JB/122/432/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/432/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- header in pencil -->
 
<p>1 May 1813 +<lb/><sic>Panopt.</sic> <note>III> Contract<lb/>&sect;&sect; J.B. not to name</note><lb/>(5)<lb/>Omitted</p> <!-- whole page crossed through in pencil --> <p>Notwithstanding all this, the business, <del><gap/></del> <add>by causes</add> of a<lb/>nature much too high for me,<add>(except as  above) to speak to,</add> <del>to <gap/></del> and for means of<lb/>which not any the slightest intimation had ever been given<lb/>to me, having still been <del>suspended, at last</del> <add>kept in suspense, at length</add> in the same<lb/>month of the next year 1794, came the Act 34 G.c.84.,<lb/>which had been deemed necessary to give authority for the<lb/>Contract: here <add>then</add> was another year of deliberation.  <del>How came</del><lb/><del>About</del> <add><del>At last</del> Again, about</add> August 1798, the Draughts, <add>as</add> <del><gap/></del> printed <add>and repeated</add> in the Pulpits,<lb/><del>was proposed by</del> had been <del>put</del> <add>brought</add> into a state of <add><sic>compleat</sic></add> preparation by<lb/>all the law authorities, waiting for nothing but signature:-<lb/>Here was another year of consideration.  The business still<lb/><del>lingering</del> <add>lingering &#x2014; kept back by causes constantly covered with a veil of the profoundest secrecy &#x2014;</add> in <del>the year</del> <add>June</add> 1798, the Finance Committee took<lb/>up the subject and after the inquiry made into it as<lb/>stated in their 28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> August, given <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> and <del>taking</del> <add>receiving</add> the<lb/>answer given <add>in favour</add> <del>7<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></del><lb/><del>Treasury</del> <add>of it by the Treasury Board</add> with <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic><lb/>Pitt at the head of<lb/>it,<del><gap/></del></note> in favour of it that<lb/>recommendation which may be seen in that <add>same</add> Report.  Here<lb/><del>were</del> <add>there were</add> almost three years more of consideration, with more<lb/>confirmation from Parliament.</p> <p><del>In March</del> Almost two years after, viz. in March<lb/>1800, so far from viewing the plan with less favourable eyes,<lb/>the Duke of Portland, then Secretary of State, in <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>answer</add><lb/>to an application of mine to know <del>how many</del> what<lb/>should be the number of prisoners <add>which</add> the building should<lb/>be calculated to contain, mentioned <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> a letter which I had</note> <add>as and for</add> <del>2000 as</del> that<lb/>inmates, 2000: <del>being</del> double the number originally contracted<lb/>for.  Between June 1798 <del><gap/><del> and this last instance of<lb/>confirmation the interval of a little less than 2 years was<lb/>employed in the purchase of <add>the</add> land at Milbank which by the<lb/>late Act has been taken out of my hands, and in <del>the looking</del> <add>negotiating</add><lb/>with the privity of the Treasury for the quantity of land, what<lb/><del><gap/></del> was still wanting to make up the quantity originally<lb/>stipulated for and agreed to.</p>       




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:09, 15 March 2021

'Click Here To Edit

1 May 1813 +
Panopt. III> Contract
§§ J.B. not to name

(5)
Omitted

Notwithstanding all this, the business, by causes of a
nature much too high for me,(except as above) to speak to, to and for means of
which not any the slightest intimation had ever been given
to me, having still been suspended, at last kept in suspense, at length in the same
month of the next year 1794, came the Act 34 G.c.84.,
which had been deemed necessary to give authority for the
Contract: here then was another year of deliberation. How came
About At last Again, about August 1798, the Draughts, as printed and repeated in the Pulpits,
was proposed by had been put brought into a state of compleat preparation by
all the law authorities, waiting for nothing but signature:-
Here was another year of consideration. The business still
lingering lingering — kept back by causes constantly covered with a veil of the profoundest secrecy — in the year June 1798, the Finance Committee took
up the subject and after the inquiry made into it as
stated in their 28th August, given [+] [+] and taking receiving the
answer given in favour 7th
Treasury of it by the Treasury Board with Mr
Pitt at the head of
it,
in favour of it that
recommendation which may be seen in that same Report. Here
were there were almost three years more of consideration, with more
confirmation from Parliament.

In March Almost two years after, viz. in March
1800, so far from viewing the plan with less favourable eyes,
the Duke of Portland, then Secretary of State, in answer
to an application of mine to know how many what
should be the number of prisoners which the building should
be calculated to contain, mentioned [+] [+] a letter which I had as and for 2000 as that
inmates, 2000: being double the number originally contracted
for. Between June 1798 and this last instance of
confirmation the interval of a little less than 2 years was
employed in the purchase of the land at Milbank which by the
late Act has been taken out of my hands, and in the looking
negotiating
with the privity of the Treasury for the quantity of land, what
was still wanting to make up the quantity originally
stipulated for and agreed to.



Identifier: | JB/122/432/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1813-05-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

432

Info in main headings field

Panopt.

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C5

Penner

Watermarks

<…> Co

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::Omitted [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in