terms the text is already pretty well<lb/>settled. In quired so the titles of the sections about I did at consists<lb/>only in the expention <hi rend="superscript">to a given</hi> of the leading principles and  <del><gap/></del> the particular<lb/>reason for the several provisions : articles which under the<lb/>aggregate name of the <hi rend="underline">Rationali</hi><foreign></foreign> I stand in every occasion, newgaded<lb/>to add to the text. For the <gap/> of its being found of use in <add>the</add><pb/><note>the occasion of <del>y</del> the Code which your Assembly will have to frame, I will use my endeavours to transmit the whole to you as soon as printed, and possibly in the meantime this or that part. </note>                                               
<head>6</head><lb/>made considerable progress in the drawing up a Penal Code <foreign><hi rend="underline">intermitus</hi></foreign><lb/>declasidly on the ground of my abovementioned work, with the additions<lb/>of some manuscripts <hi rend="superscript">of mine</hi> translated by Dumont. When after two years<lb/>spent in discussions, have been provisionally agreed upon was laid<lb/>before me by Dumont, <hi rend="superscript">their principal penner</hi>, with a request that I would furnish them with<lb/>matter for filling up the gaps which for want of such matter they had<lb/>been obliged to  
leave. My answer was in substance that this <del>kind</del><lb/>kind of patchwork <del>etc</del> seemed to me not well adapted to the end in<lb/>view. Some 30 or 40 years had elapsed since my writing of<lb/>those papers: that if life and health permitted I would gladly draw<lb/>up for their consideration an entire Code: <del>and the</del> <hi rend="superscript">which</hi> offer was accepted<lb/>with alacrity. I have already done something towards it.<lb/>But the misfortune is that I can not sit down to it regularly<lb/><sic>till</sic> I have fulfilled an engagement which takes up much of my<lb/>time than I had anticipated. It is that of drawing up under the<lb/>name of a Bill for Parliamentary Reform the essential parts of<lb/>a Constitutional Code for this country. I engaged in it with<lb/><gap/> solicitation by letter from Sir Francis Burdet who in<lb/>the House of Commons at the opening of the new Parliament is<lb/>to <del>make</del> <sic>endeavour</sic> at the introduction of it by a motion<lb/>the rejection of which with scarce any body to support it is<lb/>matter of certainty. The plain truth being that the Government<lb/>of this country <del>is</del> has by the system of corruption been rendered a<lb/>mere system of despotism, and that with <del><gap/></del> nothing but more<lb/>form for a disguise to it, and <hi rend="superscript">for a lack to it</hi> nothing but mere<lb/>form for a disguise to it, and <hi rend="superscript">for a check to it</hi> nothing but Jury trial, and the<lb/>liberty of speech and writing both liberties exercised in the teeth <add>of this Code</add>,<lb/>of law and the existence of them at all times precarious. In<lb/>substance and even in forms the text is already pretty well<lb/>settled <gap/> or the titles of the sections: a lot I elect at consists<lb/>only in the <sic>expention</sic> <unclear>extension?</unclear> <hi rend="superscript">to be given</hi> of the <del><gap/></del>leading principles and the particular<lb/>reason for the several <unclear>provisions</unclear>: articles which under the<lb/>aggregate name of the <hi rend="underline">Rationali</hi><foreign></foreign> I'll stand on every occasion, engaged<lb/>to add to the text. For the <unclear>charm</unclear> of its being found of use in <add>the</add><pb/><note>the occasion of <del>y</del> the Code which your Assembly will have to frame, I will use any <sic>endeavour</sic> to <sic>transmitt</sic> the whole to you as soon as printed, and possibly in the meantime <del>that</del> or that part.</note>                                               


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 17:26, 30 January 2021

Click Here To Edit

6
made considerable progress in the drawing up a Penal Code intermitus
declasidly on the ground of my abovementioned work, with the additions
of some manuscripts of mine translated by Dumont. When after two years
spent in discussions, have been provisionally agreed upon was laid
before me by Dumont, their principal penner, with a request that I would furnish them with
matter for filling up the gaps which for want of such matter they had
been obliged to leave. My answer was in substance that this kind
kind of patchwork etc seemed to me not well adapted to the end in
view. Some 30 or 40 years had elapsed since my writing of
those papers: that if life and health permitted I would gladly draw
up for their consideration an entire Code: and the which offer was accepted
with alacrity. I have already done something towards it.
But the misfortune is that I can not sit down to it regularly
till I have fulfilled an engagement which takes up much of my
time than I had anticipated. It is that of drawing up under the
name of a Bill for Parliamentary Reform the essential parts of
a Constitutional Code for this country. I engaged in it with
solicitation by letter from Sir Francis Burdet who in
the House of Commons at the opening of the new Parliament is
to make endeavour at the introduction of it by a motion
the rejection of which with scarce any body to support it is
matter of certainty. The plain truth being that the Government
of this country is has by the system of corruption been rendered a
mere system of despotism, and that with nothing but more
form for a disguise to it, and for a lack to it nothing but mere
form for a disguise to it, and for a check to it nothing but Jury trial, and the
liberty of speech and writing both liberties exercised in the teeth of this Code,
of law and the existence of them at all times precarious. In
substance and even in forms the text is already pretty well
settled or the titles of the sections: a lot I elect at consists
only in the expention extension? to be given of the leading principles and the particular
reason for the several provisions: articles which under the
aggregate name of the Rationali I'll stand on every occasion, engaged
to add to the text. For the charm of its being found of use in the
---page break---
the occasion of y the Code which your Assembly will have to frame, I will use any endeavour to transmitt the whole to you as soon as printed, and possibly in the meantime that or that part.



Identifier: | JB/010/005/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 10.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

010

Main Headings

Folio number

005

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 f5 / c6 f6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::i&m [fleur de lys] 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

see note to letter 2719, vol. 10

ID Number

3441

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in