JB/052/024/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/024/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>13 Novr<hi rend="superscript"></hi> 1802</note>
 
<note>11</note>
 
<head>Dumont Procedure</head>
 
<note>Ends</note>
 
<p>but especially the alarm of which it is apt<lb/>to be productive.</p>
 
<note>Ends <lb/>Precipitation<lb/> 17<lb/>&#x2014; 2. for the forthcoming <lb/>of a witness<lb/> In which case however <lb/>there is no actual <lb/>inconvenience produced <lb/>if the witness comes<lb/></note><p>Thus again if the time allowed by the Judge<lb/>for the appearance of a witness is but three<lb/>days and the time which a person whose<lb/>opinion is supposed to be the standard would<lb/>fix upon as necessary for the purpose is <lb/>four days the Jugge would of course in the<lb/>opinion of such person stand chargeable<lb/>with precipitation if then the witness accordingly<lb/>for want of sufficient time fails of making<lb/>his appearance within the time in question<lb/>and for want of his appearance an unjust<lb/>decision is given by the Judge a decision contrary<lb/>to one or other of the two ultimate<lb/>ends of Justice, in such case the contingent<lb/>inconvenience <gap/> to the supposed<lb/>precipitation is concerned with a real<lb/>one: but if notwithstanding the supposed<lb/>precipitation the witness does make his<lb/>appearance within the time and this without<lb/>any forensic vexation produced  on the part<lb/>of this or any body else (for example without<lb/>injury to his health or to the value of his time<lb/>or increase of expense &amp;c) in such case the<lb/>supposed precipitation turns out to be<lb/>no real precipitation or at least not to<lb/>be productive of any ultimate inconvenience<lb/>nor of any other inconvenience of any prejudice<lb/>to any of the ends of justice.  On the<lb/>contrary the conseuqence &amp; only consequence<lb/>of it consists in &#x2014;real  &amp; positive convenience<lb/>since a portion of delay in the amount of a day is<lb/>saved.<lb/></p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 23:05, 1 February 2021

Click Here To Edit

13 Novr 1802

11

Dumont Procedure

Ends

but especially the alarm of which it is apt
to be productive.

Ends
Precipitation
17
— 2. for the forthcoming
of a witness
In which case however
there is no actual
inconvenience produced
if the witness comes

Thus again if the time allowed by the Judge
for the appearance of a witness is but three
days and the time which a person whose
opinion is supposed to be the standard would
fix upon as necessary for the purpose is
four days the Jugge would of course in the
opinion of such person stand chargeable
with precipitation if then the witness accordingly
for want of sufficient time fails of making
his appearance within the time in question
and for want of his appearance an unjust
decision is given by the Judge a decision contrary
to one or other of the two ultimate
ends of Justice, in such case the contingent
inconvenience to the supposed
precipitation is concerned with a real
one: but if notwithstanding the supposed
precipitation the witness does make his
appearance within the time and this without
any forensic vexation produced on the part
of this or any body else (for example without
injury to his health or to the value of his time
or increase of expense &c) in such case the
supposed precipitation turns out to be
no real precipitation or at least not to
be productive of any ultimate inconvenience
nor of any other inconvenience of any prejudice
to any of the ends of justice. On the
contrary the conseuqence & only consequence
of it consists in —real & positive convenience
since a portion of delay in the amount of a day is
saved.
























Identifier: | JB/052/024/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1802-11-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

17

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

024

Info in main headings field

dumont procedure

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d11

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

16697

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in