JB/081/197/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:35, 10 February 2021

1829. April
Petitions Supplement
S.2 Elucidation

-than that which has thus been described. Judge
A (suppose) has been removed: Judge A in whose
presence the testimony has in the oral mode been
elicited: and with it the natural signs with which
the utterance of it was accompanied, of which natural
signs an account has been written down by,
or under the care of the Registrar: and here, supposing
the importance of the case sufficient to pay
for the trouble, confirmation and, in
writing might be elicited from the surrounding
audience.

The place of it is now taken by Judge
B. In what way his situation is that of disadvantage,
as compared with that of the Judge A, has been
above stated. But how great soever the disadvantage
may be in the case of this second Judge, it will
not be greater in the case of a third Judge: nor, in
a word, in the case of the last of any number of
successive Judges -

Identifier: \| JB/081/197/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-04	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	197	Info in main headings field	petition
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c4
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks	street & co
Marginals		Paper Producer	antonio alcala galiano
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25984
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<head>1829. April<lb/>
+Petitions</head>
+<note>Supplement<lb/>
+S.2 Elucidation</note>
+<p>-than that which has thus been described. Judge<lb/>
+A (suppose) has been removed: Judge A in whose<lb/>
+presence the testimony has in the oral mode been<lb/>
+elicited: and with it the natural signs with which<lb/>
+the utterance of it was accompanied, of which natural<lb/>
+signs an account has been written down by,<lb/>
+or under the care of the Registrar: and here, supposing<lb/>
+the importance of the case sufficient to pay<lb/>
+for the trouble, confirmation and, in<lb/>
+writing might be elicited from the surrounding<lb/>
+audience.</p>
+<p>The place of it is now taken by Judge<lb/>
+B. In what way his situation is that of disadvantage,<lb/>
+as compared with that of <del>the</del> Judge A, has been<lb/>
+above stated. But how great soever the disadvantage<lb/>
+may be in the case of this <hi rend="underline">second</hi> Judge, it will<lb/>
+not be greater in the case of a <hi rend="underline">third</hi> Judge: nor, in<lb/>
+a word, in the case of the last of any number of<lb/>
+successive Judges -</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Views

JB/081/197/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:35, 10 February 2021

Navigation

Search