JB/052/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/021/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
<note>Ends</note>
<note>Ends</note>


<p>order any of the inconveniences corresponding<lb/>to the ends of the first order in regard to the<lb/>business of procedure.<lb/></p><p>First.  So far as the delay continues so far<lb/>the main positive ultimate end of procedure<lb/> remainsunaccomplished.<lb/></p> <p>2<hi rend="superscript">ly</hi>. From delay again in certain cases may<lb/>arise a result contrary to the negative ultimate<lb/>end of procedure &#x2014; in other words from delay may<lb/>arise the conviction &amp; thence the punishment &amp;c<lb/>of the non-guilty &#x2014; as for example by the <gap/><lb/>of evidence necessary tot he proof of innocence.<lb/></p><p>3<hi rend="superscript">ly</hi>. From delay may arise <del>forn</del> forensic<lb/>vexation in any of its already enumerated shapes.<lb/></p><p>Second end of procedure among the ends of the <lb/>second order &#x2014; avoidance of precipitation.<lb/></p><note>14 <lb/>III. Mischief of the <lb/>3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> order Precipatation<lb/>By preciptation no <lb/>certain mischief of cases<lb/>of the two first orders <lb/>is produced. only <lb/>a chance of one or<lb/> more of the mischiefs <lb/>of the first orders as <lb/>the case may be <lb/>In practibus <lb/>1. Non punitive, with<lb/> non satisfactio<lb/> or<lb/> 2. Punitive undue<lb/> with satisfaction undue <lb/>In non punitive 3. <add>Non</add> Collation where <del>unde</del> <add>due</add><lb/>4. <del>non</del> Collation, where<lb/> undue<lb/></note><del>Precippitation</del> Precipitation may be ranked<lb/><del>among the ends</del> <add>as an end</add> of the second order for the same<lb/>reasons that apply to the case of delay.  But<lb/>the mass of inconvenience of which <del>is</del> it is <lb/>liable to be productive is upon the whole<lb/><unclear>seen</unclear> less considerable or at lest lest diversified.<lb/>In the case of dealy there is a certain inconvenience<lb/>as  long as it lasts viz the inconvenience already<lb/>mentioned in every case <del>so</del> delay so long as it<lb/> lasts is  denier of justice in the case of<lb/>precipitation there is no inconvenience but <lb/>what in the first instance is <gap/> out<lb/>the <del>inconv</del> inconvenience appertaining to<lb/>precipitation is the chance of some of of <lb/>the inconveniences to which <gap/><lb/>the precipitation wich gives birth then<lb/>are no other then the disaccomplishments<lb/>
<note>II. Delay<lb/>III Precipitation<lb/>&#x2014; 3. Vexation; as above<lb/></note><p>order any of the inconveniences corresponding<lb/>to the ends of the first order in regard to the<lb/>business of procedure.<lb/></p><p>First.  So far as the delay continues so far<lb/>the main positive ultimate end of procedure<lb/> remains unaccomplished.<lb/></p> <p>2<hi rend="superscript">ly</hi>. From delay again in certain cases may<lb/>arise a result contrary to the negative ultimate<lb/>end of procedure &#x2014; in other words from delay may<lb/>arise the conviction &amp; thence the punishment &amp;c<lb/>of the non-guilty &#x2014; as for example by the deprivation<lb/>of evidence necessary to the proof of innocence.<lb/></p><p>3<hi rend="superscript">ly</hi>. From delay may arise <del>forn</del> forensic<lb/>vexation in any of its already enumerated shapes.<lb/></p><p>Second end of procedure among the ends of the <lb/>second order &#x2014; avoidance of precipitation.<lb/></p><note>14 <lb/>III. Mischief of the <lb/>3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> order Precipitation<lb/>By precipitation no <lb/>certain mischief of either<lb/>of the two first orders <lb/>is produced &#x2014; only <lb/>a chance of one or<lb/>other of the mischiefs <lb/>of the first orders as <lb/>the case may be viz.<lb/>In practibus <lb/>1. Non punitive, with<lb/> non satisfactio<lb/> or<lb/> 2. Punitive undue<lb/> with satisfaction undue <lb/>In non punitive 3. <add>Non</add> Collation where <del>unde</del> <add>due</add><lb/>4. <del>Non</del> Collation, where<lb/> undue<lb/></note><p><del>Precipitation</del> Precipitation may be ranked<lb/><del>among the ends</del> <add>as an end</add> of the second order for the same<lb/>reasons that apply to the case of delay.  But<lb/>the mass of inconvenience of which <del>is</del> it is <lb/>liable to be productive is upon the whole<lb/>even less considerable or at least less diversified.<lb/>In the case of delay there is a certain inconvenience<lb/>as  long as it lasts viz the inconvenience already<lb/>mentioned in every case <del>so</del> delay so long as it<lb/> lasts is  denier of justice in the case of<lb/>precipitation there is no inconvenience but <lb/>what in the first instance is <gap/> out<lb/>the <del>inconv</del> inconvenience appertaining to<lb/>precipitation is the chance of some one of <lb/>the inconveniences to which it may happen<lb/>the precipitation shall give birth. These<lb/>are no other then the disaccomplishments<lb/></p>





Revision as of 22:04, 1 February 2021

Click Here To Edit

13 Novr 1802

8

Dumont Procedure.

Ends

II. Delay
III Precipitation
— 3. Vexation; as above

order any of the inconveniences corresponding
to the ends of the first order in regard to the
business of procedure.

First. So far as the delay continues so far
the main positive ultimate end of procedure
remains unaccomplished.

2ly. From delay again in certain cases may
arise a result contrary to the negative ultimate
end of procedure — in other words from delay may
arise the conviction & thence the punishment &c
of the non-guilty — as for example by the deprivation
of evidence necessary to the proof of innocence.

3ly. From delay may arise forn forensic
vexation in any of its already enumerated shapes.

Second end of procedure among the ends of the
second order — avoidance of precipitation.

14
III. Mischief of the
3d order Precipitation
By precipitation no
certain mischief of either
of the two first orders
is produced — only
a chance of one or
other of the mischiefs
of the first orders as
the case may be viz.
In practibus
1. Non punitive, with
non satisfactio
or
2. Punitive undue
with satisfaction undue
In non punitive 3. Non Collation where unde due
4. Non Collation, where
undue

Precipitation Precipitation may be ranked
among the ends as an end of the second order for the same
reasons that apply to the case of delay. But
the mass of inconvenience of which is it is
liable to be productive is upon the whole
even less considerable or at least less diversified.
In the case of delay there is a certain inconvenience
as long as it lasts viz the inconvenience already
mentioned in every case so delay so long as it
lasts is denier of justice in the case of
precipitation there is no inconvenience but
what in the first instance is out
the inconv inconvenience appertaining to
precipitation is the chance of some one of
the inconveniences to which it may happen
the precipitation shall give birth. These
are no other then the disaccomplishments
























Identifier: | JB/052/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1802-11-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

14

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

dumont procedure

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16694

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in