JB/122/415/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/415/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/122/415/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<!-- header in pencil -->
<!-- header in pencil -->


<p>10 May 1813 + 20<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>III. Contract<lb/>&sect;.7. Other Rates</note><lb/>(3) 3 <note>Observations<?note></p> <p>In relation to the three last of <add>viz. the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>, 5<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> &amp; 6<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></add> of these same Rates<lb/><del>the fo</del> observations to <del>th</del> <add>some such effect in the</add> following <del>effect</del> may perhaps<lb/>present themselves</p> <p><add>IV. As to the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> <add>rate</add> viz. Sir George Paul's and <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Baker's Rate</add></p> <p>V. <hi rend="underline">Against the Claimant</hi>.<lb/>1.  In regard to the Opinion of <hi rend="underline">Sir George Paul</hi> <del>that</del> it<lb/>is a naked Opinion, unsupported by an Accounts:<lb/><add>although the <del>Pris</del> only Prison, of and from the accounts of which that gentleman could have been speaking<lb/>was then, as for many years it had been, under his management.</add></p> <p><hi rend="underline">Answer.</hi>  It is <del>one</del> of the two only documents,<lb/>on the ground of which, so far as concerns economy, the<lb/>Penitentiary Committee, by which <add>in the setting aside the Claimants plan</add> on <del>the</del> <add>that</add> Grounds <del>that</del> as<lb/>may be seen in the Report, acted: <add>the Evidence of</add> <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic>Baker abovementioned<lb/>being the other.  These Gentlemen both of them<lb/>Magistrates, <add>and <del>chief</del> in that quality <del>b</del></add> Managers, each of them, of a Prison, the two<lb/>only other persons <add>examined</add> being Head Jailers: viz <sic>Mr Newman<lb/>of Newgate, <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Ives of the Horsemanager Lane Prison,<lb/>each of these <add>two</add> examined as to discipline only, and not<lb/>as to <hi rend="underline">economy</hi>.</p> <p><add>Of the two <hi rend="underline">Magistrates</hi>, one, viz. <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Baker<lb/>was <del>lately</del> <add>I understand</add> upon <del>the</del> as soon after the passing of the Act, appointed <!-- continues in margin --> <del>one of</del> under <del>the</del><lb/>and by virtue of the<lb/>Act, appointed one<lb/>of the three Superintendents<lb/>for the erection<lb?>of the <del>Bus</del> now<lb/>intended Penitentiary<lb/>house, to be built on<lb/>the ground taken<lb/>out of my hands<lb/>as above.</add></p> <p>4. <hi rend="underline">For the Claimant</hi>.  In this direction will be found<lb/>to operate, in the case here in question, the same observations,<lb/> <add><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">os</hi></sic> 2. 3 and <del><gap/></del> 4,</add> which, in relation to the three preceding ones, have already<lb/>been brought to view.</p>
<p>10 May 1813 + 20<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> Compensation Claim <note>III. Contract<lb/>&sect;.7. Other Rates</note><lb/>(3) 3 <note>Observations</note></p> <p>In relation to the three last <add>viz. the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>, 5<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> &amp; 6<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></add> of these same Rates<lb/><del>the fo</del> observations to <del>th</del> <add>some such effect in the</add> following <del>effect</del> may perhaps<lb/>present themselves</p> <p><add>IV. As to the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Rate viz. Sir George Paul's and <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Baker's Rate</add></p> <p>V. <hi rend="underline">Against the Claimant</hi>.<lb/>1.  In regard to the Opinion of <hi rend="underline">Sir George Paul</hi> <del>that</del> it<lb/>is a naked Opinion, unsupported by an Accounts:<lb/><add>although the <del>Pris</del> only Prison, of and from the accounts of which that gentleman could have been speaking<lb/>was then, as for many years it had been, under his management.</add></p> <p><hi rend="underline">Answer.</hi>  It is <del>one</del> of the two only documents,<lb/>on the ground of which, so far as concerns economy, the<lb/>Penitentiary Committee, by which <add>in the setting aside the Claimants plan for such causes and</add> on <del>the</del> <add>such</add> Grounds <del>that</del> as<lb/>may be seen in the Report, acted: <add>the Evidence of</add> <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic>Baker abovementioned<lb/>being the other.  These Gentlemen both of them<lb/>Magistrates, <add>and <del>chief</del> in that quality <del>b</del></add> Managers, each of them, of a Prison, the two<lb/>only other persons <add>examined</add> being Head Jailers: viz <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Newman <!-- pencil note in margin --> <note><del><unclear>Beecher</unclear> a Supervisor</del></note><lb/>of Newgate, <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Ives of the Horsemanger Lane Prison,<lb/>each of these <add>two</add> examined as to <hi rend="underline">discipline</hi> only, and not<lb/>as to <hi rend="underline">economy</hi>.</p> <p><add>Of the two <hi rend="underline">Magistrates</hi>, one, viz. <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> Baker<lb/>was <del>lately</del> I understand upon <del>the</del> as soon after the passing of the Act, appointed <!-- continues in margin --> <del>one of</del> under <del>the</del><lb/>and by virtue of the<lb/>Act, appointed one<lb/>of the three Superintendents<lb/>for the erection<lb/>of the <del>Bus</del> now<lb/>intended Penitentiary<lb/>House, to be built on<lb/>the ground taken<lb/>out of my hands<lb/>as above.</add></p> <p>4. <hi rend="underline">For the Claimant</hi>.  In this direction will be found<lb/>to operate, in the case here in question, the same observations,<lb/> <add><sic>N<hi rend="superscript">os</hi></sic> 1, 2. 3 and <del><gap/></del> 4,</add> which, in relation to the three preceding cases, have already<lb/>been brought to view.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 12:13, 4 March 2021

'Click Here To Edit


10 May 1813 + 20
Panopt. Compensation Claim III. Contract
§.7. Other Rates

(3) 3 Observations

In relation to the three last viz. the 4th, 5th & 6th of these same Rates
the fo observations to th some such effect in the following effect may perhaps
present themselves

IV. As to the 4th Rate viz. Sir George Paul's and Mr Baker's Rate

V. Against the Claimant.
1. In regard to the Opinion of Sir George Paul that it
is a naked Opinion, unsupported by an Accounts:
although the Pris only Prison, of and from the accounts of which that gentleman could have been speaking
was then, as for many years it had been, under his management.

Answer. It is one of the two only documents,
on the ground of which, so far as concerns economy, the
Penitentiary Committee, by which in the setting aside the Claimants plan for such causes and on the such Grounds that as
may be seen in the Report, acted: the Evidence of MrBaker abovementioned
being the other. These Gentlemen both of them
Magistrates, and chief in that quality b Managers, each of them, of a Prison, the two
only other persons examined being Head Jailers: viz Mr Newman Beecher a Supervisor
of Newgate, Mr Ives of the Horsemanger Lane Prison,
each of these two examined as to discipline only, and not
as to economy.

Of the two Magistrates, one, viz. Mr Baker
was lately I understand upon the as soon after the passing of the Act, appointed one of under the
and by virtue of the
Act, appointed one
of the three Superintendents
for the erection
of the Bus now
intended Penitentiary
House, to be built on
the ground taken
out of my hands
as above.

4. For the Claimant. In this direction will be found
to operate, in the case here in question, the same observations,
Nos 1, 2. 3 and 4, which, in relation to the three preceding cases, have already
been brought to view.



Identifier: | JB/122/415/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1813-05-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

415

Info in main headings field

Panopt. Compensation Claim

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C3 / D20 / E3

Penner

Watermarks

<…> Co

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in