JB/052/023/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/023/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
<note>Ends</note>
<note>Ends</note>


<note>Precipitatio<lb/>16<lb/>Examples.<lb/>1. for forming a<lb/> decision<lb/>Either case howere<lb/>there is no actual<lb/>inconvenience produced<lb/>is the decidion appears<lb/>to be right<lb/></note><p>Precipitation is considered as taking place<lb/>when in any part any thing is supposed to be<lb/>struck off or defalcad from this supposed<lb/>necessary length of time &#x2014; Thus if a cause be<lb/>supposed to be of this importants that after<lb/>the hearing of all the briefs a less time<lb/>than a week cannot it be supposed be<lb/>employed in the consideration of them &amp; the<lb/>time employed by the Judge in the consideration<lb/>of them is no more than a single day<lb/>in such case the Judge must by the impropriety<lb/>he deemed chargeable with precipitation  If then<lb/>in consequence of such supposed precipitation<lb/>the judgment actually given by the Judge is<lb/>repubnant on one or other of the ultimate<lb/>ends of justice in the case the mischief<lb/>corresponds to any ultimate end to<lb/>actually produced.  But in the <del>other</del> <add>opposite</add> case i:e:<lb/>if the decision of the Judge be conformable to<lb/>the ultimate ends of justice no mischief at<lb/>all is produced by precipitation the contingency<lb/>of it is reduced to act on the contrary so far<lb/>from being productive of inconvenience the<lb/>supposed precipitation is productive of<lb/>advantage upon the whole since by virtue<lb/>of it no such time <gap/><lb/>as corresponds<lb/>to the delay thus saved is saved.<lb/>
<note>Precipitation<lb/>16<lb/>Examples.<lb/>1. for forming a<lb/> decision<lb/>Either case however<lb/>there is no actual<lb/>inconvenience produced<lb/>if the decision appears<lb/>to be right<lb/></note><p>Precipitation is considered as taking place<lb/>when in any part any thing is supposed to be<lb/>struck off or <gap/> from this supposed<lb/>necessary length of time &#x2014; Thus if a cause be<lb/>supposed to be of thus importance that after<lb/>the hearing of all the proofs a less time<lb/>than a week cannot it is supposed be<lb/>sufficient on the part of the Judge to be<lb/>employed in the consideration of them &amp; the<lb/>time employed by the Judge in the consideration<lb/>of them is no more than a single day<lb/>in such case the Judge must by the inferiority<lb/>he deemed chargeable with precipitation  If then<lb/>in consequence of such supposed precipitation<lb/>the judgment actually given by the Judge is<lb/>repugnant on one or other of the ultimate<lb/>ends of justice in this case the mischief<lb/>correspondent to such ultimate end is<lb/>actually produced.  But in the <del>other</del> <add>opposite</add> case i:e:<lb/>if the decision of the Judge be conformable to<lb/>the ultimate ends of justice no mischief at<lb/>all is produced by precipitation the contingency<lb/> is now reduced to <gap/> on the contrary so far<lb/>from being productive of inconvenience the<lb/>supposed precipitation is productive of<lb/>advantage upon the whole since by virtue<lb/>of it as much time <gap/><lb/>as corresponds<lb/>to the delay thus saved is saved.<lb/>
</p><p>Thus much as to what concern the interests <lb/>of the individual parties to the cause<lb/>and the correspondent mischief and advantages<lb/>of the first order the principal mischief <gap/><lb/>is of the second order viz the alarm &amp; danger<lb/></p>
</p><p>Thus much as to what concerns the interests <lb/>of the <del><add>ind</add> parties</del> individual parties to the cause<lb/>and the correspondent mischiefs and advantages<lb/>of the first order the principal mischief liable to<lb/>is of the second order viz the alarm &amp; danger<lb/></p>





Revision as of 19:38, 3 February 2021

Click Here To Edit

13 Novr 1802.

10

Dumont Procedure

Ends

Precipitation
16
Examples.
1. for forming a
decision
Either case however
there is no actual
inconvenience produced
if the decision appears
to be right

Precipitation is considered as taking place
when in any part any thing is supposed to be
struck off or from this supposed
necessary length of time — Thus if a cause be
supposed to be of thus importance that after
the hearing of all the proofs a less time
than a week cannot it is supposed be
sufficient on the part of the Judge to be
employed in the consideration of them & the
time employed by the Judge in the consideration
of them is no more than a single day
in such case the Judge must by the inferiority
he deemed chargeable with precipitation If then
in consequence of such supposed precipitation
the judgment actually given by the Judge is
repugnant on one or other of the ultimate
ends of justice in this case the mischief
correspondent to such ultimate end is
actually produced. But in the other opposite case i:e:
if the decision of the Judge be conformable to
the ultimate ends of justice no mischief at
all is produced by precipitation the contingency
is now reduced to on the contrary so far
from being productive of inconvenience the
supposed precipitation is productive of
advantage upon the whole since by virtue
of it as much time
as corresponds
to the delay thus saved is saved.

Thus much as to what concerns the interests
of the ind parties individual parties to the cause
and the correspondent mischiefs and advantages
of the first order the principal mischief liable to
is of the second order viz the alarm & danger



























Identifier: | JB/052/023/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1802-11-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

16

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

023

Info in main headings field

dumont procedure

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d10

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

16696

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in