JB/078/011/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/078/011/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/078/011/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<p>1826. Oct.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 28.</p>
<p>1826. Oct.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 28.</p>
<p>Review of Humphreys.</p>
<p>Review of Humphreys.</p>
H's
<p><add>H's</add> Preliminary Enactment.</p>
Preliminary Enactment
<p>1.</p>
1
<p>of H's preliminary <lb/>
of H's preliminary enactments.  Necessity of another he will see.
enactments.</p>  


J.B's speciment, if any, is not given as perfected.
<p>Necessity of another he <lb/>
will see.</p>


2. Per Art 1. Abolition absolute: exceptions none. 2.  Immediate witness "henceforth". 3. By Art 2. and 3. COmmissioners for producing the effects produced already by Art. 1 Now,
<p>J.B's specimen, if <lb/>
not till after returns made by them and time for consideration is the King to six the times from which the abolition shall have place. 4. J.B.'s mode of warding.  By an all-comprehensive designation, subject matter of abolition designated.  Of exceptions, if any, notice at commencement of the general rule. 5. By H.the description of it varies four time in the four first articles 6. Incidents confusion by abolishing them first in the conjunction with the principal then separately.  
any, is not given as <lb/>
perfected.</p>


  H.
<p>2.</p>
Preliminary Enactment.
<p>Per Art 1. Abolition absolute: <lb/>
exceptions <lb/>
none.</p>
<p>2.  Immediate witness <lb/>
"<hi rend="underline">henceforth</hi>".</p>
<p>3.</p>
<p>By Art 2. and 3. Commissioners <lb/>
for producing <lb/>
the effects produced <lb/>
already by Art. 1<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Now</hi>, not till after <lb/>
returns made by them <lb/>
and time for consideration <lb/>
is the King <lb/>
to fix the times from <lb/>
which the abolition <lb/>
shall have place.</p>
<p>4.</p>
<p>J.B.'s mode of warding.  <lb/>
By an all-comprehensive <lb/>
designation, <lb/>
subject matter of abolition <lb/>
designated.  <lb/>
Of exceptions, if any, <lb/>
notice at commencement <lb/>
of the general <lb/>
rule.</p>
<p>5.</p>
<p>By H.<add>the</add> description <lb/>
of it varies four times <lb/>
in the four first articles.</p>
<p>6.</p>
<p>Incidents confusion <lb/>
by abolishing them <lb/>
first in the conjunction <lb/>
with the principal <lb/>
then separately.</p><pb/>


7
<p><add>H.</add> Preliminary Enactment.</p>
Art 11 mentions privileges.  To which of the subject matters of abolition is this an incident? 8. Incidents of H. has from Blackstone J.B. would have given 1. LIst of the several 2. Under each, list of it's indidents: distinguishing those abolished, and those, if any, preserved. 9. Art 4. By "provided" (the customary word,) exception is made.  Certain copyholds shall not be operated upon by the preceding enactment.  But there are three. 100 Art 4. Tenement for the first times If any where needed before.  This the second in the scale of extensiveness. DAvids Tenements and thereditaments. For mention of here ditaments, demand equal: what a copyhold on Tenement gives to Land, gives hereditaments yet of hereditament no mention made. 11 Art. 4 While such tenures subsist - Quere meaning and uses
 
<p>7.</p>
<p>Art 4. mentions <hi rend="underline">privileges</hi><lb/>
To which of the <lb/>
subject matters of abolition <lb/>
is this an <hi rend="underline">incident</hi>?</p>
<p>8.</p>
<p>Incidents of <lb/>
H. has from Blackstone <lb/>
J.B. would have given.</p>
<p>1. List of the several</p>
<p>2. Under each, list of it's <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">incidents</hi>: <lb/>
distinguishing those abolished, <lb/>
and those, if any, <lb/>
preserved.</p>
<p>9.</p>
<p>Art 4. By "provided",<lb/>
(the customary word,) <lb/>
exception is made.  <lb/>
Certain copyholds shall <lb/>
not be operated <hi rend="underline">upon</hi> <lb/>
by <hi rend="underline">the</hi> preceding enactment.  <lb/>
But there are <hi rend="underline">three</hi>.</p>
<p>10.</p>
<p>Art 4. <hi rend="underline">Tenement</hi> for the <lb/>
first times If any where <lb/>
needed before.</p>  
<p>This the second <lb/>
in the scale of extensiveness. <lb/>
Lands Tenements <lb/>
and Hereditaments. <lb/>
For mention of hereditaments, <lb/>
demand equal: <lb/>
what a copyhold on Tenement <lb/>
gives to Land, <lb/>
gives hereditaments <lb/>
yet of hereditament <lb/>
no mention made.</p>
<p>11.</p>
<p>Art. 4 <hi rend="underline">While such tenures</hi> <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">subsist</hi> - <lb/>
Quere meaning and <lb/>
uses</p><pb/>
 
<p><add>H's</add> Preliminary Enactment.</p>
<p>12.</p>
<p>Art 4. "Beneficial <del>terms</del>"<lb/>
owner" - A personage<lb/>
indispensable in<lb/>
speaking of <hi rend="underline">trusts</hi><lb/>
yet, in page 184.281.<lb/>
not mentioned, tho'<lb/>
provided for.</p>
<p>Per JB. he is called<lb/>
intended benefitee.<lb/>
As to the three persons,<lb/>
see Agenda.</p><pb/>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 09:38, 4 March 2021

Click Here To Edit

1826. Oct.r 28.

Review of Humphreys.

H's Preliminary Enactment.

1.

of H's preliminary
enactments.

Necessity of another he
will see.

J.B's specimen, if
any, is not given as
perfected.

2.

Per Art 1. Abolition absolute:
exceptions
none.

2. Immediate witness
"henceforth".

3.

By Art 2. and 3. Commissioners
for producing
the effects produced
already by Art. 1
Now, not till after
returns made by them
and time for consideration
is the King
to fix the times from
which the abolition
shall have place.

4.

J.B.'s mode of warding.
By an all-comprehensive
designation,
subject matter of abolition
designated.
Of exceptions, if any,
notice at commencement
of the general
rule.

5.

By H.the description
of it varies four times
in the four first articles.

6.

Incidents confusion
by abolishing them
first in the conjunction
with the principal
then separately.


---page break---

H. Preliminary Enactment.

7.

Art 4. mentions privileges.
To which of the
subject matters of abolition
is this an incident?

8.

Incidents of
H. has from Blackstone
J.B. would have given.

1. List of the several

2. Under each, list of it's
incidents:
distinguishing those abolished,
and those, if any,
preserved.

9.

Art 4. By "provided",
(the customary word,)
exception is made.
Certain copyholds shall
not be operated upon
by the preceding enactment.
But there are three.

10.

Art 4. Tenement for the
first times If any where
needed before.

This the second
in the scale of extensiveness.
Lands Tenements
and Hereditaments.
For mention of hereditaments,
demand equal:
what a copyhold on Tenement
gives to Land,
gives hereditaments
yet of hereditament
no mention made.

11.

Art. 4 While such tenures
subsist -
Quere meaning and
uses


---page break---

H's Preliminary Enactment.

12.

Art 4. "Beneficial terms"
owner" - A personage
indispensable in
speaking of trusts
yet, in page 184.281.
not mentioned, tho'
provided for.

Per JB. he is called
intended benefitee.
As to the three persons,
see Agenda.


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/078/011/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-10-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-12

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

011

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

H's Preliminary Enactment

Category

Marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

25102

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in