JB/010/011/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/010/011/001: Difference between revisions

Susan S (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Susan S (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Pencil note 1820 Feb</head><lb/>To Gorssenhuf Baffello<lb/>Another consideration, though if a personal knew every<lb/>even in your past not to altogether without claim to notice.<lb/>Personal safety, <del>if <gap/></del> <hi rend="superscript">so far as</hi> in these terms it is to be had is a considirntion<lb/>at no time to be neglected. Addressed <del>to me</del> <hi rend="superscript">as it is</hi> may not your<lb/>letter be a libel; my answer to it another libel; and <del><gap/></del><lb/>taken together the two letters <hi rend="superscript">may they not constitute</hi> a conspiracy to bring <del>the gov</del> his<lb/>Majestys Government
<head>Pencil note 1820 Feb</head><lb/>To Gorssenhuf Baffello<lb/>Another consideration, though if a personal knew every<lb/>even in your past not to altogether without claim to notice.<lb/>Personal safety, <del>if <gap/></del> <hi rend="superscript">so far as</hi> in these terms it is to be had or a consideration<lb/>at no time to be neglected. Addressed <del>to me</del> <hi rend="superscript">as it is</hi> may not your<lb/>letter be a libel? my answer to it another libel? and <del><gap/></del><lb/>taken together the two letters <hi rend="superscript">may they not constitute</hi> a conspiracy to bring <del>the gov</del> his<lb/>Majestys Government into hatred and contempt? A libel what<lb/>is it but a discourse that excites the displeasure of him who has<lb/>the <gap/> of the Attorney General at his command? A conspiracy<lb/><gap/> is it but <gap/><lb/><gap/><lb/><gap/><lb/><gap/>by which the displeasure of the same<lb/><gap/> person has been excited? The wrong man may be<lb/>that <del>you may obtain a view</del> the door of this same <hi rend="superscript">place</hi> un<lb/>of scent     





Revision as of 20:51, 3 February 2021

Click Here To Edit

Pencil note 1820 Feb
To Gorssenhuf Baffello
Another consideration, though if a personal knew every
even in your past not to altogether without claim to notice.
Personal safety, if so far as in these terms it is to be had or a consideration
at no time to be neglected. Addressed to me as it is may not your
letter be a libel? my answer to it another libel? and
taken together the two letters may they not constitute a conspiracy to bring the gov his
Majestys Government into hatred and contempt? A libel what
is it but a discourse that excites the displeasure of him who has
the of the Attorney General at his command? A conspiracy
is it but


by which the displeasure of the same
person has been excited? The wrong man may be
that you may obtain a view the door of this same place un
of scent




Identifier: | JB/010/011/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 10.

Date_1

1820-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

010

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

011

Info in main headings field

[[info_in_main_headings_field::to griffinhoof[sic] bastille]]

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::i&m [fleur-de-lys] 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

letter 2589, vol. 9

ID Number

3447

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in